Model comparison

Devstral Small 2505 vs Step 3.5 Flash

Step 3.5 Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.3 to 34.3 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.

Devstral Small 2505 Mistral AI

34.3

Rank #233 Reported

Step 3.5 Flash StepFun

42.3

Rank #116 Confirmed

Summary

  • The widest gap is in coding, where Step 3.5 Flash leads 42.4 to 38.9.
  • Both cost about the same: $0.10 input and $0.30 output per million tokens.
  • Step 3.5 Flash accepts more context: 256K tokens versus 128K.

Side by side

Devstral Small 2505 and Step 3.5 Flash specifications
Devstral Small 2505Step 3.5 Flash
ProviderMistral AIStepFun
Noometry Index34.342.3
Released2025-05-072026-01-29
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window128K256K
Max output128K256K
Input $ / M tokens$0.10$0.10
Output $ / M tokens$0.30$0.30
Results tracked419

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Step 3.5 Flash leads

Devstral Small 2505: 38.9 (#166), Step 3.5 Flash: 42.4 (#105)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkDevstral Small 2505Step 3.5 Flash
SWE-bench Verified (bash only)56.4%—
SciCode28.8%—
LMArena Coding—1436

Reasoning Step 3.5 Flash leads

Devstral Small 2505: 19.7 (#252), Step 3.5 Flash: 22.2 (#202)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkDevstral Small 2505Step 3.5 Flash
Kagi LLM Benchmark37.7%—
NYT Connections (extended)—28.4%
CritPt0%—
LMArena Hard Prompts—1411

Math Not comparable

Devstral Small 2505: —, Step 3.5 Flash: 42.6 (#84)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkDevstral Small 2505Step 3.5 Flash
MathArena Final-Answer Competitions—66.8%
LMArena Math—1408

Knowledge Not comparable

Devstral Small 2505: —, Step 3.5 Flash: 39.6 (#132)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkDevstral Small 2505Step 3.5 Flash
LMArena Expert—1421

Multilingual Not comparable

Devstral Small 2505: —, Step 3.5 Flash: 50.5 (#119)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkDevstral Small 2505Step 3.5 Flash
LMArena Non-English—1385
LMArena Chinese—1447
LMArena French—1421
LMArena German—1405
LMArena Japanese—1354
LMArena Korean—1352
LMArena Russian—1385
LMArena Spanish—1419

Instruction Following Not comparable

Devstral Small 2505: —, Step 3.5 Flash: 73.1 (#124)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkDevstral Small 2505Step 3.5 Flash
LMArena Instruction Following—1385

Long Context Not comparable

Devstral Small 2505: —, Step 3.5 Flash: 42.8 (#117)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkDevstral Small 2505Step 3.5 Flash
LMArena Longer Query—1402

Writing & Preference Not comparable

Devstral Small 2505: —, Step 3.5 Flash: 58.8 (#113)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkDevstral Small 2505Step 3.5 Flash
LMArena Text—1403
LMArena Creative Writing—1357
LMArena Multi-Turn—1405

Frequently asked questions

Is Devstral Small 2505 better than Step 3.5 Flash?

Step 3.5 Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.3 to 34.3 on the Noometry Index.

Which is cheaper, Devstral Small 2505 or Step 3.5 Flash?

Step 3.5 Flash is cheaper. It lists at $0.10 per million input tokens and $0.30 per million output tokens; Devstral Small 2505 lists at $0.10 and $0.30.

Is Devstral Small 2505 or Step 3.5 Flash better for coding?

Step 3.5 Flash scores higher on coding benchmarks: 42.4 versus 38.9 in the Noometry coding category.

Which has the bigger context window?

Step 3.5 Flash does, with 256K tokens against 128K.

How many benchmarks do Devstral Small 2505 and Step 3.5 Flash share?

0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Devstral Small 2505 has 4 scored results on Noometry and Step 3.5 Flash has 19.

Related comparisons

Go deeper