Model comparison

Devstral Small 2505 vs Qwen Plus

Qwen Plus is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.1 to 34.3 on the Noometry Index. Devstral Small 2505 costs 4.0× less per token, which makes it the better buy when Qwen Plus's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

Last verified . 1 shared benchmarks.

Devstral Small 2505 Mistral AI

34.3

Rank #233 Reported

Qwen Plus Alibaba (Qwen)

37.1

Rank #210 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 1 benchmark with published results for both. Devstral Small 2505 scores higher in 1 category and Qwen Plus in 1 category; one gap is clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in reasoning, where Qwen Plus leads 28.4 to 19.7.
  • The biggest single-benchmark swing is Kagi LLM Benchmark: 37.7% for Devstral Small 2505 and 63.3% for Qwen Plus.
  • Devstral Small 2505 is cheaper at $0.10 / $0.30 per million input/output tokens, against $0.40 / $1.20 for Qwen Plus.
  • Qwen Plus accepts more context: 1M tokens versus 128K.
  • Devstral Small 2505 has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Devstral Small 2505 and Qwen Plus specifications
Devstral Small 2505Qwen Plus
ProviderMistral AIAlibaba (Qwen)
Noometry Index34.337.1
Released2025-05-072024-01-25
WeightsOpenProprietary
Context window128K1M
Max output128K33K
Input $ / M tokens$0.10$0.40
Output $ / M tokens$0.30$1.20
Results tracked420

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Too close to call

Devstral Small 2505: 38.9 (#166), Qwen Plus: 38.9 (#167)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkDevstral Small 2505Qwen Plus
SWE-bench Verified (bash only)56.4%—
SciCode28.8%—
LMArena Coding—1328

Reasoning Qwen Plus leads

Devstral Small 2505: 19.7 (#252), Qwen Plus: 28.4 (#107)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkDevstral Small 2505Qwen Plus
Kagi LLM Benchmark37.7%63.3%
CritPt0%—
LMArena Hard Prompts—1317
DTBench—81.1%
LMCA—24%

Math Not comparable

Devstral Small 2505: —, Qwen Plus: 23.3 (#271)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkDevstral Small 2505Qwen Plus
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025—17.8%
LMArena Math—1326
MATH Level 5—65.3%
FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set)—1.7%

Knowledge Not comparable

Devstral Small 2505: —, Qwen Plus: 27.4 (#251)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkDevstral Small 2505Qwen Plus
GPQA Diamond—48.1%
LMArena Expert—1328

Multilingual Not comparable

Devstral Small 2505: —, Qwen Plus: 45.1 (#175)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkDevstral Small 2505Qwen Plus
LMArena Non-English—1310
LMArena Chinese—1347
LMArena Japanese—1251
LMArena Russian—1323

Instruction Following Not comparable

Devstral Small 2505: —, Qwen Plus: 68.8 (#181)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkDevstral Small 2505Qwen Plus
LMArena Instruction Following—1303

Long Context Not comparable

Devstral Small 2505: —, Qwen Plus: 40.3 (#158)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkDevstral Small 2505Qwen Plus
LMArena Longer Query—1324

Writing & Preference Not comparable

Devstral Small 2505: —, Qwen Plus: 52.2 (#176)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkDevstral Small 2505Qwen Plus
LMArena Text—1326
LMArena Creative Writing—1293
LMArena Multi-Turn—1336

Frequently asked questions

Is Devstral Small 2505 better than Qwen Plus?

Qwen Plus is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.1 to 34.3 on the Noometry Index. Devstral Small 2505 costs 4.0× less per token, which makes it the better buy when Qwen Plus's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

Which is cheaper, Devstral Small 2505 or Qwen Plus?

Devstral Small 2505 is cheaper. It lists at $0.10 per million input tokens and $0.30 per million output tokens; Qwen Plus lists at $0.40 and $1.20.

Is Devstral Small 2505 or Qwen Plus better for coding?

They score almost the same on coding (38.9 vs 38.9); test both on your own repository before choosing.

Which has the bigger context window?

Qwen Plus does, with 1M tokens against 128K.

How many benchmarks do Devstral Small 2505 and Qwen Plus share?

1 benchmark has published results for both models. Devstral Small 2505 has 4 scored results on Noometry and Qwen Plus has 20.

Related comparisons

Go deeper