Model comparison

Dolly 2.0-12b vs Kimi K3

Kimi K3 is the stronger model overall, scoring 59.5 to 25.5 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 10 shared benchmarks.

Dolly 2.0-12b Databricks

25.5

Rank #342 Confirmed

Kimi K3 Moonshot AI

59.5

Rank #15 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 10 benchmarks with published results for both. Dolly 2.0-12b scores higher in 0 categories and Kimi K3 in 6 categories; 6 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Kimi K3 leads 76.6 to 15.2.

Side by side

Dolly 2.0-12b and Kimi K3 specifications
Dolly 2.0-12bKimi K3
ProviderDatabricksMoonshot AI
Noometry Index25.559.5
Released2023-04-112026-07-16
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window—1.05M
Max output—1.05M
Input $ / M tokens—$3
Output $ / M tokens—$15
Results tracked1753

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Kimi K3 leads

Dolly 2.0-12b: 23.4 (#332), Kimi K3: 61.0 (#10)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkDolly 2.0-12bKimi K3
LMArena Coding7761508
DeepSWE—68.5%
FrontierCode—44.2%
LMArena WebDev—1654
FrontierSWE—25.9%
SciCode—59.5%
WeirdML—82.6%
ALE-Bench—1,524

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Dolly 2.0-12b: —, Kimi K3: 41.8 (#20)

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkDolly 2.0-12bKimi K3
APEX-Agents—50.6%
τ²-bench Banking—37.1%
PostTrainBench—32%
GBAEval—48.3%
GDP.pdf—19%
Vending-Bench 2—5,165

Reasoning Kimi K3 leads

Dolly 2.0-12b: 15.3 (#316), Kimi K3: 63.0 (#17)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkDolly 2.0-12bKimi K3
LMArena Hard Prompts8041496
Epoch Capabilities Index89.67157.45
ARC-AGI-2—60.4%
SimpleBench—60.7%
NYT Connections (extended)—93.6%
ARC-AGI-1—94.5%
CritPt—23.4%
Chess Puzzles—39%
Mystery Game Puzzles—26%
DTBench—91.2%
LMCA—52.7%
Surface Evolver Bench—95%
ForecastBench—61.1
HellaSwag70.8%—
PIQA75.4%—
WinoGrande61.8%—

Math Kimi K3 leads

Dolly 2.0-12b: 27.3 (#251), Kimi K3: 74.2 (#16)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkDolly 2.0-12bKimi K3
LMArena Math8711491
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)—72.2%
FrontierMath Tier 4—39%
MathArena Final-Answer Competitions—87.8%
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025—97.2%
ProofBench—87%

Knowledge Not comparable

Dolly 2.0-12b: —, Kimi K3: 63.2 (#21)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkDolly 2.0-12bKimi K3
GPQA Diamond—93.1%
SimpleQA Verified—50.6%
LMArena Expert—1521
ARC (AI2) Challenge39.6%—
BoolQ56.3%—
MMLU26.2%—
OpenBookQA39.2%—

Multimodal Not comparable

Dolly 2.0-12b: —, Kimi K3: 37.8 (#70)

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkDolly 2.0-12bKimi K3
Blueprint-Bench 2—29.5%
Furniture Assembly—34.2%

Multilingual Kimi K3 leads

Dolly 2.0-12b: 17.4 (#296), Kimi K3: 56.3 (#21)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkDolly 2.0-12bKimi K3
LMArena Non-English8361466
LMArena Chinese8361529
LMArena French—1491
LMArena German—1488
LMArena Japanese—1487
LMArena Korean—1458
LMArena Russian—1482
LMArena Spanish—1472

Instruction Following Kimi K3 leads

Dolly 2.0-12b: 38.7 (#304), Kimi K3: 77.7 (#14)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkDolly 2.0-12bKimi K3
LMArena Instruction Following8141483

Long Context Not comparable

Dolly 2.0-12b: —, Kimi K3: 45.8 (#29)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkDolly 2.0-12bKimi K3
LMArena Longer Query—1494

Writing & Preference Kimi K3 leads

Dolly 2.0-12b: 15.2 (#311), Kimi K3: 76.6 (#4)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkDolly 2.0-12bKimi K3
LMArena Text8511476
LMArena Creative Writing8641454
LMArena Multi-Turn7401488
EQ-Bench Creative Writing—2082
EQ-Bench 4—1339

Frequently asked questions

Is Dolly 2.0-12b better than Kimi K3?

Kimi K3 is the stronger model overall, scoring 59.5 to 25.5 on the Noometry Index.

Is Dolly 2.0-12b or Kimi K3 better for coding?

Kimi K3 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 61.0 versus 23.4 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Dolly 2.0-12b and Kimi K3 share?

10 benchmarks have published results for both models. Dolly 2.0-12b has 17 scored results on Noometry and Kimi K3 has 53.

Related comparisons

Go deeper