Model comparison

DeepSeek-V3 vs Mistral

DeepSeek-V3 is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.5 to 29.9 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 22 shared benchmarks.

DeepSeek-V3 DeepSeek

39.5

Rank #166 Confirmed

Mistral Mistral AI

29.9

Rank #303 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 22 benchmarks with published results for both. DeepSeek-V3 scores higher in 6 categories and Mistral in 2 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in knowledge, where DeepSeek-V3 leads 37.5 to 16.6.
  • The biggest single-benchmark swing is MMLU-Pro: 72.3% for DeepSeek-V3 and 27.7% for Mistral.
  • DeepSeek-V3 has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

DeepSeek-V3 and Mistral specifications
DeepSeek-V3Mistral
ProviderDeepSeekMistral AI
Noometry Index39.529.9
Released2024-12-26—
WeightsOpenProprietary
Context window164K—
Max output164K—
Input $ / M tokens$0.24—
Output $ / M tokens$0.90—
Results tracked6022

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding DeepSeek-V3 leads

DeepSeek-V3: 42.3 (#106), Mistral: 33.8 (#250)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek-V3Mistral
LMArena Coding13681162
Aider Polyglot55.1%—
SciCode35.8%—
WeirdML36.1%—
BigCodeBench Instruct50%—
LiveBench Coding70.9%—
BigCodeBench Complete62.2%—
HumanEval+86.6%—
MBPP+73%—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

DeepSeek-V3: —, Mistral: —

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek-V3Mistral
METR Time Horizons49.6%—

Reasoning Mistral leads

DeepSeek-V3: 20.5 (#236), Mistral: 22.2 (#200)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek-V3Mistral
LMArena Hard Prompts13651149
SimpleBench27.2%—
Kagi LLM Benchmark52.3%—
CritPt0%—
LiveBench Reasoning65.8%—
DTBench64.8%—
LiveBench Data Analysis60.9%—
LMCA15.5%—
BIG-Bench Hard87.5%—
Epoch Capabilities Index135.94—
ForecastBench59.1—
HellaSwag88.9%—
LiveBench66.9%—
PIQA84.7%—
WinoGrande85.2%—

Math DeepSeek-V3 leads

DeepSeek-V3: 32.1 (#219), Mistral: 22.3 (#278)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek-V3Mistral
Omni-MATH40.3%7.2%
LMArena Math13731180
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-202537.8%—
LiveBench Math73.5%—
MATH Level 575.5%—
FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set)1.7%—

Knowledge DeepSeek-V3 leads

DeepSeek-V3: 37.5 (#155), Mistral: 16.6 (#288)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek-V3Mistral
MMLU-Pro72.3%27.7%
GPQA (HELM)53.8%30.3%
LMArena Expert13511125
GPQA Diamond67.6%—
Confabulations26.1%—
Vectara Hallucination Rate6.1%—
ARC (AI2) Challenge95.3%—
MMLU87.2%—
TriviaQA82.9%—

Multilingual DeepSeek-V3 leads

DeepSeek-V3: 48.5 (#143), Mistral: 32.8 (#254)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek-V3Mistral
LMArena Non-English13581129
LMArena Chinese13911109
LMArena French13851180
LMArena German13741155
LMArena Japanese13331013
LMArena Korean13191032
LMArena Russian13731168
LMArena Spanish13581143

Instruction Following DeepSeek-V3 leads

DeepSeek-V3: 72.8 (#130), Mistral: 52.6 (#288)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek-V3Mistral
IFEval83.2%56.8%
LMArena Instruction Following13451152
LiveBench Instruction Following81.5%—

Long Context Too close to call

DeepSeek-V3: 34.0 (#253), Mistral: 35.0 (#245)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek-V3Mistral
LMArena Longer Query13521153
Fiction.LiveBench50%—

Writing & Preference DeepSeek-V3 leads

DeepSeek-V3: 57.4 (#130), Mistral: 37.0 (#260)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek-V3Mistral
LMArena Text13751165
LMArena Creative Writing13641158
WildBench83%66%
LMArena Multi-Turn13891147
Short-Story Creative Writing77%—
EQ-Bench Creative Writing1472—
LiveBench Language49.1%—

Frequently asked questions

Is DeepSeek-V3 better than Mistral?

DeepSeek-V3 is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.5 to 29.9 on the Noometry Index.

Is DeepSeek-V3 or Mistral better for coding?

DeepSeek-V3 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 42.3 versus 33.8 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do DeepSeek-V3 and Mistral share?

22 benchmarks have published results for both models. DeepSeek-V3 has 60 scored results on Noometry and Mistral has 22.

Related comparisons

Go deeper