Model comparison
Dolly 2.0-12b vs Gemma 2 9B
Dolly 2.0-12b and Gemma 2 9B score almost the same on the Noometry Index (25.5 vs 25.9), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.
Last verified . 13 shared benchmarks.
Databricks
GoogleSummary
- They share 13 benchmarks with published results for both. Dolly 2.0-12b scores higher in 1 category and Gemma 2 9B in 5 categories; 5 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in multilingual, where Gemma 2 9B leads 36.6 to 17.4.
Side by side
| Dolly 2.0-12b | Gemma 2 9B | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Databricks | |
| Noometry Index | 25.5 | 25.9 |
| Released | 2023-04-11 | 2024-06-24 |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 17 | 35 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Gemma 2 9B leads
Dolly 2.0-12b: 23.4 (#332), Gemma 2 9B: 29.4 (#304)
| Benchmark | Dolly 2.0-12b | Gemma 2 9B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 776 | 1173 |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | — | 34.7% |
| LiveBench Coding | — | 22.5% |
| BigCodeBench Complete | — | 40.6% |
Reasoning Too close to call
Dolly 2.0-12b: 15.3 (#316), Gemma 2 9B: 15.9 (#309)
| Benchmark | Dolly 2.0-12b | Gemma 2 9B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 804 | 1171 |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 89.67 | 119.83 |
| PIQA | 75.4% | 83.7% |
| LiveBench Reasoning | — | 15.2% |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | — | 36.4% |
| HellaSwag | 70.8% | — |
| LiveBench | — | 28.7% |
| WinoGrande | 61.8% | — |
Math Dolly 2.0-12b leads
Dolly 2.0-12b: 27.3 (#251), Gemma 2 9B: 9.9 (#318)
| Benchmark | Dolly 2.0-12b | Gemma 2 9B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 871 | 1183 |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 0.6% |
| LiveBench Math | — | 19.8% |
| MATH Level 5 | — | 21% |
| GSM8K | — | 84.9% |
Knowledge Not comparable
Dolly 2.0-12b: —, Gemma 2 9B: 9.7 (#305)
| Benchmark | Dolly 2.0-12b | Gemma 2 9B |
|---|---|---|
| BoolQ | 56.3% | 85.7% |
| MMLU | 26.2% | 72.1% |
| GPQA Diamond | — | 27.5% |
| LMArena Expert | — | 1147 |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | 39.6% | — |
| OpenBookQA | 39.2% | — |
Multilingual Gemma 2 9B leads
Dolly 2.0-12b: 17.4 (#296), Gemma 2 9B: 36.6 (#238)
| Benchmark | Dolly 2.0-12b | Gemma 2 9B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 836 | 1188 |
| LMArena Chinese | 836 | 1185 |
| LMArena French | — | 1190 |
| LMArena German | — | 1186 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1144 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1137 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1200 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1200 |
Instruction Following Gemma 2 9B leads
Dolly 2.0-12b: 38.7 (#304), Gemma 2 9B: 57.6 (#269)
| Benchmark | Dolly 2.0-12b | Gemma 2 9B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 814 | 1178 |
| LiveBench Instruction Following | — | 52.6% |
Long Context Not comparable
Dolly 2.0-12b: —, Gemma 2 9B: 36.3 (#233)
| Benchmark | Dolly 2.0-12b | Gemma 2 9B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1197 |
Writing & Preference Gemma 2 9B leads
Dolly 2.0-12b: 15.2 (#311), Gemma 2 9B: 32.1 (#281)
| Benchmark | Dolly 2.0-12b | Gemma 2 9B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 851 | 1207 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 864 | 1206 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 740 | 1193 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | — | 841 |
| LiveBench Language | — | 25.5% |
Frequently asked questions
Is Dolly 2.0-12b better than Gemma 2 9B?
Dolly 2.0-12b and Gemma 2 9B score almost the same on the Noometry Index (25.5 vs 25.9), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.
Is Dolly 2.0-12b or Gemma 2 9B better for coding?
Gemma 2 9B scores higher on coding benchmarks: 29.4 versus 23.4 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Dolly 2.0-12b and Gemma 2 9B share?
13 benchmarks have published results for both models. Dolly 2.0-12b has 17 scored results on Noometry and Gemma 2 9B has 35.