Model comparison
DeepSeek V4 Pro vs Llama 3-70B
DeepSeek V4 Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 54.3 to 28.8 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 23 shared benchmarks.
DeepSeek
MetaSummary
- They share 23 benchmarks with published results for both. DeepSeek V4 Pro scores higher in 9 categories and Llama 3-70B in 0 categories; 9 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in math, where DeepSeek V4 Pro leads 64.8 to 12.8.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025: 98.6% for DeepSeek V4 Pro and 4.3% for Llama 3-70B.
Side by side
| DeepSeek V4 Pro | Llama 3-70B | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | DeepSeek | Meta |
| Noometry Index | 54.3 | 28.8 |
| Released | 2026-04-24 | 2024-04-18 |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | 1M | — |
| Max output | 393K | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | $0.66 | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | $1.98 | — |
| Results tracked | 48 | 31 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding DeepSeek V4 Pro leads
DeepSeek V4 Pro: 52.4 (#34), Llama 3-70B: 35.8 (#218)
| Benchmark | DeepSeek V4 Pro | Llama 3-70B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1470 | 1206 |
| SWE-bench Verified | 77.6% | — |
| FrontierCode | 28.6% | — |
| LMArena WebDev | 1582 | — |
| SciCode | 51% | — |
| WeirdML | 66.2% | — |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | — | 43.6% |
| BigCodeBench Complete | — | 54.5% |
| ALE-Bench | 1,403 | — |
| HumanEval+ | — | 72% |
| MBPP+ | — | 69% |
Agentic & Tool Use DeepSeek V4 Pro leads
DeepSeek V4 Pro: 32.8 (#58), Llama 3-70B: 21.1 (#139)
| Benchmark | DeepSeek V4 Pro | Llama 3-70B |
|---|---|---|
| APEX-Agents | 47.3% | — |
| Cybench | — | 5% |
| Vending-Bench 2 | 3,285 | — |
Reasoning DeepSeek V4 Pro leads
DeepSeek V4 Pro: 56.5 (#24), Llama 3-70B: 18.0 (#288)
| Benchmark | DeepSeek V4 Pro | Llama 3-70B |
|---|---|---|
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 53.5% | 35.1% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1461 | 1195 |
| DTBench | 93.9% | 54.2% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 155.31 | 122.93 |
| ForecastBench | 56.1 | 57.1 |
| ARC-AGI-2 | 61.3% | — |
| NYT Connections (extended) | 91.3% | — |
| ARC-AGI-1 | 90.5% | — |
| CritPt | 18% | — |
| Chess Puzzles | 47% | — |
| Mystery Game Puzzles | 43% | — |
| LMCA | 45.5% | — |
| Surface Evolver Bench | 40% | — |
| WinoGrande | — | 83.5% |
Math DeepSeek V4 Pro leads
DeepSeek V4 Pro: 64.8 (#30), Llama 3-70B: 12.8 (#305)
| Benchmark | DeepSeek V4 Pro | Llama 3-70B |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 98.6% | 4.3% |
| LMArena Math | 1455 | 1218 |
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | 64.6% | — |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 | 26.8% | — |
| MathArena Final-Answer Competitions | 76.6% | — |
| ProofBench | 50% | — |
| MATH Level 5 | — | 22.6% |
Knowledge DeepSeek V4 Pro leads
DeepSeek V4 Pro: 59.5 (#31), Llama 3-70B: 20.8 (#277)
| Benchmark | DeepSeek V4 Pro | Llama 3-70B |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 91.7% | 40.6% |
| LMArena Expert | 1464 | 1149 |
| SimpleQA Verified | 52.9% | — |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | 8.6% | — |
| MMLU | — | 79.3% |
Multilingual DeepSeek V4 Pro leads
DeepSeek V4 Pro: 54.4 (#45), Llama 3-70B: 33.6 (#251)
| Benchmark | DeepSeek V4 Pro | Llama 3-70B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1439 | 1142 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1486 | 1114 |
| LMArena French | 1472 | 1232 |
| LMArena German | 1458 | 1169 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1445 | 1017 |
| LMArena Korean | 1447 | 1017 |
| LMArena Russian | 1453 | 1159 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1458 | 1241 |
Instruction Following DeepSeek V4 Pro leads
DeepSeek V4 Pro: 76.1 (#47), Llama 3-70B: 62.5 (#238)
| Benchmark | DeepSeek V4 Pro | Llama 3-70B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1448 | 1194 |
Long Context DeepSeek V4 Pro leads
DeepSeek V4 Pro: 45.0 (#51), Llama 3-70B: 35.6 (#240)
| Benchmark | DeepSeek V4 Pro | Llama 3-70B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1458 | 1174 |
| CL-bench Life | 13.5% | — |
Writing & Preference DeepSeek V4 Pro leads
DeepSeek V4 Pro: 65.5 (#46), Llama 3-70B: 42.8 (#231)
| Benchmark | DeepSeek V4 Pro | Llama 3-70B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1451 | 1221 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1446 | 1210 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1467 | 1223 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 1553 | — |
| EQ-Bench 4 | 1166 | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is DeepSeek V4 Pro better than Llama 3-70B?
DeepSeek V4 Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 54.3 to 28.8 on the Noometry Index.
Is DeepSeek V4 Pro or Llama 3-70B better for coding?
DeepSeek V4 Pro scores higher on coding benchmarks: 52.4 versus 35.8 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do DeepSeek V4 Pro and Llama 3-70B share?
23 benchmarks have published results for both models. DeepSeek V4 Pro has 48 scored results on Noometry and Llama 3-70B has 31.