Model comparison
Devstral Small 2505 vs Qwen2.5 32B Instruct
Devstral Small 2505 is the stronger model overall, scoring 34.3 to 30.1 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
Summary
- Devstral Small 2505 is cheaper at $0.10 / $0.30 per million input/output tokens, against $0.70 / $2.80 for Qwen2.5 32B Instruct.
- Qwen2.5 32B Instruct accepts more context: 131K tokens versus 128K.
Side by side
| Devstral Small 2505 | Qwen2.5 32B Instruct | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Mistral AI | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 34.3 | 30.1 |
| Released | 2025-05-07 | 2024-09 |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | 128K | 131K |
| Max output | 128K | 8K |
| Input $ / M tokens | $0.10 | $0.70 |
| Output $ / M tokens | $0.30 | $2.80 |
| Results tracked | 4 | 7 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Too close to call
Devstral Small 2505: 38.9 (#166), Qwen2.5 32B Instruct: 38.7 (#169)
| Benchmark | Devstral Small 2505 | Qwen2.5 32B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| SWE-bench Verified (bash only) | 56.4% | — |
| SciCode | 28.8% | — |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | — | 45% |
| BigCodeBench Complete | — | 52.3% |
Reasoning Too close to call
Devstral Small 2505: 19.7 (#252), Qwen2.5 32B Instruct: 19.2 (#266)
| Benchmark | Devstral Small 2505 | Qwen2.5 32B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 37.7% | — |
| CritPt | 0% | — |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 0% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 128.52 |
Math Not comparable
Devstral Small 2505: —, Qwen2.5 32B Instruct: 16.2 (#296)
| Benchmark | Devstral Small 2505 | Qwen2.5 32B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 7.4% |
| MATH Level 5 | — | 56.1% |
Knowledge Not comparable
Devstral Small 2505: —, Qwen2.5 32B Instruct: 24.9 (#266)
| Benchmark | Devstral Small 2505 | Qwen2.5 32B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | — | 46.1% |
Frequently asked questions
Is Devstral Small 2505 better than Qwen2.5 32B Instruct?
Devstral Small 2505 is the stronger model overall, scoring 34.3 to 30.1 on the Noometry Index.
Which is cheaper, Devstral Small 2505 or Qwen2.5 32B Instruct?
Devstral Small 2505 is cheaper. It lists at $0.10 per million input tokens and $0.30 per million output tokens; Qwen2.5 32B Instruct lists at $0.70 and $2.80.
Is Devstral Small 2505 or Qwen2.5 32B Instruct better for coding?
They score almost the same on coding (38.9 vs 38.7); test both on your own repository before choosing.
Which has the bigger context window?
Qwen2.5 32B Instruct does, with 131K tokens against 128K.
How many benchmarks do Devstral Small 2505 and Qwen2.5 32B Instruct share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Devstral Small 2505 has 4 scored results on Noometry and Qwen2.5 32B Instruct has 7.