Model comparison
ERNIE 5.0 0110 vs Gemini 2.5 Pro
Gemini 2.5 Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 44.9 to 41.2 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 18 shared benchmarks.
Baidu
GoogleSummary
- They share 18 benchmarks with published results for both. ERNIE 5.0 0110 scores higher in 1 category and Gemini 2.5 Pro in 8 categories; 6 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in knowledge, where Gemini 2.5 Pro leads 55.8 to 39.2.
Side by side
| ERNIE 5.0 0110 | Gemini 2.5 Pro | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Baidu | |
| Noometry Index | 41.2 | 44.9 |
| Released | — | 2025-03-25 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| Context window | — | 1.05M |
| Max output | — | 66K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $1.25 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $10 |
| Results tracked | 20 | 78 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Too close to call
ERNIE 5.0 0110: 42.3 (#94), Gemini 2.5 Pro: 42.8 (#86)
| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.0 0110 | Gemini 2.5 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1455 | 1452 |
| SWE-bench Verified | — | 57.6% |
| SWE-bench Verified (bash only) | — | 53.6% |
| Aider Polyglot | — | 83.1% |
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1227 |
| SciCode | — | 42.8% |
| GSO | — | 3.9% |
| WeirdML | — | 54% |
| LiveBench Coding | — | 85.9% |
| CadEval | — | 64% |
| ALE-Bench | — | 785.52 |
| AlgoTune | — | 1.51 |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
ERNIE 5.0 0110: —, Gemini 2.5 Pro: 29.1 (#81)
| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.0 0110 | Gemini 2.5 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Terminal-Bench | — | 32.6% |
| GDPval | — | 23.3% |
| Remote Labor Index | — | 0.8% |
| TheAgentCompany | — | 30.3% |
| τ²-bench Banking | — | 13.7% |
| DeepResearch Bench | — | 42.8% |
| BALROG | — | 43.3% |
| LMArena Search | — | 1142 |
| METR Time Horizons | — | 55.4% |
| Vending-Bench 2 | — | 573.64 |
Reasoning Gemini 2.5 Pro leads
ERNIE 5.0 0110: 16.3 (#296), Gemini 2.5 Pro: 28.8 (#85)
| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.0 0110 | Gemini 2.5 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1446 | 1455 |
| ARC-AGI-2 | — | 4.9% |
| SimpleBench | — | 62.4% |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | — | 70.3% |
| NYT Connections (extended) | 10.3% | — |
| ARC-AGI-1 | — | 41% |
| CritPt | — | 2% |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 20% |
| EnigmaEval | — | 5.6% |
| Thematic Generalization | 41.7% | — |
| LiveBench Reasoning | — | 89.8% |
| DTBench | — | 82.4% |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | — | 79.9% |
| LMCA | — | 34.8% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 145.32 |
| ForecastBench | — | 61.3 |
| LiveBench | — | 82.3% |
Math ERNIE 5.0 0110 leads
ERNIE 5.0 0110: 36.5 (#111), Gemini 2.5 Pro: 31.9 (#191)
| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.0 0110 | Gemini 2.5 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1437 | 1450 |
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | — | 24.6% |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 | — | 0% |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 84.7% |
| Omni-MATH | — | 41.6% |
| LiveBench Math | — | 90.2% |
| MATH Level 5 | — | 95.9% |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | — | 14.1% |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1) | — | 4.2% |
Knowledge Gemini 2.5 Pro leads
ERNIE 5.0 0110: 39.2 (#125), Gemini 2.5 Pro: 55.8 (#41)
| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.0 0110 | Gemini 2.5 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1427 | 1452 |
| GPQA Diamond | — | 85.3% |
| Humanity's Last Exam | — | 21.6% |
| MMLU-Pro | — | 86.3% |
| Confabulations | — | 10.6% |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | — | 7% |
| GPQA (HELM) | — | 74.9% |
Multimodal Gemini 2.5 Pro leads
ERNIE 5.0 0110: 39.1 (#49), Gemini 2.5 Pro: 44.5 (#16)
| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.0 0110 | Gemini 2.5 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1248 | 1263 |
| GeoBench | — | 86% |
| VPCT | — | 48% |
| LMArena Document | — | 1421 |
| SpatialViz-Bench | — | 44.7% |
Multilingual Gemini 2.5 Pro leads
ERNIE 5.0 0110: 54.3 (#47), Gemini 2.5 Pro: 55.5 (#30)
| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.0 0110 | Gemini 2.5 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1436 | 1452 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1512 | 1507 |
| LMArena French | 1466 | 1473 |
| LMArena German | 1462 | 1487 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1383 | 1462 |
| LMArena Korean | 1406 | 1435 |
| LMArena Russian | 1446 | 1460 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1473 | 1473 |
Instruction Following Too close to call
ERNIE 5.0 0110: 74.7 (#88), Gemini 2.5 Pro: 75.2 (#71)
| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.0 0110 | Gemini 2.5 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1413 | 1436 |
| LiveBench Instruction Following | — | 80.6% |
| IFEval | — | 84% |
Long Context Gemini 2.5 Pro leads
ERNIE 5.0 0110: 43.4 (#90), Gemini 2.5 Pro: 59.7 (#5)
| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.0 0110 | Gemini 2.5 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1422 | 1449 |
| Fiction.LiveBench | — | 91.7% |
Writing & Preference Too close to call
ERNIE 5.0 0110: 63.4 (#64), Gemini 2.5 Pro: 63.9 (#60)
| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.0 0110 | Gemini 2.5 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1445 | 1458 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1426 | 1453 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1433 | 1453 |
| Short-Story Creative Writing | — | 83.8% |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | — | 1421 |
| WildBench | — | 85.7% |
| LiveBench Language | — | 67.8% |
Frequently asked questions
Is ERNIE 5.0 0110 better than Gemini 2.5 Pro?
Gemini 2.5 Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 44.9 to 41.2 on the Noometry Index.
Is ERNIE 5.0 0110 or Gemini 2.5 Pro better for coding?
They score almost the same on coding (42.3 vs 42.8); test both on your own repository before choosing.
How many benchmarks do ERNIE 5.0 0110 and Gemini 2.5 Pro share?
18 benchmarks have published results for both models. ERNIE 5.0 0110 has 20 scored results on Noometry and Gemini 2.5 Pro has 78.