Model comparison
Dolly 2.0-12b vs Qwen2.5-Coder-32B
Qwen2.5-Coder-32B is the stronger model overall, scoring 33.4 to 25.5 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 14 shared benchmarks.
Databricks
Alibaba (Qwen)Summary
- They share 14 benchmarks with published results for both. Dolly 2.0-12b scores higher in 1 category and Qwen2.5-Coder-32B in 5 categories; 5 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Qwen2.5-Coder-32B leads 41.6 to 15.2.
Side by side
| Dolly 2.0-12b | Qwen2.5-Coder-32B | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Databricks | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 25.5 | 33.4 |
| Released | 2023-04-11 | 2024-09-18 |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | — | 33K |
| Max output | — | 29K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $0.66 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $1 |
| Results tracked | 17 | 31 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Too close to call
Dolly 2.0-12b: 23.4 (#332), Qwen2.5-Coder-32B: 22.6 (#333)
| Benchmark | Dolly 2.0-12b | Qwen2.5-Coder-32B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 776 | 1276 |
| SWE-bench Verified (bash only) | — | 9% |
| Aider Polyglot | — | 16.4% |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | — | 49% |
| LiveBench Coding | — | 56.9% |
| BigCodeBench Complete | — | 58% |
| HumanEval+ | — | 87.2% |
| MBPP+ | — | 77% |
Reasoning Qwen2.5-Coder-32B leads
Dolly 2.0-12b: 15.3 (#316), Qwen2.5-Coder-32B: 21.2 (#225)
| Benchmark | Dolly 2.0-12b | Qwen2.5-Coder-32B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 804 | 1251 |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 89.67 | 119.49 |
| HellaSwag | 70.8% | 83% |
| WinoGrande | 61.8% | 80.8% |
| LiveBench Reasoning | — | 42.1% |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | — | 49.9% |
| LiveBench | — | 46.2% |
| PIQA | 75.4% | — |
Math Qwen2.5-Coder-32B leads
Dolly 2.0-12b: 27.3 (#251), Qwen2.5-Coder-32B: 33.3 (#204)
| Benchmark | Dolly 2.0-12b | Qwen2.5-Coder-32B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 871 | 1251 |
| LiveBench Math | — | 46.6% |
| GSM8K | — | 93% |
Knowledge Not comparable
Dolly 2.0-12b: —, Qwen2.5-Coder-32B: 33.4 (#203)
| Benchmark | Dolly 2.0-12b | Qwen2.5-Coder-32B |
|---|---|---|
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | 39.6% | 70.5% |
| MMLU | 26.2% | 79.1% |
| LMArena Expert | — | 1221 |
| BoolQ | 56.3% | — |
| OpenBookQA | 39.2% | — |
Multilingual Qwen2.5-Coder-32B leads
Dolly 2.0-12b: 17.4 (#296), Qwen2.5-Coder-32B: 37.8 (#235)
| Benchmark | Dolly 2.0-12b | Qwen2.5-Coder-32B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 836 | 1205 |
| LMArena Chinese | 836 | 1222 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1228 |
Instruction Following Qwen2.5-Coder-32B leads
Dolly 2.0-12b: 38.7 (#304), Qwen2.5-Coder-32B: 61.4 (#245)
| Benchmark | Dolly 2.0-12b | Qwen2.5-Coder-32B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 814 | 1223 |
| LiveBench Instruction Following | — | 58.7% |
Long Context Not comparable
Dolly 2.0-12b: —, Qwen2.5-Coder-32B: 38.0 (#208)
| Benchmark | Dolly 2.0-12b | Qwen2.5-Coder-32B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1251 |
Writing & Preference Qwen2.5-Coder-32B leads
Dolly 2.0-12b: 15.2 (#311), Qwen2.5-Coder-32B: 41.6 (#240)
| Benchmark | Dolly 2.0-12b | Qwen2.5-Coder-32B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 851 | 1230 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 864 | 1174 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 740 | 1222 |
| LiveBench Language | — | 23.3% |
Frequently asked questions
Is Dolly 2.0-12b better than Qwen2.5-Coder-32B?
Qwen2.5-Coder-32B is the stronger model overall, scoring 33.4 to 25.5 on the Noometry Index.
Is Dolly 2.0-12b or Qwen2.5-Coder-32B better for coding?
They score almost the same on coding (23.4 vs 22.6); test both on your own repository before choosing.
How many benchmarks do Dolly 2.0-12b and Qwen2.5-Coder-32B share?
14 benchmarks have published results for both models. Dolly 2.0-12b has 17 scored results on Noometry and Qwen2.5-Coder-32B has 31.