Model comparison

DeepSeek-V3 vs GPT-5.4 mini

GPT-5.4 mini is the stronger model overall, scoring 44.8 to 39.2 on the Noometry Index. DeepSeek-V3 costs 4.2× less per token, which makes it the better buy when GPT-5.4 mini's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

Last verified . 30 shared benchmarks.

DeepSeek-V3 DeepSeek

39.2

Rank #157 Confirmed

GPT-5.4 mini OpenAI

44.8

Rank #69 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 30 benchmarks with published results for both. DeepSeek-V3 scores higher in 0 categories and GPT-5.4 mini in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in math, where GPT-5.4 mini leads 45.4 to 30.4.
  • The biggest single-benchmark swing is OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025: 37.8% for DeepSeek-V3 and 88.9% for GPT-5.4 mini.
  • DeepSeek-V3 is cheaper at $0.24 / $0.90 per million input/output tokens, against $0.75 / $4.50 for GPT-5.4 mini.
  • GPT-5.4 mini accepts more context: 400K tokens versus 164K.
  • DeepSeek-V3 has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

DeepSeek-V3 and GPT-5.4 mini specifications
DeepSeek-V3GPT-5.4 mini
ProviderDeepSeekOpenAI
Noometry Index39.244.8
Released2024-12-262026-03-17
WeightsOpenProprietary
Context window164K400K
Max output164K128K
Input $ / M tokens$0.24$0.75
Output $ / M tokens$0.90$4.50
Results tracked6046

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding GPT-5.4 mini leads

DeepSeek-V3: 41.9 (#99), GPT-5.4 mini: 45.0 (#67)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek-V3GPT-5.4 mini
SciCode35.8%49.9%
WeirdML36.1%60.3%
LMArena Coding13681438
FrontierCode—27%
Aider Polyglot55.1%—
LMArena WebDev—1397
BigCodeBench Instruct50%—
LiveBench Coding70.9%—
BigCodeBench Complete62.2%—
ALE-Bench—1,189
HumanEval+86.6%—
MBPP+73%—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

DeepSeek-V3: —, GPT-5.4 mini: 29.6 (#74)

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek-V3GPT-5.4 mini
DeepResearch Bench—36.3%
METR Time Horizons49.6%—

Reasoning GPT-5.4 mini leads

DeepSeek-V3: 20.0 (#226), GPT-5.4 mini: 30.3 (#77)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek-V3GPT-5.4 mini
Kagi LLM Benchmark52.3%37.9%
CritPt0%10%
LMArena Hard Prompts13651424
DTBench64.8%80%
LMCA15.5%40.8%
Epoch Capabilities Index135.95148.83
ForecastBench59.157
ARC-AGI-2—18.9%
SimpleBench27.2%—
NYT Connections (extended)—61.8%
ARC-AGI-1—63.7%
Chess Puzzles—24%
Thematic Generalization—61.7%
LiveBench Reasoning65.8%—
Mystery Game Puzzles—11%
LiveBench Data Analysis60.9%—
BIG-Bench Hard87.5%—
HellaSwag88.9%—
LiveBench66.9%—
PIQA84.7%—
WinoGrande85.2%—

Math GPT-5.4 mini leads

DeepSeek-V3: 30.4 (#208), GPT-5.4 mini: 45.4 (#63)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek-V3GPT-5.4 mini
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-202537.8%88.9%
LMArena Math13731418
FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set)1.7%28.3%
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)—51.2%
FrontierMath Tier 4—9.8%
ProofBench—21%
Omni-MATH40.3%—
LiveBench Math73.5%—
MATH Level 575.5%—
FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1)—2.1%

Knowledge GPT-5.4 mini leads

DeepSeek-V3: 37.5 (#147), GPT-5.4 mini: 51.4 (#62)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek-V3GPT-5.4 mini
GPQA Diamond67.6%86.9%
Vectara Hallucination Rate6.1%5.5%
LMArena Expert13521434
SimpleQA Verified—29.4%
MMLU-Pro72.3%—
Confabulations26.1%—
GPQA (HELM)53.8%—
ARC (AI2) Challenge95.3%—
MMLU87.2%—
TriviaQA82.9%—

Multimodal Not comparable

DeepSeek-V3: —, GPT-5.4 mini: 39.0 (#51)

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek-V3GPT-5.4 mini
LMArena Vision—1245

Multilingual GPT-5.4 mini leads

DeepSeek-V3: 48.8 (#138), GPT-5.4 mini: 52.1 (#94)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek-V3GPT-5.4 mini
LMArena Non-English13581405
LMArena Chinese13901446
LMArena French13861440
LMArena German13741407
LMArena Japanese13331375
LMArena Korean13211369
LMArena Russian13721417
LMArena Spanish13581403

Instruction Following GPT-5.4 mini leads

DeepSeek-V3: 73.0 (#125), GPT-5.4 mini: 74.3 (#99)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek-V3GPT-5.4 mini
LMArena Instruction Following13451405
LiveBench Instruction Following81.5%—
IFEval83.2%—

Long Context GPT-5.4 mini leads

DeepSeek-V3: 34.0 (#248), GPT-5.4 mini: 42.9 (#107)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek-V3GPT-5.4 mini
LMArena Longer Query13531407
Fiction.LiveBench50%—

Writing & Preference GPT-5.4 mini leads

DeepSeek-V3: 57.6 (#124), GPT-5.4 mini: 64.2 (#56)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek-V3GPT-5.4 mini
LMArena Text13751411
LMArena Creative Writing13641370
EQ-Bench Creative Writing14721665
LMArena Multi-Turn13891429
Short-Story Creative Writing77%—
WildBench83%—
LiveBench Language49.1%—

Frequently asked questions

Is DeepSeek-V3 better than GPT-5.4 mini?

GPT-5.4 mini is the stronger model overall, scoring 44.8 to 39.2 on the Noometry Index. DeepSeek-V3 costs 4.2× less per token, which makes it the better buy when GPT-5.4 mini's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

Which is cheaper, DeepSeek-V3 or GPT-5.4 mini?

DeepSeek-V3 is cheaper. It lists at $0.24 per million input tokens and $0.90 per million output tokens; GPT-5.4 mini lists at $0.75 and $4.50.

Is DeepSeek-V3 or GPT-5.4 mini better for coding?

GPT-5.4 mini scores higher on coding benchmarks: 45.0 versus 41.9 in the Noometry coding category.

Which has the bigger context window?

GPT-5.4 mini does, with 400K tokens against 164K.

How many benchmarks do DeepSeek-V3 and GPT-5.4 mini share?

30 benchmarks have published results for both models. DeepSeek-V3 has 60 scored results on Noometry and GPT-5.4 mini has 46.

Related comparisons

Go deeper