Model comparison
ERNIE 5.0 0110 vs Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite
ERNIE 5.0 0110 is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.2 to 37.3 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 18 shared benchmarks.
Summary
- They share 18 benchmarks with published results for both. ERNIE 5.0 0110 scores higher in 8 categories and Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite in 1 category; 9 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where ERNIE 5.0 0110 leads 63.4 to 51.9.
Side by side
| ERNIE 5.0 0110 | Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Baidu | |
| Noometry Index | 41.2 | 37.3 |
| Released | — | 2025-02-05 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 20 | 32 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding ERNIE 5.0 0110 leads
ERNIE 5.0 0110: 42.3 (#94), Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite: 37.4 (#181)
| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.0 0110 | Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1455 | 1322 |
| LiveBench Coding | — | 47.1% |
Reasoning Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite leads
ERNIE 5.0 0110: 16.3 (#296), Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite: 21.2 (#203)
| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.0 0110 | Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1446 | 1324 |
| NYT Connections (extended) | 10.3% | — |
| Thematic Generalization | 41.7% | — |
| LiveBench Reasoning | — | 50.1% |
| DTBench | — | 52.5% |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | — | 65.5% |
| ForecastBench | — | 57.1 |
| LiveBench | — | 54.3% |
Math ERNIE 5.0 0110 leads
ERNIE 5.0 0110: 36.5 (#111), Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite: 31.8 (#192)
| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.0 0110 | Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1437 | 1309 |
| Omni-MATH | — | 37.4% |
| LiveBench Math | — | 58.1% |
Knowledge ERNIE 5.0 0110 leads
ERNIE 5.0 0110: 39.2 (#125), Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite: 34.6 (#185)
| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.0 0110 | Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1427 | 1305 |
| MMLU-Pro | — | 72% |
| GPQA (HELM) | — | 50% |
Multimodal ERNIE 5.0 0110 leads
ERNIE 5.0 0110: 39.1 (#49), Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite: 30.6 (#103)
| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.0 0110 | Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1248 | 1100 |
Multilingual ERNIE 5.0 0110 leads
ERNIE 5.0 0110: 54.3 (#47), Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite: 46.2 (#156)
| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.0 0110 | Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1436 | 1323 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1512 | 1339 |
| LMArena French | 1466 | 1346 |
| LMArena German | 1462 | 1306 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1383 | 1302 |
| LMArena Korean | 1406 | 1325 |
| LMArena Russian | 1446 | 1328 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1473 | 1313 |
Instruction Following ERNIE 5.0 0110 leads
ERNIE 5.0 0110: 74.7 (#88), Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite: 70.6 (#158)
| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.0 0110 | Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1413 | 1305 |
| LiveBench Instruction Following | — | 78.3% |
| IFEval | — | 82.4% |
Long Context ERNIE 5.0 0110 leads
ERNIE 5.0 0110: 43.4 (#90), Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite: 40.1 (#155)
| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.0 0110 | Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1422 | 1321 |
Writing & Preference ERNIE 5.0 0110 leads
ERNIE 5.0 0110: 63.4 (#64), Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite: 51.9 (#172)
| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.0 0110 | Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1445 | 1330 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1426 | 1319 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1433 | 1307 |
| WildBench | — | 79% |
| LiveBench Language | — | 34.3% |
Frequently asked questions
Is ERNIE 5.0 0110 better than Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite?
ERNIE 5.0 0110 is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.2 to 37.3 on the Noometry Index.
Is ERNIE 5.0 0110 or Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite better for coding?
ERNIE 5.0 0110 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 42.3 versus 37.4 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do ERNIE 5.0 0110 and Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite share?
18 benchmarks have published results for both models. ERNIE 5.0 0110 has 20 scored results on Noometry and Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite has 32.