Model comparison

DeepSeek-V3.1-Terminus vs Longcat Flash Chat

DeepSeek-V3.1-Terminus is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.1 to 42.1 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 11 shared benchmarks.

DeepSeek-V3.1-Terminus DeepSeek

43.1

Rank #97 Confirmed

Longcat Flash Chat Meituan

42.1

Rank #120 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 11 benchmarks with published results for both. DeepSeek-V3.1-Terminus scores higher in 2 categories and Longcat Flash Chat in 5 categories; 2 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in reasoning, where DeepSeek-V3.1-Terminus leads 26.4 to 19.0.
  • The biggest single-benchmark swing is Kagi LLM Benchmark: 57.4% for DeepSeek-V3.1-Terminus and 43.9% for Longcat Flash Chat.

Side by side

DeepSeek-V3.1-Terminus and Longcat Flash Chat specifications
DeepSeek-V3.1-TerminusLongcat Flash Chat
ProviderDeepSeekMeituan
Noometry Index43.142.1
Released2025-09-22—
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window164K—
Max output147K—
Input $ / M tokens$0.27—
Output $ / M tokens$1—
Results tracked1619

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Longcat Flash Chat leads

DeepSeek-V3.1-Terminus: 42.0 (#113), Longcat Flash Chat: 43.5 (#87)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek-V3.1-TerminusLongcat Flash Chat
LMArena Coding14261471
SciCode40.6%—
ALE-Bench745.17—

Reasoning DeepSeek-V3.1-Terminus leads

DeepSeek-V3.1-Terminus: 26.4 (#133), Longcat Flash Chat: 19.0 (#272)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek-V3.1-TerminusLongcat Flash Chat
Kagi LLM Benchmark57.4%43.9%
LMArena Hard Prompts14261440
NYT Connections (extended)—17.7%
CritPt1.7%—
DTBench81.3%—
LMCA28.6%—

Math Too close to call

DeepSeek-V3.1-Terminus: 38.5 (#137), Longcat Flash Chat: 39.4 (#107)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek-V3.1-TerminusLongcat Flash Chat
LMArena Math14021442

Knowledge Not comparable

DeepSeek-V3.1-Terminus: —, Longcat Flash Chat: 40.6 (#116)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek-V3.1-TerminusLongcat Flash Chat
LMArena Expert—1454

Multilingual Too close to call

DeepSeek-V3.1-Terminus: 52.1 (#92), Longcat Flash Chat: 51.9 (#101)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek-V3.1-TerminusLongcat Flash Chat
LMArena Non-English14071404
LMArena Russian14361395
LMArena Chinese—1465
LMArena French—1456
LMArena German—1408
LMArena Japanese—1373
LMArena Korean—1371
LMArena Spanish—1445

Instruction Following Too close to call

DeepSeek-V3.1-Terminus: 74.0 (#106), Longcat Flash Chat: 74.4 (#96)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek-V3.1-TerminusLongcat Flash Chat
LMArena Instruction Following14041411

Long Context Too close to call

DeepSeek-V3.1-Terminus: 43.4 (#97), Longcat Flash Chat: 43.5 (#93)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek-V3.1-TerminusLongcat Flash Chat
LMArena Longer Query14211425

Writing & Preference Too close to call

DeepSeek-V3.1-Terminus: 61.0 (#92), Longcat Flash Chat: 61.0 (#91)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek-V3.1-TerminusLongcat Flash Chat
LMArena Text14191427
LMArena Creative Writing14031388
LMArena Multi-Turn14111418

Frequently asked questions

Is DeepSeek-V3.1-Terminus better than Longcat Flash Chat?

DeepSeek-V3.1-Terminus is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.1 to 42.1 on the Noometry Index.

Is DeepSeek-V3.1-Terminus or Longcat Flash Chat better for coding?

Longcat Flash Chat scores higher on coding benchmarks: 43.5 versus 42.0 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do DeepSeek-V3.1-Terminus and Longcat Flash Chat share?

11 benchmarks have published results for both models. DeepSeek-V3.1-Terminus has 16 scored results on Noometry and Longcat Flash Chat has 19.

Related comparisons

Go deeper