Model comparison

DeepSeek V4 Pro vs Mistral

DeepSeek V4 Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 54.3 to 29.9 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 17 shared benchmarks.

DeepSeek V4 Pro DeepSeek

54.3

Rank #31 Confirmed

Mistral Mistral AI

29.9

Rank #303 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 17 benchmarks with published results for both. DeepSeek V4 Pro scores higher in 8 categories and Mistral in 0 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in knowledge, where DeepSeek V4 Pro leads 59.5 to 16.6.
  • DeepSeek V4 Pro has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

DeepSeek V4 Pro and Mistral specifications
DeepSeek V4 ProMistral
ProviderDeepSeekMistral AI
Noometry Index54.329.9
Released2026-04-24—
WeightsOpenProprietary
Context window1M—
Max output393K—
Input $ / M tokens$0.66—
Output $ / M tokens$1.98—
Results tracked4822

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding DeepSeek V4 Pro leads

DeepSeek V4 Pro: 52.4 (#34), Mistral: 33.8 (#250)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4 ProMistral
LMArena Coding14701162
SWE-bench Verified77.6%—
FrontierCode28.6%—
LMArena WebDev1582—
SciCode51%—
WeirdML66.2%—
ALE-Bench1,403—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

DeepSeek V4 Pro: 32.8 (#58), Mistral: —

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4 ProMistral
APEX-Agents47.3%—
Vending-Bench 23,285—

Reasoning DeepSeek V4 Pro leads

DeepSeek V4 Pro: 56.5 (#24), Mistral: 22.2 (#200)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4 ProMistral
LMArena Hard Prompts14611149
ARC-AGI-261.3%—
Kagi LLM Benchmark53.5%—
NYT Connections (extended)91.3%—
ARC-AGI-190.5%—
CritPt18%—
Chess Puzzles47%—
Mystery Game Puzzles43%—
DTBench93.9%—
LMCA45.5%—
Surface Evolver Bench40%—
Epoch Capabilities Index155.31—
ForecastBench56.1—

Math DeepSeek V4 Pro leads

DeepSeek V4 Pro: 64.8 (#30), Mistral: 22.3 (#278)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4 ProMistral
LMArena Math14551180
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)64.6%—
FrontierMath Tier 426.8%—
MathArena Final-Answer Competitions76.6%—
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-202598.6%—
ProofBench50%—
Omni-MATH—7.2%

Knowledge DeepSeek V4 Pro leads

DeepSeek V4 Pro: 59.5 (#31), Mistral: 16.6 (#288)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4 ProMistral
LMArena Expert14641125
GPQA Diamond91.7%—
SimpleQA Verified52.9%—
MMLU-Pro—27.7%
Vectara Hallucination Rate8.6%—
GPQA (HELM)—30.3%

Multilingual DeepSeek V4 Pro leads

DeepSeek V4 Pro: 54.4 (#45), Mistral: 32.8 (#254)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4 ProMistral
LMArena Non-English14391129
LMArena Chinese14861109
LMArena French14721180
LMArena German14581155
LMArena Japanese14451013
LMArena Korean14471032
LMArena Russian14531168
LMArena Spanish14581143

Instruction Following DeepSeek V4 Pro leads

DeepSeek V4 Pro: 76.1 (#47), Mistral: 52.6 (#288)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4 ProMistral
LMArena Instruction Following14481152
IFEval—56.8%

Long Context DeepSeek V4 Pro leads

DeepSeek V4 Pro: 45.0 (#51), Mistral: 35.0 (#245)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4 ProMistral
LMArena Longer Query14581153
CL-bench Life13.5%—

Writing & Preference DeepSeek V4 Pro leads

DeepSeek V4 Pro: 65.5 (#46), Mistral: 37.0 (#260)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4 ProMistral
LMArena Text14511165
LMArena Creative Writing14461158
LMArena Multi-Turn14671147
EQ-Bench Creative Writing1553—
WildBench—66%
EQ-Bench 41166—

Frequently asked questions

Is DeepSeek V4 Pro better than Mistral?

DeepSeek V4 Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 54.3 to 29.9 on the Noometry Index.

Is DeepSeek V4 Pro or Mistral better for coding?

DeepSeek V4 Pro scores higher on coding benchmarks: 52.4 versus 33.8 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do DeepSeek V4 Pro and Mistral share?

17 benchmarks have published results for both models. DeepSeek V4 Pro has 48 scored results on Noometry and Mistral has 22.

Related comparisons

Go deeper