Model comparison
Seed 2.0 Pro vs MiMo-V2-Flash
Seed 2.0 Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.5 to 40.8 on the Noometry Index. MiMo-V2-Flash costs 6.4× less per token, which makes it the better buy when Seed 2.0 Pro's lead doesn't matter for your workload.
Last verified . 17 shared benchmarks.
ByteDance SeedSummary
- They share 17 benchmarks with published results for both. Seed 2.0 Pro scores higher in 7 categories and MiMo-V2-Flash in 1 category; 4 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in coding, where Seed 2.0 Pro leads 42.9 to 35.8.
- MiMo-V2-Flash is cheaper at $0.14 / $0.28 per million input/output tokens, against $0.50 / $3 for Seed 2.0 Pro.
- MiMo-V2-Flash accepts more context: 262K tokens versus 256K.
- MiMo-V2-Flash has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Seed 2.0 Pro | MiMo-V2-Flash | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | ByteDance Seed | Xiaomi |
| Noometry Index | 42.5 | 40.8 |
| Released | 2026-02-14 | 2025-12-16 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | 256K | 262K |
| Max output | 128K | 66K |
| Input $ / M tokens | $0.50 | $0.14 |
| Output $ / M tokens | $3 | $0.28 |
| Results tracked | 20 | 21 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Seed 2.0 Pro leads
Seed 2.0 Pro: 42.9 (#84), MiMo-V2-Flash: 35.8 (#205)
| Benchmark | Seed 2.0 Pro | MiMo-V2-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1472 | 1443 |
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1330 |
| SciCode | — | 25.9% |
| ALE-Bench | — | 737.95 |
Reasoning Too close to call
Seed 2.0 Pro: 23.1 (#167), MiMo-V2-Flash: 24.1 (#155)
| Benchmark | Seed 2.0 Pro | MiMo-V2-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1453 | 1420 |
| NYT Connections (extended) | 28.4% | — |
| CritPt | — | 0% |
| Thematic Generalization | 57.1% | — |
Math Too close to call
Seed 2.0 Pro: 36.5 (#110), MiMo-V2-Flash: 35.6 (#141)
| Benchmark | Seed 2.0 Pro | MiMo-V2-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1440 | 1396 |
Knowledge Too close to call
Seed 2.0 Pro: 39.6 (#119), MiMo-V2-Flash: 39.1 (#126)
| Benchmark | Seed 2.0 Pro | MiMo-V2-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1440 | 1425 |
Multimodal Not comparable
Seed 2.0 Pro: 40.8 (#34), MiMo-V2-Flash: —
| Benchmark | Seed 2.0 Pro | MiMo-V2-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1275 | — |
Multilingual Seed 2.0 Pro leads
Seed 2.0 Pro: 54.8 (#37), MiMo-V2-Flash: 51.1 (#109)
| Benchmark | Seed 2.0 Pro | MiMo-V2-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1442 | 1391 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1490 | 1463 |
| LMArena French | 1470 | 1429 |
| LMArena German | 1443 | 1395 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1408 | 1324 |
| LMArena Korean | 1412 | 1358 |
| LMArena Russian | 1450 | 1387 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1460 | 1420 |
Instruction Following Seed 2.0 Pro leads
Seed 2.0 Pro: 74.7 (#86), MiMo-V2-Flash: 73.7 (#115)
| Benchmark | Seed 2.0 Pro | MiMo-V2-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1414 | 1392 |
Long Context Too close to call
Seed 2.0 Pro: 43.6 (#85), MiMo-V2-Flash: 43.0 (#106)
| Benchmark | Seed 2.0 Pro | MiMo-V2-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1428 | 1409 |
Writing & Preference Seed 2.0 Pro leads
Seed 2.0 Pro: 63.0 (#66), MiMo-V2-Flash: 59.9 (#101)
| Benchmark | Seed 2.0 Pro | MiMo-V2-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1448 | 1411 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1406 | 1375 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1441 | 1404 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Seed 2.0 Pro better than MiMo-V2-Flash?
Seed 2.0 Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.5 to 40.8 on the Noometry Index. MiMo-V2-Flash costs 6.4× less per token, which makes it the better buy when Seed 2.0 Pro's lead doesn't matter for your workload.
Which is cheaper, Seed 2.0 Pro or MiMo-V2-Flash?
MiMo-V2-Flash is cheaper. It lists at $0.14 per million input tokens and $0.28 per million output tokens; Seed 2.0 Pro lists at $0.50 and $3.
Is Seed 2.0 Pro or MiMo-V2-Flash better for coding?
Seed 2.0 Pro scores higher on coding benchmarks: 42.9 versus 35.8 in the Noometry coding category.
Which has the bigger context window?
MiMo-V2-Flash does, with 262K tokens against 256K.
How many benchmarks do Seed 2.0 Pro and MiMo-V2-Flash share?
17 benchmarks have published results for both models. Seed 2.0 Pro has 20 scored results on Noometry and MiMo-V2-Flash has 21.