Model comparison
Dolly 2.0-12b vs Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct
Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct is the stronger model overall, scoring 29.3 to 25.5 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 14 shared benchmarks.
Databricks
MicrosoftSummary
- They share 14 benchmarks with published results for both. Dolly 2.0-12b scores higher in 1 category and Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct in 5 categories; 4 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct leads 31.1 to 15.2.
Side by side
| Dolly 2.0-12b | Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Databricks | Microsoft |
| Noometry Index | 25.5 | 29.3 |
| Released | 2023-04-11 | 2024-04-23 |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 17 | 32 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct leads
Dolly 2.0-12b: 23.4 (#332), Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct: 27.9 (#318)
| Benchmark | Dolly 2.0-12b | Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 776 | 1101 |
| LiveBench Coding | — | 20.3% |
Reasoning Too close to call
Dolly 2.0-12b: 15.3 (#316), Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct: 14.8 (#323)
| Benchmark | Dolly 2.0-12b | Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 804 | 1100 |
| HellaSwag | 70.8% | 77% |
| WinoGrande | 61.8% | 81.5% |
| LiveBench Reasoning | — | 15.9% |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | — | 30.3% |
| Adversarial NLI | — | 58.1% |
| BIG-Bench Hard | — | 79.1% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 89.67 | — |
| LiveBench | — | 24% |
| PIQA | 75.4% | — |
Math Too close to call
Dolly 2.0-12b: 27.3 (#251), Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct: 27.6 (#248)
| Benchmark | Dolly 2.0-12b | Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 871 | 1151 |
| LiveBench Math | — | 17.6% |
Knowledge Not comparable
Dolly 2.0-12b: —, Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct: 29.1 (#240)
| Benchmark | Dolly 2.0-12b | Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | 39.6% | 90.7% |
| MMLU | 26.2% | 75.7% |
| OpenBookQA | 39.2% | 88% |
| LMArena Expert | — | 1067 |
| BoolQ | 56.3% | — |
| TriviaQA | — | 58.1% |
Multilingual Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct leads
Dolly 2.0-12b: 17.4 (#296), Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct: 28.5 (#272)
| Benchmark | Dolly 2.0-12b | Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 836 | 1058 |
| LMArena Chinese | 836 | 1061 |
| LMArena French | — | 1135 |
| LMArena German | — | 1080 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 966 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 894 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1111 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1111 |
Instruction Following Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct leads
Dolly 2.0-12b: 38.7 (#304), Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct: 51.9 (#292)
| Benchmark | Dolly 2.0-12b | Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 814 | 1087 |
| LiveBench Instruction Following | — | 47.2% |
Long Context Not comparable
Dolly 2.0-12b: —, Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct: 33.0 (#267)
| Benchmark | Dolly 2.0-12b | Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1088 |
Writing & Preference Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct leads
Dolly 2.0-12b: 15.2 (#311), Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct: 31.1 (#284)
| Benchmark | Dolly 2.0-12b | Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 851 | 1110 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 864 | 1083 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 740 | 1068 |
| LiveBench Language | — | 12.9% |
Frequently asked questions
Is Dolly 2.0-12b better than Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct?
Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct is the stronger model overall, scoring 29.3 to 25.5 on the Noometry Index.
Is Dolly 2.0-12b or Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct better for coding?
Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct scores higher on coding benchmarks: 27.9 versus 23.4 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Dolly 2.0-12b and Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct share?
14 benchmarks have published results for both models. Dolly 2.0-12b has 17 scored results on Noometry and Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct has 32.