Model comparison

DeepSeek-V3.1 vs o3-pro

DeepSeek-V3.1 and o3-pro score almost the same on the Noometry Index (42.8 vs 42.9), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.

Last verified . 7 shared benchmarks.

DeepSeek-V3.1 DeepSeek

42.8

Rank #108 Confirmed

o3-pro OpenAI

42.9

Rank #105 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 7 benchmarks with published results for both. DeepSeek-V3.1 scores higher in 3 categories and o3-pro in 2 categories; 5 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in long context, where o3-pro leads 72.2 to 36.3.
  • The biggest single-benchmark swing is Fiction.LiveBench: 52.8% for DeepSeek-V3.1 and 97.2% for o3-pro.
  • DeepSeek-V3.1 is cheaper at $0.25 / $0.95 per million input/output tokens, against $20 / $80 for o3-pro.
  • o3-pro accepts more context: 200K tokens versus 164K.
  • DeepSeek-V3.1 has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

DeepSeek-V3.1 and o3-pro specifications
DeepSeek-V3.1o3-pro
ProviderDeepSeekOpenAI
Noometry Index42.842.9
Released2025-08-212025-06-10
WeightsOpenProprietary
Context window164K200K
Max output8K100K
Input $ / M tokens$0.25$20
Output $ / M tokens$0.95$80
Results tracked2712

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding o3-pro leads

DeepSeek-V3.1: 40.3 (#144), o3-pro: 55.5 (#24)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek-V3.1o3-pro
WeirdML38.4%58.2%
Aider Polyglot—84.9%
LMArena Coding1417—

Reasoning DeepSeek-V3.1 leads

DeepSeek-V3.1: 27.9 (#110), o3-pro: 23.8 (#171)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek-V3.1o3-pro
Kagi LLM Benchmark53.2%72.1%
DTBench82.7%86.9%
LMCA24.3%38.5%
Epoch Capabilities Index139.92147.42
ARC-AGI-2—4.9%
SimpleBench40%—
ARC-AGI-1—59.3%
LMArena Hard Prompts1417—
ForecastBench58—

Math Not comparable

DeepSeek-V3.1: 38.9 (#122), o3-pro: —

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek-V3.1o3-pro
LMArena Math1420—

Knowledge DeepSeek-V3.1 leads

DeepSeek-V3.1: 43.7 (#90), o3-pro: 29.5 (#238)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek-V3.1o3-pro
Vectara Hallucination Rate5.5%23.3%
Confabulations—14.2%
LMArena Expert1405—

Multilingual Not comparable

DeepSeek-V3.1: 51.6 (#106), o3-pro: —

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek-V3.1o3-pro
LMArena Non-English1400—
LMArena Chinese1469—
LMArena French1447—
LMArena German1411—
LMArena Japanese1378—
LMArena Korean1337—
LMArena Russian1405—
LMArena Spanish1431—

Instruction Following Not comparable

DeepSeek-V3.1: 73.9 (#110), o3-pro: —

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek-V3.1o3-pro
LMArena Instruction Following1400—

Long Context o3-pro leads

DeepSeek-V3.1: 36.3 (#232), o3-pro: 72.2 (#1)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek-V3.1o3-pro
Fiction.LiveBench52.8%97.2%
LMArena Longer Query1422—

Writing & Preference DeepSeek-V3.1 leads

DeepSeek-V3.1: 60.3 (#98), o3-pro: 57.1 (#133)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek-V3.1o3-pro
LMArena Text1420—
LMArena Creative Writing1401—
Short-Story Creative Writing—84.4%
EQ-Bench Creative Writing1436—
LMArena Multi-Turn1408—

Frequently asked questions

Is DeepSeek-V3.1 better than o3-pro?

DeepSeek-V3.1 and o3-pro score almost the same on the Noometry Index (42.8 vs 42.9), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.

Which is cheaper, DeepSeek-V3.1 or o3-pro?

DeepSeek-V3.1 is cheaper. It lists at $0.25 per million input tokens and $0.95 per million output tokens; o3-pro lists at $20 and $80.

Is DeepSeek-V3.1 or o3-pro better for coding?

o3-pro scores higher on coding benchmarks: 55.5 versus 40.3 in the Noometry coding category.

Which has the bigger context window?

o3-pro does, with 200K tokens against 164K.

How many benchmarks do DeepSeek-V3.1 and o3-pro share?

7 benchmarks have published results for both models. DeepSeek-V3.1 has 27 scored results on Noometry and o3-pro has 12.

Related comparisons

Go deeper