Model comparison

DeepSeek V4 Pro vs Grok 4.7

DeepSeek V4 Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 54.2 to 46.6 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 18 shared benchmarks.

DeepSeek V4 Pro DeepSeek

54.2

Rank #28 Confirmed

Grok 4.7 xAI

46.6

Rank #56 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 18 benchmarks with published results for both. DeepSeek V4 Pro scores higher in 6 categories and Grok 4.7 in 2 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in math, where DeepSeek V4 Pro leads 64.6 to 41.1.
  • The biggest single-benchmark swing is ProofBench: 50% for DeepSeek V4 Pro and 34% for Grok 4.7.
  • DeepSeek V4 Pro is cheaper at $0.43 / $0.87 per million input/output tokens, against $2 / $6 for Grok 4.7.
  • DeepSeek V4 Pro accepts more context: 1M tokens versus 500K.
  • DeepSeek V4 Pro has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

DeepSeek V4 Pro and Grok 4.7 specifications
DeepSeek V4 ProGrok 4.7
ProviderDeepSeekxAI
Noometry Index54.246.6
Released2026-04-242026-09-21
WeightsOpenProprietary
Context window1M500K
Max output393K500K
Input $ / M tokens$0.43$2
Output $ / M tokens$0.87$6
Results tracked4821

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Grok 4.7 leads

DeepSeek V4 Pro: 52.2 (#31), Grok 4.7: 55.0 (#23)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4 ProGrok 4.7
LMArena WebDev15821636
SciCode51%57.4%
LMArena Coding14701423
SWE-bench Verified77.6%—
FrontierCode28.6%—
CursorBench—46.3%
FrontierSWE—29.5%
WeirdML66.2%—
ALE-Bench1,403—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

DeepSeek V4 Pro: 32.7 (#54), Grok 4.7: —

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4 ProGrok 4.7
APEX-Agents47.3%—
Vending-Bench 23,285—

Reasoning DeepSeek V4 Pro leads

DeepSeek V4 Pro: 56.4 (#22), Grok 4.7: 40.1 (#49)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4 ProGrok 4.7
NYT Connections (extended)91.3%76.8%
CritPt18%17.7%
LMArena Hard Prompts14611409
ARC-AGI-261.3%—
Kagi LLM Benchmark53.5%—
ARC-AGI-190.5%—
Chess Puzzles47%—
Mystery Game Puzzles43%—
DTBench93.9%—
LMCA45.5%—
Surface Evolver Bench40%—
Epoch Capabilities Index155.39—
ForecastBench56.1—

Math DeepSeek V4 Pro leads

DeepSeek V4 Pro: 64.6 (#24), Grok 4.7: 41.1 (#73)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4 ProGrok 4.7
ProofBench50%34%
LMArena Math14551393
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)64.6%—
FrontierMath Tier 426.8%—
MathArena Final-Answer Competitions76.6%—
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-202598.6%—

Knowledge DeepSeek V4 Pro leads

DeepSeek V4 Pro: 59.5 (#28), Grok 4.7: 38.7 (#130)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4 ProGrok 4.7
LMArena Expert14631413
GPQA Diamond91.7%—
SimpleQA Verified52.9%—
Vectara Hallucination Rate8.6%—

Multimodal Not comparable

DeepSeek V4 Pro: —, Grok 4.7: 28.8 (#107)

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4 ProGrok 4.7
Furniture Assembly—20.8%

Multilingual DeepSeek V4 Pro leads

DeepSeek V4 Pro: 54.5 (#44), Grok 4.7: 51.2 (#108)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4 ProGrok 4.7
LMArena Non-English14381392
LMArena Chinese14861476
LMArena Russian14521396
LMArena French1473—
LMArena German1458—
LMArena Japanese1448—
LMArena Korean1452—
LMArena Spanish1457—

Instruction Following DeepSeek V4 Pro leads

DeepSeek V4 Pro: 76.3 (#44), Grok 4.7: 74.3 (#98)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4 ProGrok 4.7
LMArena Instruction Following14481406

Long Context DeepSeek V4 Pro leads

DeepSeek V4 Pro: 45.0 (#49), Grok 4.7: 43.2 (#97)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4 ProGrok 4.7
LMArena Longer Query14591416
CL-bench Life13.5%—

Writing & Preference Grok 4.7 leads

DeepSeek V4 Pro: 65.6 (#45), Grok 4.7: 70.1 (#23)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4 ProGrok 4.7
LMArena Text14511397
LMArena Creative Writing14461391
EQ-Bench Creative Writing15532007
LMArena Multi-Turn14671389
EQ-Bench 41166—

Frequently asked questions

Is DeepSeek V4 Pro better than Grok 4.7?

DeepSeek V4 Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 54.2 to 46.6 on the Noometry Index.

Which is cheaper, DeepSeek V4 Pro or Grok 4.7?

DeepSeek V4 Pro is cheaper. It lists at $0.43 per million input tokens and $0.87 per million output tokens; Grok 4.7 lists at $2 and $6.

Is DeepSeek V4 Pro or Grok 4.7 better for coding?

Grok 4.7 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 55.0 versus 52.2 in the Noometry coding category.

Which has the bigger context window?

DeepSeek V4 Pro does, with 1M tokens against 500K.

How many benchmarks do DeepSeek V4 Pro and Grok 4.7 share?

18 benchmarks have published results for both models. DeepSeek V4 Pro has 48 scored results on Noometry and Grok 4.7 has 21.

Related comparisons

Go deeper