Model comparison

DeepSeek V4 Flash vs Grok 4.7

DeepSeek V4 Flash and Grok 4.7 score almost the same on the Noometry Index (53.6 vs 53.1), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.

Last verified . 31 shared benchmarks.

DeepSeek V4 Flash DeepSeek

53.6

Rank #35 Confirmed

Grok 4.7 xAI

53.1

Rank #37 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 31 benchmarks with published results for both. DeepSeek V4 Flash scores higher in 5 categories and Grok 4.7 in 3 categories; 6 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in coding, where Grok 4.7 leads 58.0 to 47.9.
  • The biggest single-benchmark swing is FrontierCode: 18.8% for DeepSeek V4 Flash and 47.6% for Grok 4.7.
  • DeepSeek V4 Flash is cheaper at $0.15 / $0.60 per million input/output tokens, against $2 / $6 for Grok 4.7.
  • DeepSeek V4 Flash accepts more context: 1M tokens versus 500K.
  • DeepSeek V4 Flash has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

DeepSeek V4 Flash and Grok 4.7 specifications
DeepSeek V4 FlashGrok 4.7
ProviderDeepSeekxAI
Noometry Index53.653.1
Released2026-04-242026-09-21
WeightsOpenProprietary
Context window1M500K
Max output393K500K
Input $ / M tokens$0.15$2
Output $ / M tokens$0.60$6
Results tracked4139

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Grok 4.7 leads

DeepSeek V4 Flash: 47.9 (#59), Grok 4.7: 58.0 (#18)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4 FlashGrok 4.7
FrontierCode18.8%47.6%
LMArena WebDev15821639
SciCode49.9%57.8%
LMArena Coding14571427
CursorBench—46.3%
FrontierSWE—29.5%
WeirdML63%—
ALE-Bench1,306—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

DeepSeek V4 Flash: —, Grok 4.7: 36.7 (#37)

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4 FlashGrok 4.7
APEX-Agents—54.6%
GDP.pdf—22.8%
Vending-Bench 2—10,537

Reasoning DeepSeek V4 Flash leads

DeepSeek V4 Flash: 53.7 (#30), Grok 4.7: 49.1 (#40)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4 FlashGrok 4.7
NYT Connections (extended)89.6%76.8%
CritPt16.6%18%
Chess Puzzles33%38%
LMArena Hard Prompts14441413
Mystery Game Puzzles34%29%
DTBench90.9%96%
LMCA41.7%49.4%
Epoch Capabilities Index154.49153.53
ARC-AGI-261.4%—
SimpleBench61.1%—
Kagi LLM Benchmark52.2%—
ARC-AGI-189%—

Math DeepSeek V4 Flash leads

DeepSeek V4 Flash: 60.3 (#37), Grok 4.7: 57.8 (#39)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4 FlashGrok 4.7
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)57.5%53%
FrontierMath Tier 424.4%17.1%
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-202594.4%98.1%
ProofBench56%34%
LMArena Math14271407
MathArena Final-Answer Competitions76.5%—

Knowledge Grok 4.7 leads

DeepSeek V4 Flash: 55.4 (#48), Grok 4.7: 62.8 (#22)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4 FlashGrok 4.7
GPQA Diamond91%92.7%
SimpleQA Verified33.6%56%
LMArena Expert14411422

Multimodal Not comparable

DeepSeek V4 Flash: —, Grok 4.7: 35.5 (#87)

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4 FlashGrok 4.7
LMArena Vision—1228
Blueprint-Bench 2—32.5%
Furniture Assembly—20.8%

Multilingual DeepSeek V4 Flash leads

DeepSeek V4 Flash: 53.0 (#72), Grok 4.7: 50.8 (#116)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4 FlashGrok 4.7
LMArena Non-English14201389
LMArena Chinese14681455
LMArena French14391455
LMArena Russian14281397
LMArena Spanish14361400
LMArena German1418—
LMArena Japanese1406—
LMArena Korean1384—

Instruction Following Too close to call

DeepSeek V4 Flash: 74.9 (#81), Grok 4.7: 74.1 (#105)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4 FlashGrok 4.7
LMArena Instruction Following14211404

Long Context Too close to call

DeepSeek V4 Flash: 43.8 (#85), Grok 4.7: 43.1 (#104)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4 FlashGrok 4.7
LMArena Longer Query14341413

Writing & Preference Grok 4.7 leads

DeepSeek V4 Flash: 63.8 (#61), Grok 4.7: 70.0 (#24)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4 FlashGrok 4.7
LMArena Text14321399
LMArena Creative Writing14031391
EQ-Bench Creative Writing15592007
LMArena Multi-Turn14491393

Frequently asked questions

Is DeepSeek V4 Flash better than Grok 4.7?

DeepSeek V4 Flash and Grok 4.7 score almost the same on the Noometry Index (53.6 vs 53.1), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.

Which is cheaper, DeepSeek V4 Flash or Grok 4.7?

DeepSeek V4 Flash is cheaper. It lists at $0.15 per million input tokens and $0.60 per million output tokens; Grok 4.7 lists at $2 and $6.

Is DeepSeek V4 Flash or Grok 4.7 better for coding?

Grok 4.7 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 58.0 versus 47.9 in the Noometry coding category.

Which has the bigger context window?

DeepSeek V4 Flash does, with 1M tokens against 500K.

How many benchmarks do DeepSeek V4 Flash and Grok 4.7 share?

31 benchmarks have published results for both models. DeepSeek V4 Flash has 41 scored results on Noometry and Grok 4.7 has 39.

Related comparisons

Go deeper