Model comparison
DeepSeek-V3.2-Exp vs Qwen3.5 Max Preview
Qwen3.5 Max Preview is the stronger model overall, scoring 45.3 to 44.3 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 17 shared benchmarks.
DeepSeek
Alibaba (Qwen)Summary
- They share 17 benchmarks with published results for both. DeepSeek-V3.2-Exp scores higher in 4 categories and Qwen3.5 Max Preview in 4 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in knowledge, where DeepSeek-V3.2-Exp leads 51.7 to 41.8.
- DeepSeek-V3.2-Exp has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| DeepSeek-V3.2-Exp | Qwen3.5 Max Preview | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | DeepSeek | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 44.3 | 45.3 |
| Released | 2025-09-29 | — |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |
| Context window | 164K | — |
| Max output | 66K | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | $0.26 | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | $0.38 | — |
| Results tracked | 49 | 17 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding DeepSeek-V3.2-Exp leads
DeepSeek-V3.2-Exp: 46.5 (#65), Qwen3.5 Max Preview: 44.0 (#77)
| Benchmark | DeepSeek-V3.2-Exp | Qwen3.5 Max Preview |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1454 | 1487 |
| SWE-bench Verified (bash only) | 70% | — |
| Aider Polyglot | 74.2% | — |
| LMArena WebDev | 1362 | — |
| SWE-bench Multilingual | 59% | — |
| SciCode | 38.9% | — |
| WeirdML | 39.5% | — |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
DeepSeek-V3.2-Exp: 32.7 (#59), Qwen3.5 Max Preview: —
| Benchmark | DeepSeek-V3.2-Exp | Qwen3.5 Max Preview |
|---|---|---|
| Terminal-Bench | 39.6% | — |
| APEX-Agents | 21.3% | — |
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | 56.7% | — |
| TheAgentCompany | 42.9% | — |
| Vending-Bench 2 | 1,034 | — |
Reasoning Qwen3.5 Max Preview leads
DeepSeek-V3.2-Exp: 22.1 (#208), Qwen3.5 Max Preview: 30.8 (#84)
| Benchmark | DeepSeek-V3.2-Exp | Qwen3.5 Max Preview |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1434 | 1483 |
| ARC-AGI-2 | 4% | — |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 52.2% | — |
| NYT Connections (extended) | 36.7% | — |
| ARC-AGI-1 | 57% | — |
| CritPt | 2.9% | — |
| Chess Puzzles | 14% | — |
| Thematic Generalization | 65% | — |
| DTBench | 87.7% | — |
| LMCA | 29.1% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 146.27 | — |
Math DeepSeek-V3.2-Exp leads
DeepSeek-V3.2-Exp: 41.7 (#87), Qwen3.5 Max Preview: 40.1 (#94)
| Benchmark | DeepSeek-V3.2-Exp | Qwen3.5 Max Preview |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1435 | 1474 |
| MathArena Final-Answer Competitions | 57.7% | — |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 87.8% | — |
| ProofBench | 8% | — |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | 22.1% | — |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1) | 2.1% | — |
Knowledge DeepSeek-V3.2-Exp leads
DeepSeek-V3.2-Exp: 51.7 (#66), Qwen3.5 Max Preview: 41.8 (#107)
| Benchmark | DeepSeek-V3.2-Exp | Qwen3.5 Max Preview |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1436 | 1489 |
| GPQA Diamond | 83.4% | — |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | 5.3% | — |
Multilingual Qwen3.5 Max Preview leads
DeepSeek-V3.2-Exp: 52.2 (#90), Qwen3.5 Max Preview: 56.2 (#22)
| Benchmark | DeepSeek-V3.2-Exp | Qwen3.5 Max Preview |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1409 | 1465 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1461 | 1534 |
| LMArena French | 1433 | 1484 |
| LMArena German | 1440 | 1487 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1374 | 1495 |
| LMArena Korean | 1371 | 1438 |
| LMArena Russian | 1424 | 1471 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1440 | 1470 |
Instruction Following Qwen3.5 Max Preview leads
DeepSeek-V3.2-Exp: 74.5 (#93), Qwen3.5 Max Preview: 77.0 (#31)
| Benchmark | DeepSeek-V3.2-Exp | Qwen3.5 Max Preview |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1413 | 1467 |
Long Context DeepSeek-V3.2-Exp leads
DeepSeek-V3.2-Exp: 47.6 (#16), Qwen3.5 Max Preview: 45.2 (#45)
| Benchmark | DeepSeek-V3.2-Exp | Qwen3.5 Max Preview |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1428 | 1476 |
| Fiction.LiveBench | 83.3% | — |
| CL-bench | 13.2% | — |
| CL-bench Life | 9.5% | — |
Writing & Preference Qwen3.5 Max Preview leads
DeepSeek-V3.2-Exp: 62.4 (#77), Qwen3.5 Max Preview: 66.0 (#41)
| Benchmark | DeepSeek-V3.2-Exp | Qwen3.5 Max Preview |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1425 | 1470 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1403 | 1464 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1427 | 1478 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 1515 | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is DeepSeek-V3.2-Exp better than Qwen3.5 Max Preview?
Qwen3.5 Max Preview is the stronger model overall, scoring 45.3 to 44.3 on the Noometry Index.
Is DeepSeek-V3.2-Exp or Qwen3.5 Max Preview better for coding?
DeepSeek-V3.2-Exp scores higher on coding benchmarks: 46.5 versus 44.0 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do DeepSeek-V3.2-Exp and Qwen3.5 Max Preview share?
17 benchmarks have published results for both models. DeepSeek-V3.2-Exp has 49 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3.5 Max Preview has 17.