Model comparison

DeepSeek V4 Pro vs Qwen3-4B

DeepSeek V4 Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 54.2 to 31.5 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 5 shared benchmarks.

DeepSeek V4 Pro DeepSeek

54.2

Rank #28 Confirmed

Qwen3-4B Alibaba (Qwen)

31.5

Rank #261 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 5 benchmarks with published results for both. DeepSeek V4 Pro scores higher in 4 categories and Qwen3-4B in 0 categories; 4 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in reasoning, where DeepSeek V4 Pro leads 56.4 to 18.5.
  • The biggest single-benchmark swing is OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025: 98.6% for DeepSeek V4 Pro and 52.2% for Qwen3-4B.

Side by side

DeepSeek V4 Pro and Qwen3-4B specifications
DeepSeek V4 ProQwen3-4B
ProviderDeepSeekAlibaba (Qwen)
Noometry Index54.231.5
Released2026-04-242025-04-29
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window1M—
Max output393K—
Input $ / M tokens$0.43—
Output $ / M tokens$0.87—
Results tracked486

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Not comparable

DeepSeek V4 Pro: 52.2 (#31), Qwen3-4B: —

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4 ProQwen3-4B
SWE-bench Verified77.6%—
FrontierCode28.6%—
LMArena WebDev1582—
SciCode51%—
WeirdML66.2%—
LMArena Coding1470—
ALE-Bench1,403—

Agentic & Tool Use DeepSeek V4 Pro leads

DeepSeek V4 Pro: 32.7 (#54), Qwen3-4B: 27.3 (#94)

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4 ProQwen3-4B
APEX-Agents47.3%—
Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard—35.7%
Vending-Bench 23,285—

Reasoning DeepSeek V4 Pro leads

DeepSeek V4 Pro: 56.4 (#22), Qwen3-4B: 18.5 (#264)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4 ProQwen3-4B
Chess Puzzles47%4%
ARC-AGI-261.3%—
Kagi LLM Benchmark53.5%—
NYT Connections (extended)91.3%—
ARC-AGI-190.5%—
CritPt18%—
LMArena Hard Prompts1461—
Mystery Game Puzzles43%—
DTBench93.9%—
LMCA45.5%—
Surface Evolver Bench40%—
Epoch Capabilities Index155.39—
ForecastBench56.1—

Math DeepSeek V4 Pro leads

DeepSeek V4 Pro: 64.6 (#24), Qwen3-4B: 28.5 (#228)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4 ProQwen3-4B
MathArena Final-Answer Competitions76.6%38.5%
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-202598.6%52.2%
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)64.6%—
FrontierMath Tier 426.8%—
ProofBench50%—
LMArena Math1455—

Knowledge DeepSeek V4 Pro leads

DeepSeek V4 Pro: 59.5 (#28), Qwen3-4B: 33.0 (#198)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4 ProQwen3-4B
GPQA Diamond91.7%52.3%
Vectara Hallucination Rate8.6%5.7%
SimpleQA Verified52.9%—
LMArena Expert1463—

Multilingual Not comparable

DeepSeek V4 Pro: 54.5 (#44), Qwen3-4B: —

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4 ProQwen3-4B
LMArena Non-English1438—
LMArena Chinese1486—
LMArena French1473—
LMArena German1458—
LMArena Japanese1448—
LMArena Korean1452—
LMArena Russian1452—
LMArena Spanish1457—

Instruction Following Not comparable

DeepSeek V4 Pro: 76.3 (#44), Qwen3-4B: —

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4 ProQwen3-4B
LMArena Instruction Following1448—

Long Context Not comparable

DeepSeek V4 Pro: 45.0 (#49), Qwen3-4B: —

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4 ProQwen3-4B
CL-bench Life13.5%—
LMArena Longer Query1459—

Writing & Preference Not comparable

DeepSeek V4 Pro: 65.6 (#45), Qwen3-4B: —

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4 ProQwen3-4B
LMArena Text1451—
LMArena Creative Writing1446—
EQ-Bench Creative Writing1553—
EQ-Bench 41166—
LMArena Multi-Turn1467—

Frequently asked questions

Is DeepSeek V4 Pro better than Qwen3-4B?

DeepSeek V4 Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 54.2 to 31.5 on the Noometry Index.

How many benchmarks do DeepSeek V4 Pro and Qwen3-4B share?

5 benchmarks have published results for both models. DeepSeek V4 Pro has 48 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3-4B has 6.

Related comparisons

Go deeper