Model comparison
Devstral Small 2505 vs Qwen3-1.7B
Devstral Small 2505 is the stronger model overall, scoring 34.3 to 26.6 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
Mistral AI
Alibaba (Qwen)Side by side
| Devstral Small 2505 | Qwen3-1.7B | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Mistral AI | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 34.3 | 26.6 |
| Released | 2025-05-07 | 2025-04-29 |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | 128K | — |
| Max output | 128K | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | $0.10 | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | $0.30 | — |
| Results tracked | 4 | 4 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Not comparable
Devstral Small 2505: 38.9 (#166), Qwen3-1.7B: —
| Benchmark | Devstral Small 2505 | Qwen3-1.7B |
|---|---|---|
| SWE-bench Verified (bash only) | 56.4% | — |
| SciCode | 28.8% | — |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Devstral Small 2505: —, Qwen3-1.7B: 24.7 (#115)
| Benchmark | Devstral Small 2505 | Qwen3-1.7B |
|---|---|---|
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | — | 28.4% |
Reasoning Too close to call
Devstral Small 2505: 19.7 (#252), Qwen3-1.7B: 19.2 (#267)
| Benchmark | Devstral Small 2505 | Qwen3-1.7B |
|---|---|---|
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 37.7% | — |
| CritPt | 0% | — |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 0% |
Math Not comparable
Devstral Small 2505: —, Qwen3-1.7B: 16.3 (#294)
| Benchmark | Devstral Small 2505 | Qwen3-1.7B |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 8.1% |
Knowledge Not comparable
Devstral Small 2505: —, Qwen3-1.7B: 19.6 (#278)
| Benchmark | Devstral Small 2505 | Qwen3-1.7B |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | — | 38% |
Frequently asked questions
Is Devstral Small 2505 better than Qwen3-1.7B?
Devstral Small 2505 is the stronger model overall, scoring 34.3 to 26.6 on the Noometry Index.
How many benchmarks do Devstral Small 2505 and Qwen3-1.7B share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Devstral Small 2505 has 4 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3-1.7B has 4.