Model comparison

Devstral Small 2505 vs GPT-6 Luna

GPT-6 Luna is the stronger model overall, scoring 45.1 to 33.9 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.

Devstral Small 2505 Mistral AI

33.9

Rank #228 Reported

GPT-6 Luna OpenAI

45.1

Rank #65 Confirmed

Summary

  • The widest gap is in coding, where GPT-6 Luna leads 54.7 to 38.6.
  • Devstral Small 2505 is cheaper at $0.10 / $0.30 per million input/output tokens, against $0.10 / $0.50 for GPT-6 Luna.
  • GPT-6 Luna accepts more context: 1.05M tokens versus 128K.
  • Devstral Small 2505 has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Devstral Small 2505 and GPT-6 Luna specifications
Devstral Small 2505GPT-6 Luna
ProviderMistral AIOpenAI
Noometry Index33.945.1
Released2025-05-072026-09-22
WeightsOpenProprietary
Context window128K1.05M
Max output128K128K
Input $ / M tokens$0.10$0.10
Output $ / M tokens$0.30$0.50
Results tracked418

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding GPT-6 Luna leads

Devstral Small 2505: 38.6 (#160), GPT-6 Luna: 54.7 (#24)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkDevstral Small 2505GPT-6 Luna
DeepSWE—66.6%
FrontierCode—42.4%
SWE-bench Verified (bash only)56.4%—
LMArena WebDev—1583
SciCode28.8%—
LMArena Coding—1448

Reasoning GPT-6 Luna leads

Devstral Small 2505: 19.1 (#243), GPT-6 Luna: 31.7 (#68)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkDevstral Small 2505GPT-6 Luna
Kagi LLM Benchmark37.7%—
NYT Connections (extended)—68.7%
CritPt0%—
LMArena Hard Prompts—1415

Math Not comparable

Devstral Small 2505: —, GPT-6 Luna: 35.6 (#140)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkDevstral Small 2505GPT-6 Luna
LMArena Math—1396

Knowledge Not comparable

Devstral Small 2505: —, GPT-6 Luna: 40.1 (#110)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkDevstral Small 2505GPT-6 Luna
LMArena Expert—1458

Multimodal Not comparable

Devstral Small 2505: —, GPT-6 Luna: 42.0 (#27)

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkDevstral Small 2505GPT-6 Luna
Furniture Assembly—44.2%

Multilingual Not comparable

Devstral Small 2505: —, GPT-6 Luna: 51.0 (#111)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkDevstral Small 2505GPT-6 Luna
LMArena Non-English—1390
LMArena Chinese—1425
LMArena Russian—1392
LMArena Spanish—1416

Instruction Following Not comparable

Devstral Small 2505: —, GPT-6 Luna: 74.7 (#85)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkDevstral Small 2505GPT-6 Luna
LMArena Instruction Following—1414

Long Context Not comparable

Devstral Small 2505: —, GPT-6 Luna: 43.3 (#95)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkDevstral Small 2505GPT-6 Luna
LMArena Longer Query—1417

Writing & Preference Not comparable

Devstral Small 2505: —, GPT-6 Luna: 58.4 (#115)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkDevstral Small 2505GPT-6 Luna
LMArena Text—1392
LMArena Creative Writing—1357
LMArena Multi-Turn—1400

Frequently asked questions

Is Devstral Small 2505 better than GPT-6 Luna?

GPT-6 Luna is the stronger model overall, scoring 45.1 to 33.9 on the Noometry Index.

Which is cheaper, Devstral Small 2505 or GPT-6 Luna?

Devstral Small 2505 is cheaper. It lists at $0.10 per million input tokens and $0.30 per million output tokens; GPT-6 Luna lists at $0.10 and $0.50.

Is Devstral Small 2505 or GPT-6 Luna better for coding?

GPT-6 Luna scores higher on coding benchmarks: 54.7 versus 38.6 in the Noometry coding category.

Which has the bigger context window?

GPT-6 Luna does, with 1.05M tokens against 128K.

How many benchmarks do Devstral Small 2505 and GPT-6 Luna share?

0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Devstral Small 2505 has 4 scored results on Noometry and GPT-6 Luna has 18.

Related comparisons

Go deeper