Model comparison

DeepSeek V4 Flash vs QwQ Plus

DeepSeek V4 Flash has enough public results to be ranked (#32); QwQ Plus does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.

Last verified . 1 shared benchmarks.

DeepSeek V4 Flash DeepSeek

53.6

Rank #32 Confirmed

QwQ Plus Alibaba (Qwen)

37.9

Unranked Sparse

Summary

  • They share 1 benchmark with published results for both. DeepSeek V4 Flash scores higher in 1 category and QwQ Plus in 0 categories; one gap is clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in knowledge, where DeepSeek V4 Flash leads 55.5 to 36.5.
  • The biggest single-benchmark swing is GPQA Diamond: 91% for DeepSeek V4 Flash and 65.4% for QwQ Plus.
  • DeepSeek V4 Flash is cheaper at $0.15 / $0.60 per million input/output tokens, against $0.80 / $2.40 for QwQ Plus.
  • DeepSeek V4 Flash accepts more context: 1M tokens versus 131K.
  • DeepSeek V4 Flash has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

DeepSeek V4 Flash and QwQ Plus specifications
DeepSeek V4 FlashQwQ Plus
ProviderDeepSeekAlibaba (Qwen)
Noometry Index53.637.9
Released2026-04-242025-03-05
WeightsOpenProprietary
Context window1M131K
Max output393K8K
Input $ / M tokens$0.15$0.80
Output $ / M tokens$0.60$2.40
Results tracked411

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Not comparable

DeepSeek V4 Flash: 47.6 (#56), QwQ Plus: —

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4 FlashQwQ Plus
FrontierCode18.8%—
LMArena WebDev1581—
SciCode49.9%—
WeirdML63%—
LMArena Coding1457—
ALE-Bench1,306—

Reasoning Not comparable

DeepSeek V4 Flash: 53.7 (#25), QwQ Plus: —

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4 FlashQwQ Plus
ARC-AGI-261.4%—
SimpleBench61.1%—
Kagi LLM Benchmark52.2%—
NYT Connections (extended)89.6%—
ARC-AGI-189%—
CritPt16.6%—
Chess Puzzles33%—
LMArena Hard Prompts1443—
Mystery Game Puzzles34%—
DTBench90.9%—
LMCA41.7%—
Epoch Capabilities Index154.51—

Math Not comparable

DeepSeek V4 Flash: 60.0 (#31), QwQ Plus: —

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4 FlashQwQ Plus
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)57.5%—
FrontierMath Tier 424.4%—
MathArena Final-Answer Competitions76.5%—
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-202594.4%—
ProofBench56%—
LMArena Math1427—

Knowledge DeepSeek V4 Flash leads

DeepSeek V4 Flash: 55.5 (#43), QwQ Plus: 36.5

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4 FlashQwQ Plus
GPQA Diamond91%65.4%
SimpleQA Verified33.6%—
LMArena Expert1441—

Multilingual Not comparable

DeepSeek V4 Flash: 53.2 (#71), QwQ Plus: —

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4 FlashQwQ Plus
LMArena Non-English1420—
LMArena Chinese1467—
LMArena French1438—
LMArena German1418—
LMArena Japanese1403—
LMArena Korean1383—
LMArena Russian1428—
LMArena Spanish1437—

Instruction Following Not comparable

DeepSeek V4 Flash: 75.1 (#76), QwQ Plus: —

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4 FlashQwQ Plus
LMArena Instruction Following1421—

Long Context Not comparable

DeepSeek V4 Flash: 43.8 (#81), QwQ Plus: —

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4 FlashQwQ Plus
LMArena Longer Query1435—

Writing & Preference Not comparable

DeepSeek V4 Flash: 64.0 (#59), QwQ Plus: —

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4 FlashQwQ Plus
LMArena Text1432—
LMArena Creative Writing1403—
EQ-Bench Creative Writing1559—
LMArena Multi-Turn1449—

Frequently asked questions

Is DeepSeek V4 Flash better than QwQ Plus?

DeepSeek V4 Flash has enough public results to be ranked (#32); QwQ Plus does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.

Which is cheaper, DeepSeek V4 Flash or QwQ Plus?

DeepSeek V4 Flash is cheaper. It lists at $0.15 per million input tokens and $0.60 per million output tokens; QwQ Plus lists at $0.80 and $2.40.

Which has the bigger context window?

DeepSeek V4 Flash does, with 1M tokens against 131K.

How many benchmarks do DeepSeek V4 Flash and QwQ Plus share?

1 benchmark has published results for both models. DeepSeek V4 Flash has 41 scored results on Noometry and QwQ Plus has 1.

Related comparisons

Go deeper