Model comparison

DeepSeek-V3.1-Terminus vs MiMo-V2.6-Flash

MiMo-V2.6-Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 44.4 to 42.6 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 10 shared benchmarks.

DeepSeek-V3.1-Terminus DeepSeek

42.6

Rank #96 Confirmed

MiMo-V2.6-Flash Xiaomi

44.4

Rank #74 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 10 benchmarks with published results for both. DeepSeek-V3.1-Terminus scores higher in 0 categories and MiMo-V2.6-Flash in 7 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in reasoning, where MiMo-V2.6-Flash leads 29.6 to 25.7.
  • MiMo-V2.6-Flash is cheaper at $0.14 / $0.28 per million input/output tokens, against $0.30 / $1 for DeepSeek-V3.1-Terminus.
  • MiMo-V2.6-Flash accepts more context: 1.05M tokens versus 164K.

Side by side

DeepSeek-V3.1-Terminus and MiMo-V2.6-Flash specifications
DeepSeek-V3.1-TerminusMiMo-V2.6-Flash
ProviderDeepSeekXiaomi
Noometry Index42.644.4
Released2025-09-222026-09-22
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window164K1.05M
Max output66K131K
Input $ / M tokens$0.30$0.14
Output $ / M tokens$1$0.28
Results tracked1613

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding MiMo-V2.6-Flash leads

DeepSeek-V3.1-Terminus: 41.5 (#114), MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 44.3 (#68)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek-V3.1-TerminusMiMo-V2.6-Flash
LMArena Coding14261516
SciCode40.6%—
ALE-Bench745.17—

Reasoning MiMo-V2.6-Flash leads

DeepSeek-V3.1-Terminus: 25.7 (#126), MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 29.6 (#82)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek-V3.1-TerminusMiMo-V2.6-Flash
LMArena Hard Prompts14271481
Kagi LLM Benchmark57.4%—
CritPt1.7%—
DTBench81.3%—
LMCA28.6%—

Math MiMo-V2.6-Flash leads

DeepSeek-V3.1-Terminus: 35.7 (#138), MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 37.4 (#97)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek-V3.1-TerminusMiMo-V2.6-Flash
LMArena Math14021477

Knowledge Not comparable

DeepSeek-V3.1-Terminus: —, MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 42.0 (#91)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek-V3.1-TerminusMiMo-V2.6-Flash
LMArena Expert—1516

Multimodal Not comparable

DeepSeek-V3.1-Terminus: —, MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 40.2 (#39)

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek-V3.1-TerminusMiMo-V2.6-Flash
LMArena Vision—1266

Multilingual MiMo-V2.6-Flash leads

DeepSeek-V3.1-Terminus: 52.3 (#87), MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 54.6 (#41)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek-V3.1-TerminusMiMo-V2.6-Flash
LMArena Non-English14071439
LMArena Russian14341424
LMArena Chinese—1501

Instruction Following MiMo-V2.6-Flash leads

DeepSeek-V3.1-Terminus: 74.4 (#96), MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 77.0 (#33)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek-V3.1-TerminusMiMo-V2.6-Flash
LMArena Instruction Following14061463

Long Context MiMo-V2.6-Flash leads

DeepSeek-V3.1-Terminus: 43.5 (#88), MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 44.8 (#52)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek-V3.1-TerminusMiMo-V2.6-Flash
LMArena Longer Query14261465

Writing & Preference MiMo-V2.6-Flash leads

DeepSeek-V3.1-Terminus: 61.3 (#87), MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 63.9 (#61)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek-V3.1-TerminusMiMo-V2.6-Flash
LMArena Text14201459
LMArena Creative Writing14041408
LMArena Multi-Turn14111460

Frequently asked questions

Is DeepSeek-V3.1-Terminus better than MiMo-V2.6-Flash?

MiMo-V2.6-Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 44.4 to 42.6 on the Noometry Index.

Which is cheaper, DeepSeek-V3.1-Terminus or MiMo-V2.6-Flash?

MiMo-V2.6-Flash is cheaper. It lists at $0.14 per million input tokens and $0.28 per million output tokens; DeepSeek-V3.1-Terminus lists at $0.30 and $1.

Is DeepSeek-V3.1-Terminus or MiMo-V2.6-Flash better for coding?

MiMo-V2.6-Flash scores higher on coding benchmarks: 44.3 versus 41.5 in the Noometry coding category.

Which has the bigger context window?

MiMo-V2.6-Flash does, with 1.05M tokens against 164K.

How many benchmarks do DeepSeek-V3.1-Terminus and MiMo-V2.6-Flash share?

10 benchmarks have published results for both models. DeepSeek-V3.1-Terminus has 16 scored results on Noometry and MiMo-V2.6-Flash has 13.

Related comparisons

Go deeper