Model comparison
DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale vs Hunyuan Turbo 0110
DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale and Hunyuan Turbo 0110 score almost the same on the Noometry Index (39.7 vs 39.6), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
DeepSeek
TencentSummary
- The widest gap is in reasoning, where DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale leads 32.9 to 26.1.
- DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale | Hunyuan Turbo 0110 | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | DeepSeek | Tencent |
| Noometry Index | 39.7 | 39.6 |
| Released | 2025-12-01 | — |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |
| Context window | 128K | — |
| Max output | 128K | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | $0.58 | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | $1.68 | — |
| Results tracked | 3 | 11 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale leads
DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale: 40.4 (#140), Hunyuan Turbo 0110: 38.6 (#171)
| Benchmark | DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale | Hunyuan Turbo 0110 |
|---|---|---|
| WeirdML | 46.7% | — |
| LMArena Coding | — | 1319 |
Reasoning DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale leads
DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale: 32.9 (#73), Hunyuan Turbo 0110: 26.1 (#137)
| Benchmark | DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale | Hunyuan Turbo 0110 |
|---|---|---|
| SimpleBench | 52.6% | — |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | — | 1308 |
Math Not comparable
DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale: —, Hunyuan Turbo 0110: 35.6 (#180)
| Benchmark | DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale | Hunyuan Turbo 0110 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | — | 1273 |
Multilingual Not comparable
DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale: —, Hunyuan Turbo 0110: 43.3 (#184)
| Benchmark | DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale | Hunyuan Turbo 0110 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | — | 1285 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1358 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1305 |
Instruction Following Not comparable
DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale: —, Hunyuan Turbo 0110: 67.4 (#195)
| Benchmark | DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale | Hunyuan Turbo 0110 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | — | 1278 |
Long Context Not comparable
DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale: —, Hunyuan Turbo 0110: 39.8 (#168)
| Benchmark | DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale | Hunyuan Turbo 0110 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1309 |
Writing & Preference Hunyuan Turbo 0110 leads
DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale: 46.0 (#222), Hunyuan Turbo 0110: 50.2 (#183)
| Benchmark | DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale | Hunyuan Turbo 0110 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | — | 1311 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1269 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 1276 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1303 |
Frequently asked questions
Is DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale better than Hunyuan Turbo 0110?
DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale and Hunyuan Turbo 0110 score almost the same on the Noometry Index (39.7 vs 39.6), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.
Is DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale or Hunyuan Turbo 0110 better for coding?
DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale scores higher on coding benchmarks: 40.4 versus 38.6 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale and Hunyuan Turbo 0110 share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale has 3 scored results on Noometry and Hunyuan Turbo 0110 has 11.