Model comparison

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs Longcat Flash Chat

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 50.3 to 41.5 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 15 shared benchmarks.

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash DeepSeek

50.3

Rank #40 Confirmed

Longcat Flash Chat Meituan

41.5

Rank #121 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 15 benchmarks with published results for both. DeepSeek V4.1 Flash scores higher in 8 categories and Longcat Flash Chat in 0 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in reasoning, where DeepSeek V4.1 Flash leads 46.2 to 18.3.
  • The biggest single-benchmark swing is NYT Connections (extended): 89.6% for DeepSeek V4.1 Flash and 17.7% for Longcat Flash Chat.

Side by side

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash and Longcat Flash Chat specifications
DeepSeek V4.1 FlashLongcat Flash Chat
ProviderDeepSeekMeituan
Noometry Index50.341.5
Released2026-09-09—
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window1M—
Max output393K—
Input $ / M tokens$0.15—
Output $ / M tokens$0.60—
Results tracked2519

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding DeepSeek V4.1 Flash leads

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash: 52.8 (#29), Longcat Flash Chat: 42.9 (#85)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4.1 FlashLongcat Flash Chat
LMArena Coding15111471
LMArena WebDev1620—
SciCode51.9%—
ALE-Bench1,092—

Reasoning DeepSeek V4.1 Flash leads

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash: 46.2 (#39), Longcat Flash Chat: 18.3 (#267)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4.1 FlashLongcat Flash Chat
NYT Connections (extended)89.6%17.7%
LMArena Hard Prompts14851440
Kagi LLM Benchmark—43.9%
CritPt14.3%—
DTBench89.9%—
LMCA47%—
Surface Evolver Bench46.3%—
Epoch Capabilities Index155.01—

Math DeepSeek V4.1 Flash leads

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash: 48.4 (#52), Longcat Flash Chat: 36.6 (#107)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4.1 FlashLongcat Flash Chat
LMArena Math14931441
ProofBench54%—

Knowledge DeepSeek V4.1 Flash leads

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash: 41.6 (#97), Longcat Flash Chat: 40.0 (#111)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4.1 FlashLongcat Flash Chat
LMArena Expert15051454

Multilingual DeepSeek V4.1 Flash leads

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash: 55.5 (#29), Longcat Flash Chat: 52.1 (#95)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4.1 FlashLongcat Flash Chat
LMArena Non-English14521404
LMArena Chinese15061465
LMArena French14481457
LMArena Russian14731396
LMArena Spanish14991445
LMArena German—1409
LMArena Japanese—1373
LMArena Korean—1372

Instruction Following DeepSeek V4.1 Flash leads

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash: 77.6 (#24), Longcat Flash Chat: 74.6 (#92)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4.1 FlashLongcat Flash Chat
LMArena Instruction Following14751411

Long Context DeepSeek V4.1 Flash leads

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash: 45.2 (#46), Longcat Flash Chat: 43.5 (#89)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4.1 FlashLongcat Flash Chat
LMArena Longer Query14761425

Writing & Preference DeepSeek V4.1 Flash leads

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash: 65.8 (#43), Longcat Flash Chat: 61.2 (#88)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4.1 FlashLongcat Flash Chat
LMArena Text14651427
LMArena Creative Writing14361388
LMArena Multi-Turn14601418
EQ-Bench Creative Writing1540—

Frequently asked questions

Is DeepSeek V4.1 Flash better than Longcat Flash Chat?

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 50.3 to 41.5 on the Noometry Index.

Is DeepSeek V4.1 Flash or Longcat Flash Chat better for coding?

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash scores higher on coding benchmarks: 52.8 versus 42.9 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do DeepSeek V4.1 Flash and Longcat Flash Chat share?

15 benchmarks have published results for both models. DeepSeek V4.1 Flash has 25 scored results on Noometry and Longcat Flash Chat has 19.

Related comparisons

Go deeper