Model comparison

DeepSeek V4 Pro vs Mistral Small 3.2

DeepSeek V4 Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 54.3 to 31.2 on the Noometry Index. Mistral Small 3.2 costs 7.5× less per token, which makes it the better buy when DeepSeek V4 Pro's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

Last verified . 6 shared benchmarks.

DeepSeek V4 Pro DeepSeek

54.3

Rank #31 Confirmed

Mistral Small 3.2 Mistral AI

31.2

Rank #280 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 6 benchmarks with published results for both. DeepSeek V4 Pro scores higher in 4 categories and Mistral Small 3.2 in 0 categories; 4 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in math, where DeepSeek V4 Pro leads 64.8 to 26.3.
  • The biggest single-benchmark swing is OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025: 98.6% for DeepSeek V4 Pro and 30.3% for Mistral Small 3.2.
  • Mistral Small 3.2 is cheaper at $0.0938 / $0.25 per million input/output tokens, against $0.66 / $1.98 for DeepSeek V4 Pro.
  • DeepSeek V4 Pro accepts more context: 1M tokens versus 256K.

Side by side

DeepSeek V4 Pro and Mistral Small 3.2 specifications
DeepSeek V4 ProMistral Small 3.2
ProviderDeepSeekMistral AI
Noometry Index54.331.2
Released2026-04-242025-06-20
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window1M256K
Max output393K16K
Input $ / M tokens$0.66$0.0938
Output $ / M tokens$1.98$0.25
Results tracked486

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Not comparable

DeepSeek V4 Pro: 52.4 (#34), Mistral Small 3.2: —

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4 ProMistral Small 3.2
SWE-bench Verified77.6%—
FrontierCode28.6%—
LMArena WebDev1582—
SciCode51%—
WeirdML66.2%—
LMArena Coding1470—
ALE-Bench1,403—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

DeepSeek V4 Pro: 32.8 (#58), Mistral Small 3.2: —

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4 ProMistral Small 3.2
APEX-Agents47.3%—
Vending-Bench 23,285—

Reasoning DeepSeek V4 Pro leads

DeepSeek V4 Pro: 56.5 (#24), Mistral Small 3.2: 18.1 (#287)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4 ProMistral Small 3.2
Kagi LLM Benchmark53.5%40.4%
Chess Puzzles47%1%
Epoch Capabilities Index155.31131.74
ARC-AGI-261.3%—
NYT Connections (extended)91.3%—
ARC-AGI-190.5%—
CritPt18%—
LMArena Hard Prompts1461—
Mystery Game Puzzles43%—
DTBench93.9%—
LMCA45.5%—
Surface Evolver Bench40%—
ForecastBench56.1—

Math DeepSeek V4 Pro leads

DeepSeek V4 Pro: 64.8 (#30), Mistral Small 3.2: 26.3 (#260)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4 ProMistral Small 3.2
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-202598.6%30.3%
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)64.6%—
FrontierMath Tier 426.8%—
MathArena Final-Answer Competitions76.6%—
ProofBench50%—
LMArena Math1455—

Knowledge DeepSeek V4 Pro leads

DeepSeek V4 Pro: 59.5 (#31), Mistral Small 3.2: 26.7 (#256)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4 ProMistral Small 3.2
GPQA Diamond91.7%49.1%
SimpleQA Verified52.9%—
Vectara Hallucination Rate8.6%—
LMArena Expert1464—

Multilingual Not comparable

DeepSeek V4 Pro: 54.4 (#45), Mistral Small 3.2: —

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4 ProMistral Small 3.2
LMArena Non-English1439—
LMArena Chinese1486—
LMArena French1472—
LMArena German1458—
LMArena Japanese1445—
LMArena Korean1447—
LMArena Russian1453—
LMArena Spanish1458—

Instruction Following Not comparable

DeepSeek V4 Pro: 76.1 (#47), Mistral Small 3.2: —

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4 ProMistral Small 3.2
LMArena Instruction Following1448—

Long Context Not comparable

DeepSeek V4 Pro: 45.0 (#51), Mistral Small 3.2: —

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4 ProMistral Small 3.2
CL-bench Life13.5%—
LMArena Longer Query1458—

Writing & Preference DeepSeek V4 Pro leads

DeepSeek V4 Pro: 65.5 (#46), Mistral Small 3.2: 45.0 (#224)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4 ProMistral Small 3.2
EQ-Bench Creative Writing15531255
LMArena Text1451—
LMArena Creative Writing1446—
EQ-Bench 41166—
LMArena Multi-Turn1467—

Frequently asked questions

Is DeepSeek V4 Pro better than Mistral Small 3.2?

DeepSeek V4 Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 54.3 to 31.2 on the Noometry Index. Mistral Small 3.2 costs 7.5× less per token, which makes it the better buy when DeepSeek V4 Pro's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

Which is cheaper, DeepSeek V4 Pro or Mistral Small 3.2?

Mistral Small 3.2 is cheaper. It lists at $0.0938 per million input tokens and $0.25 per million output tokens; DeepSeek V4 Pro lists at $0.66 and $1.98.

Which has the bigger context window?

DeepSeek V4 Pro does, with 1M tokens against 256K.

How many benchmarks do DeepSeek V4 Pro and Mistral Small 3.2 share?

6 benchmarks have published results for both models. DeepSeek V4 Pro has 48 scored results on Noometry and Mistral Small 3.2 has 6.

Related comparisons

Go deeper