Model comparison

DeepSeek V4 Flash vs Pixtral 12B

DeepSeek V4 Flash has enough public results to be ranked (#32); Pixtral 12B does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.

Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.

DeepSeek V4 Flash DeepSeek

53.6

Rank #32 Confirmed

Pixtral 12B Mistral AI

30.8

Unranked Sparse

Summary

  • Pixtral 12B is cheaper at $0.15 / $0.15 per million input/output tokens, against $0.15 / $0.60 for DeepSeek V4 Flash.
  • DeepSeek V4 Flash accepts more context: 1M tokens versus 128K.

Side by side

DeepSeek V4 Flash and Pixtral 12B specifications
DeepSeek V4 FlashPixtral 12B
ProviderDeepSeekMistral AI
Noometry Index53.630.8
Released2026-04-242024-09-01
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window1M128K
Max output393K128K
Input $ / M tokens$0.15$0.15
Output $ / M tokens$0.60$0.15
Results tracked412

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Not comparable

DeepSeek V4 Flash: 47.6 (#56), Pixtral 12B: —

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4 FlashPixtral 12B
FrontierCode18.8%—
LMArena WebDev1581—
SciCode49.9%—
WeirdML63%—
LMArena Coding1457—
ALE-Bench1,306—

Reasoning Not comparable

DeepSeek V4 Flash: 53.7 (#25), Pixtral 12B: —

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4 FlashPixtral 12B
ARC-AGI-261.4%—
SimpleBench61.1%—
Kagi LLM Benchmark52.2%—
NYT Connections (extended)89.6%—
ARC-AGI-189%—
CritPt16.6%—
Chess Puzzles33%—
LMArena Hard Prompts1443—
Mystery Game Puzzles34%—
DTBench90.9%—
LMCA41.7%—
Epoch Capabilities Index154.51—

Math Not comparable

DeepSeek V4 Flash: 60.0 (#31), Pixtral 12B: —

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4 FlashPixtral 12B
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)57.5%—
FrontierMath Tier 424.4%—
MathArena Final-Answer Competitions76.5%—
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-202594.4%—
ProofBench56%—
LMArena Math1427—

Knowledge Not comparable

DeepSeek V4 Flash: 55.5 (#43), Pixtral 12B: —

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4 FlashPixtral 12B
GPQA Diamond91%—
SimpleQA Verified33.6%—
LMArena Expert1441—

Multimodal Not comparable

DeepSeek V4 Flash: —, Pixtral 12B: 23.4 (#122)

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4 FlashPixtral 12B
LMArena Vision—1008
GeoBench—37%

Multilingual Not comparable

DeepSeek V4 Flash: 53.2 (#71), Pixtral 12B: —

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4 FlashPixtral 12B
LMArena Non-English1420—
LMArena Chinese1467—
LMArena French1438—
LMArena German1418—
LMArena Japanese1403—
LMArena Korean1383—
LMArena Russian1428—
LMArena Spanish1437—

Instruction Following Not comparable

DeepSeek V4 Flash: 75.1 (#76), Pixtral 12B: —

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4 FlashPixtral 12B
LMArena Instruction Following1421—

Long Context Not comparable

DeepSeek V4 Flash: 43.8 (#81), Pixtral 12B: —

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4 FlashPixtral 12B
LMArena Longer Query1435—

Writing & Preference Not comparable

DeepSeek V4 Flash: 64.0 (#59), Pixtral 12B: —

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4 FlashPixtral 12B
LMArena Text1432—
LMArena Creative Writing1403—
EQ-Bench Creative Writing1559—
LMArena Multi-Turn1449—

Frequently asked questions

Is DeepSeek V4 Flash better than Pixtral 12B?

DeepSeek V4 Flash has enough public results to be ranked (#32); Pixtral 12B does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.

Which is cheaper, DeepSeek V4 Flash or Pixtral 12B?

Pixtral 12B is cheaper. It lists at $0.15 per million input tokens and $0.15 per million output tokens; DeepSeek V4 Flash lists at $0.15 and $0.60.

Which has the bigger context window?

DeepSeek V4 Flash does, with 1M tokens against 128K.

How many benchmarks do DeepSeek V4 Flash and Pixtral 12B share?

0 benchmarks have published results for both models. DeepSeek V4 Flash has 41 scored results on Noometry and Pixtral 12B has 2.

Related comparisons

Go deeper