Model comparison
Dolly 2.0-12b vs Gemma 2 2b IT
Gemma 2 2b IT is the stronger model overall, scoring 33.1 to 25.5 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 9 shared benchmarks.
Databricks
GoogleSummary
- They share 9 benchmarks with published results for both. Dolly 2.0-12b scores higher in 0 categories and Gemma 2 2b IT in 6 categories; 6 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Gemma 2 2b IT leads 36.5 to 15.2.
Side by side
| Dolly 2.0-12b | Gemma 2 2b IT | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Databricks | |
| Noometry Index | 25.5 | 33.1 |
| Released | 2023-04-11 | — |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 17 | 17 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Gemma 2 2b IT leads
Dolly 2.0-12b: 23.4 (#332), Gemma 2 2b IT: 32.3 (#273)
| Benchmark | Dolly 2.0-12b | Gemma 2 2b IT |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 776 | 1112 |
Reasoning Gemma 2 2b IT leads
Dolly 2.0-12b: 15.3 (#316), Gemma 2 2b IT: 21.4 (#224)
| Benchmark | Dolly 2.0-12b | Gemma 2 2b IT |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 804 | 1113 |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 89.67 | — |
| HellaSwag | 70.8% | — |
| PIQA | 75.4% | — |
| WinoGrande | 61.8% | — |
Math Gemma 2 2b IT leads
Dolly 2.0-12b: 27.3 (#251), Gemma 2 2b IT: 32.6 (#212)
| Benchmark | Dolly 2.0-12b | Gemma 2 2b IT |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 871 | 1135 |
Knowledge Not comparable
Dolly 2.0-12b: —, Gemma 2 2b IT: 29.9 (#231)
| Benchmark | Dolly 2.0-12b | Gemma 2 2b IT |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | — | 1096 |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | 39.6% | — |
| BoolQ | 56.3% | — |
| MMLU | 26.2% | — |
| OpenBookQA | 39.2% | — |
Multilingual Gemma 2 2b IT leads
Dolly 2.0-12b: 17.4 (#296), Gemma 2 2b IT: 32.3 (#257)
| Benchmark | Dolly 2.0-12b | Gemma 2 2b IT |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 836 | 1121 |
| LMArena Chinese | 836 | 1132 |
| LMArena French | — | 1157 |
| LMArena German | — | 1114 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1083 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1055 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1118 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1140 |
Instruction Following Gemma 2 2b IT leads
Dolly 2.0-12b: 38.7 (#304), Gemma 2 2b IT: 57.8 (#263)
| Benchmark | Dolly 2.0-12b | Gemma 2 2b IT |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 814 | 1118 |
Long Context Not comparable
Dolly 2.0-12b: —, Gemma 2 2b IT: 34.3 (#250)
| Benchmark | Dolly 2.0-12b | Gemma 2 2b IT |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1130 |
Writing & Preference Gemma 2 2b IT leads
Dolly 2.0-12b: 15.2 (#311), Gemma 2 2b IT: 36.5 (#263)
| Benchmark | Dolly 2.0-12b | Gemma 2 2b IT |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 851 | 1156 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 864 | 1147 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 740 | 1118 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Dolly 2.0-12b better than Gemma 2 2b IT?
Gemma 2 2b IT is the stronger model overall, scoring 33.1 to 25.5 on the Noometry Index.
Is Dolly 2.0-12b or Gemma 2 2b IT better for coding?
Gemma 2 2b IT scores higher on coding benchmarks: 32.3 versus 23.4 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Dolly 2.0-12b and Gemma 2 2b IT share?
9 benchmarks have published results for both models. Dolly 2.0-12b has 17 scored results on Noometry and Gemma 2 2b IT has 17.