Model comparison

DeepSeek V4 Pro vs Grok 4.1

DeepSeek V4 Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 54.3 to 41.5 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 18 shared benchmarks.

DeepSeek V4 Pro DeepSeek

54.3

Rank #31 Confirmed

Grok 4.1 xAI

41.5

Rank #134 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 18 benchmarks with published results for both. DeepSeek V4 Pro scores higher in 8 categories and Grok 4.1 in 1 category; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in reasoning, where DeepSeek V4 Pro leads 56.5 to 29.5.
  • DeepSeek V4 Pro has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

DeepSeek V4 Pro and Grok 4.1 specifications
DeepSeek V4 ProGrok 4.1
ProviderDeepSeekxAI
Noometry Index54.341.5
Released2026-04-242025-11-17
WeightsOpenProprietary
Context window1M—
Max output393K—
Input $ / M tokens$0.66—
Output $ / M tokens$1.98—
Results tracked4819

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding DeepSeek V4 Pro leads

DeepSeek V4 Pro: 52.4 (#34), Grok 4.1: 33.7 (#253)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4 ProGrok 4.1
LMArena WebDev15821214
LMArena Coding14701445
SWE-bench Verified77.6%—
FrontierCode28.6%—
SciCode51%—
WeirdML66.2%—
ALE-Bench1,403—

Agentic & Tool Use Grok 4.1 leads

DeepSeek V4 Pro: 32.8 (#58), Grok 4.1: 34.1 (#49)

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4 ProGrok 4.1
APEX-Agents47.3%—
Cybench—39%
Vending-Bench 23,285—

Reasoning DeepSeek V4 Pro leads

DeepSeek V4 Pro: 56.5 (#24), Grok 4.1: 29.5 (#91)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4 ProGrok 4.1
LMArena Hard Prompts14611435
ARC-AGI-261.3%—
Kagi LLM Benchmark53.5%—
NYT Connections (extended)91.3%—
ARC-AGI-190.5%—
CritPt18%—
Chess Puzzles47%—
Mystery Game Puzzles43%—
DTBench93.9%—
LMCA45.5%—
Surface Evolver Bench40%—
Epoch Capabilities Index155.31—
ForecastBench56.1—

Math DeepSeek V4 Pro leads

DeepSeek V4 Pro: 64.8 (#30), Grok 4.1: 38.9 (#120)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4 ProGrok 4.1
LMArena Math14551422
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)64.6%—
FrontierMath Tier 426.8%—
MathArena Final-Answer Competitions76.6%—
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-202598.6%—
ProofBench50%—

Knowledge DeepSeek V4 Pro leads

DeepSeek V4 Pro: 59.5 (#31), Grok 4.1: 39.5 (#133)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4 ProGrok 4.1
LMArena Expert14641417
GPQA Diamond91.7%—
SimpleQA Verified52.9%—
Vectara Hallucination Rate8.6%—

Multilingual Too close to call

DeepSeek V4 Pro: 54.4 (#45), Grok 4.1: 53.4 (#68)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4 ProGrok 4.1
LMArena Non-English14391425
LMArena Chinese14861465
LMArena French14721448
LMArena German14581446
LMArena Japanese14451397
LMArena Korean14471407
LMArena Russian14531434
LMArena Spanish14581438

Instruction Following DeepSeek V4 Pro leads

DeepSeek V4 Pro: 76.1 (#47), Grok 4.1: 73.8 (#111)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4 ProGrok 4.1
LMArena Instruction Following14481400

Long Context DeepSeek V4 Pro leads

DeepSeek V4 Pro: 45.0 (#51), Grok 4.1: 43.2 (#100)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4 ProGrok 4.1
LMArena Longer Query14581416
CL-bench Life13.5%—

Writing & Preference DeepSeek V4 Pro leads

DeepSeek V4 Pro: 65.5 (#46), Grok 4.1: 62.4 (#75)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4 ProGrok 4.1
LMArena Text14511437
LMArena Creative Writing14461411
LMArena Multi-Turn14671437
EQ-Bench Creative Writing1553—
EQ-Bench 41166—

Frequently asked questions

Is DeepSeek V4 Pro better than Grok 4.1?

DeepSeek V4 Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 54.3 to 41.5 on the Noometry Index.

Is DeepSeek V4 Pro or Grok 4.1 better for coding?

DeepSeek V4 Pro scores higher on coding benchmarks: 52.4 versus 33.7 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do DeepSeek V4 Pro and Grok 4.1 share?

18 benchmarks have published results for both models. DeepSeek V4 Pro has 48 scored results on Noometry and Grok 4.1 has 19.

Related comparisons

Go deeper