Model comparison
DeepSeek-V3.1-Terminus vs Hunyuan Vision 1.5
DeepSeek-V3.1-Terminus and Hunyuan Vision 1.5 score almost the same on the Noometry Index (43.1 vs 43.1), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.
Last verified . 8 shared benchmarks.
DeepSeek
TencentSummary
- They share 8 benchmarks with published results for both. DeepSeek-V3.1-Terminus scores higher in 5 categories and Hunyuan Vision 1.5 in 1 category; 2 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- DeepSeek-V3.1-Terminus has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| DeepSeek-V3.1-Terminus | Hunyuan Vision 1.5 | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | DeepSeek | Tencent |
| Noometry Index | 43.1 | 43.1 |
| Released | 2025-09-22 | — |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |
| Context window | 164K | — |
| Max output | 147K | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | $0.27 | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | $1 | — |
| Results tracked | 16 | 9 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Too close to call
DeepSeek-V3.1-Terminus: 42.0 (#113), Hunyuan Vision 1.5: 41.8 (#119)
| Benchmark | DeepSeek-V3.1-Terminus | Hunyuan Vision 1.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1426 | 1418 |
| SciCode | 40.6% | — |
| ALE-Bench | 745.17 | — |
Reasoning Hunyuan Vision 1.5 leads
DeepSeek-V3.1-Terminus: 26.4 (#133), Hunyuan Vision 1.5: 28.9 (#97)
| Benchmark | DeepSeek-V3.1-Terminus | Hunyuan Vision 1.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1426 | 1416 |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 57.4% | — |
| CritPt | 1.7% | — |
| DTBench | 81.3% | — |
| LMCA | 28.6% | — |
Math Not comparable
DeepSeek-V3.1-Terminus: 38.5 (#137), Hunyuan Vision 1.5: —
| Benchmark | DeepSeek-V3.1-Terminus | Hunyuan Vision 1.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1402 | — |
Multimodal Not comparable
DeepSeek-V3.1-Terminus: —, Hunyuan Vision 1.5: 35.7 (#84)
| Benchmark | DeepSeek-V3.1-Terminus | Hunyuan Vision 1.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | — | 1180 |
Multilingual DeepSeek-V3.1-Terminus leads
DeepSeek-V3.1-Terminus: 52.1 (#92), Hunyuan Vision 1.5: 50.3 (#125)
| Benchmark | DeepSeek-V3.1-Terminus | Hunyuan Vision 1.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1407 | 1382 |
| LMArena Russian | 1436 | — |
Instruction Following Too close to call
DeepSeek-V3.1-Terminus: 74.0 (#106), Hunyuan Vision 1.5: 73.7 (#117)
| Benchmark | DeepSeek-V3.1-Terminus | Hunyuan Vision 1.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1404 | 1397 |
Long Context Too close to call
DeepSeek-V3.1-Terminus: 43.4 (#97), Hunyuan Vision 1.5: 42.9 (#115)
| Benchmark | DeepSeek-V3.1-Terminus | Hunyuan Vision 1.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1421 | 1404 |
Writing & Preference Too close to call
DeepSeek-V3.1-Terminus: 61.0 (#92), Hunyuan Vision 1.5: 60.1 (#100)
| Benchmark | DeepSeek-V3.1-Terminus | Hunyuan Vision 1.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1419 | 1405 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1403 | 1388 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1411 | 1422 |
Frequently asked questions
Is DeepSeek-V3.1-Terminus better than Hunyuan Vision 1.5?
DeepSeek-V3.1-Terminus and Hunyuan Vision 1.5 score almost the same on the Noometry Index (43.1 vs 43.1), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.
Is DeepSeek-V3.1-Terminus or Hunyuan Vision 1.5 better for coding?
They score almost the same on coding (42.0 vs 41.8); test both on your own repository before choosing.
How many benchmarks do DeepSeek-V3.1-Terminus and Hunyuan Vision 1.5 share?
8 benchmarks have published results for both models. DeepSeek-V3.1-Terminus has 16 scored results on Noometry and Hunyuan Vision 1.5 has 9.