Model comparison

DeepSeek-V3.2-Exp vs GPT-6 Astra

GPT-6 Astra is the stronger model overall, scoring 70.8 to 44.3 on the Noometry Index. DeepSeek-V3.2-Exp costs 69× less per token, which makes it the better buy when GPT-6 Astra's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

Last verified . 35 shared benchmarks.

DeepSeek-V3.2-Exp DeepSeek

44.3

Rank #78 Confirmed

GPT-6 Astra OpenAI

70.8

Rank #1 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 35 benchmarks with published results for both. DeepSeek-V3.2-Exp scores higher in 1 category and GPT-6 Astra in 8 categories; 9 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in reasoning, where GPT-6 Astra leads 85.1 to 22.1.
  • The biggest single-benchmark swing is ProofBench: 8% for DeepSeek-V3.2-Exp and 99% for GPT-6 Astra.
  • DeepSeek-V3.2-Exp is cheaper at $0.26 / $0.38 per million input/output tokens, against $10 / $50 for GPT-6 Astra.
  • GPT-6 Astra accepts more context: 1.05M tokens versus 164K.
  • DeepSeek-V3.2-Exp has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

DeepSeek-V3.2-Exp and GPT-6 Astra specifications
DeepSeek-V3.2-ExpGPT-6 Astra
ProviderDeepSeekOpenAI
Noometry Index44.370.8
Released2025-09-292026-09-03
WeightsOpenProprietary
Context window164K1.05M
Max output66K128K
Input $ / M tokens$0.26$10
Output $ / M tokens$0.38$50
Results tracked4956

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding GPT-6 Astra leads

DeepSeek-V3.2-Exp: 46.5 (#65), GPT-6 Astra: 73.7 (#2)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek-V3.2-ExpGPT-6 Astra
LMArena WebDev13621786
SciCode38.9%56.5%
WeirdML39.5%93.6%
LMArena Coding14541487
DeepSWE—74.1%
FrontierCode—53.3%
SWE-bench Verified (bash only)70%—
Aider Polyglot74.2%—
SWE-bench Multilingual59%—
FrontierSWE—65.5%
GSO—79.4%
MirrorCode—46.7%
ALE-Bench—2,951

Agentic & Tool Use GPT-6 Astra leads

DeepSeek-V3.2-Exp: 32.7 (#59), GPT-6 Astra: 52.9 (#3)

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek-V3.2-ExpGPT-6 Astra
APEX-Agents21.3%64.7%
Vending-Bench 21,03415,515
Terminal-Bench39.6%—
Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard56.7%—
Remote Labor Index—20.8%
TheAgentCompany42.9%—
BALROG—68.3%
GDP.pdf—34.2%

Reasoning GPT-6 Astra leads

DeepSeek-V3.2-Exp: 22.1 (#208), GPT-6 Astra: 85.1 (#1)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek-V3.2-ExpGPT-6 Astra
ARC-AGI-24%95%
NYT Connections (extended)36.7%98.1%
ARC-AGI-157%98.5%
CritPt2.9%31.7%
Chess Puzzles14%72%
LMArena Hard Prompts14341462
DTBench87.7%97.3%
LMCA29.1%64.4%
Epoch Capabilities Index146.27166.45
Kagi LLM Benchmark52.2%—
Thematic Generalization65%—
EBR-Bench—76.2%
Mystery Game Puzzles—84%
Bench to the Future 3—0.14

Math GPT-6 Astra leads

DeepSeek-V3.2-Exp: 41.7 (#87), GPT-6 Astra: 93.5 (#2)

Knowledge GPT-6 Astra leads

DeepSeek-V3.2-Exp: 51.7 (#66), GPT-6 Astra: 75.3 (#1)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek-V3.2-ExpGPT-6 Astra
GPQA Diamond83.4%95.8%
Vectara Hallucination Rate5.3%8.7%
LMArena Expert14361483
Humanity's Last Exam—54.8%
SimpleQA Verified—75.6%

Multimodal Not comparable

DeepSeek-V3.2-Exp: —, GPT-6 Astra: 55.0 (#3)

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek-V3.2-ExpGPT-6 Astra
LMArena Vision—1281
Blueprint-Bench 2—49.7%
Furniture Assembly—80%
LMArena Document—1468

Multilingual GPT-6 Astra leads

DeepSeek-V3.2-Exp: 52.2 (#90), GPT-6 Astra: 53.7 (#61)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek-V3.2-ExpGPT-6 Astra
LMArena Non-English14091430
LMArena Chinese14611484
LMArena French14331456
LMArena German14401440
LMArena Japanese13741379
LMArena Korean13711426
LMArena Russian14241436
LMArena Spanish14401407

Instruction Following GPT-6 Astra leads

DeepSeek-V3.2-Exp: 74.5 (#93), GPT-6 Astra: 76.3 (#44)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek-V3.2-ExpGPT-6 Astra
LMArena Instruction Following14131450

Long Context DeepSeek-V3.2-Exp leads

DeepSeek-V3.2-Exp: 47.6 (#16), GPT-6 Astra: 44.5 (#62)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek-V3.2-ExpGPT-6 Astra
LMArena Longer Query14281456
Fiction.LiveBench83.3%—
CL-bench13.2%—
CL-bench Life9.5%—

Writing & Preference GPT-6 Astra leads

DeepSeek-V3.2-Exp: 62.4 (#77), GPT-6 Astra: 75.3 (#7)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek-V3.2-ExpGPT-6 Astra
LMArena Text14251441
LMArena Creative Writing14031418
EQ-Bench Creative Writing15152173
LMArena Multi-Turn14271448

Frequently asked questions

Is DeepSeek-V3.2-Exp better than GPT-6 Astra?

GPT-6 Astra is the stronger model overall, scoring 70.8 to 44.3 on the Noometry Index. DeepSeek-V3.2-Exp costs 69× less per token, which makes it the better buy when GPT-6 Astra's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

Which is cheaper, DeepSeek-V3.2-Exp or GPT-6 Astra?

DeepSeek-V3.2-Exp is cheaper. It lists at $0.26 per million input tokens and $0.38 per million output tokens; GPT-6 Astra lists at $10 and $50.

Is DeepSeek-V3.2-Exp or GPT-6 Astra better for coding?

GPT-6 Astra scores higher on coding benchmarks: 73.7 versus 46.5 in the Noometry coding category.

Which has the bigger context window?

GPT-6 Astra does, with 1.05M tokens against 164K.

How many benchmarks do DeepSeek-V3.2-Exp and GPT-6 Astra share?

35 benchmarks have published results for both models. DeepSeek-V3.2-Exp has 49 scored results on Noometry and GPT-6 Astra has 56.

Related comparisons

Go deeper