Model comparison

ERNIE 5.0 0110 vs GLM-4.7

ERNIE 5.0 0110 and GLM-4.7 score almost the same on the Noometry Index (41.8 vs 42.0), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.

Last verified . 17 shared benchmarks.

ERNIE 5.0 0110 Baidu

41.8

Rank #129 Confirmed

GLM-4.7 Z.ai (Zhipu)

42.0

Rank #124 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 17 benchmarks with published results for both. ERNIE 5.0 0110 scores higher in 5 categories and GLM-4.7 in 3 categories; 4 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in reasoning, where GLM-4.7 leads 24.3 to 17.0.
  • GLM-4.7 has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

ERNIE 5.0 0110 and GLM-4.7 specifications
ERNIE 5.0 0110GLM-4.7
ProviderBaiduZ.ai (Zhipu)
Noometry Index41.842.0
Released—2025-12-22
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window—205K
Max output—131K
Input $ / M tokens—$0.60
Output $ / M tokens—$2.20
Results tracked2036

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Too close to call

ERNIE 5.0 0110: 43.0 (#94), GLM-4.7: 44.0 (#79)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkERNIE 5.0 0110GLM-4.7
LMArena Coding14551454
LMArena WebDev—1435
SciCode—45.1%
ALE-Bench—399.48

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

ERNIE 5.0 0110: —, GLM-4.7: 26.5 (#103)

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkERNIE 5.0 0110GLM-4.7
Terminal-Bench—33.4%
Vending-Bench 2—2,377

Reasoning GLM-4.7 leads

ERNIE 5.0 0110: 17.0 (#297), GLM-4.7: 24.3 (#164)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkERNIE 5.0 0110GLM-4.7
LMArena Hard Prompts14451443
SimpleBench—47.7%
NYT Connections (extended)10.3%—
CritPt—1.7%
Chess Puzzles—6%
Thematic Generalization41.7%—
Epoch Capabilities Index—143.51

Math Too close to call

ERNIE 5.0 0110: 39.3 (#110), GLM-4.7: 38.6 (#135)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkERNIE 5.0 0110GLM-4.7
LMArena Math14371423
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025—83.3%
ProofBench—6%
FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set)—2.4%
FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1)—0%

Knowledge GLM-4.7 leads

ERNIE 5.0 0110: 39.8 (#128), GLM-4.7: 47.0 (#80)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkERNIE 5.0 0110GLM-4.7
LMArena Expert14281424
GPQA Diamond—83.3%
SimpleQA Verified—32.2%
Vectara Hallucination Rate—11.7%

Multimodal Not comparable

ERNIE 5.0 0110: 39.9 (#53), GLM-4.7: —

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkERNIE 5.0 0110GLM-4.7
LMArena Vision1249—

Multilingual ERNIE 5.0 0110 leads

ERNIE 5.0 0110: 54.1 (#49), GLM-4.7: 52.8 (#79)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkERNIE 5.0 0110GLM-4.7
LMArena Non-English14361417
LMArena Chinese15121495
LMArena French14671432
LMArena German14601424
LMArena Japanese13821439
LMArena Korean14061399
LMArena Russian14461423
LMArena Spanish14731434

Instruction Following Too close to call

ERNIE 5.0 0110: 74.5 (#92), GLM-4.7: 74.4 (#95)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkERNIE 5.0 0110GLM-4.7
LMArena Instruction Following14131411

Long Context Too close to call

ERNIE 5.0 0110: 43.4 (#95), GLM-4.7: 42.8 (#116)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkERNIE 5.0 0110GLM-4.7
LMArena Longer Query14221432
CL-bench—15.9%
CL-bench Life—10.9%

Writing & Preference ERNIE 5.0 0110 leads

ERNIE 5.0 0110: 63.1 (#66), GLM-4.7: 60.9 (#93)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkERNIE 5.0 0110GLM-4.7
LMArena Text14451435
LMArena Creative Writing14261401
LMArena Multi-Turn14341446
EQ-Bench Creative Writing—1413

Frequently asked questions

Is ERNIE 5.0 0110 better than GLM-4.7?

ERNIE 5.0 0110 and GLM-4.7 score almost the same on the Noometry Index (41.8 vs 42.0), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.

Is ERNIE 5.0 0110 or GLM-4.7 better for coding?

They score almost the same on coding (43.0 vs 44.0); test both on your own repository before choosing.

How many benchmarks do ERNIE 5.0 0110 and GLM-4.7 share?

17 benchmarks have published results for both models. ERNIE 5.0 0110 has 20 scored results on Noometry and GLM-4.7 has 36.

Related comparisons

Go deeper