Noometry

Model comparison

ERNIE 5.0 0110 vs GLM-5.3-Flash

GLM-5.3-Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 49.6 to 41.2 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 18 shared benchmarks.

ERNIE 5.0 0110 Baidu

41.2

Rank #129 Confirmed

GLM-5.3-Flash Z.ai (Zhipu)

49.6

Rank #45 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 18 benchmarks with published results for both. ERNIE 5.0 0110 scores higher in 0 categories and GLM-5.3-Flash in 9 categories; 9 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in knowledge, where GLM-5.3-Flash leads 58.4 to 39.2.
  • GLM-5.3-Flash has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

ERNIE 5.0 0110GLM-5.3-Flash
ProviderBaiduZ.ai (Zhipu)
Noometry Index41.249.6
Released—2026-08-20
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window—1M
Max output—131K
Input $ / M tokens—$0.15
Output $ / M tokens—$0.50
Results tracked2036

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding GLM-5.3-Flash leads

ERNIE 5.0 0110: 42.3 (#94), GLM-5.3-Flash: 53.7 (#26)

BenchmarkERNIE 5.0 0110GLM-5.3-Flash
LMArena Coding14551506
DeepSWE—63.4%
FrontierCode—31.8%
LMArena WebDev—1614
SciCode—51.6%
ALE-Bench—303.55

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

ERNIE 5.0 0110: —, GLM-5.3-Flash: 34.3 (#41)

BenchmarkERNIE 5.0 0110GLM-5.3-Flash
APEX-Agents—52.8%
GDP.pdf—14%

Reasoning GLM-5.3-Flash leads

ERNIE 5.0 0110: 16.3 (#296), GLM-5.3-Flash: 31.7 (#69)

BenchmarkERNIE 5.0 0110GLM-5.3-Flash
LMArena Hard Prompts14461490
NYT Connections (extended)10.3%—
CritPt—15.4%
Chess Puzzles—14%
Thematic Generalization41.7%—
Mystery Game Puzzles—8%
Surface Evolver Bench—52.5%
Bench to the Future 3—0.15
Epoch Capabilities Index—151.9

Math GLM-5.3-Flash leads

ERNIE 5.0 0110: 36.5 (#111), GLM-5.3-Flash: 53.1 (#38)

BenchmarkERNIE 5.0 0110GLM-5.3-Flash
LMArena Math14371499
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)—55.8%
FrontierMath Tier 4—17.1%
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025—93.9%
ProofBench—21%

Knowledge GLM-5.3-Flash leads

ERNIE 5.0 0110: 39.2 (#125), GLM-5.3-Flash: 58.4 (#33)

BenchmarkERNIE 5.0 0110GLM-5.3-Flash
LMArena Expert14271512
GPQA Diamond—90.2%

Multimodal GLM-5.3-Flash leads

ERNIE 5.0 0110: 39.1 (#49), GLM-5.3-Flash: 42.6 (#25)

BenchmarkERNIE 5.0 0110GLM-5.3-Flash
LMArena Vision12481304

Multilingual GLM-5.3-Flash leads

ERNIE 5.0 0110: 54.3 (#47), GLM-5.3-Flash: 56.2 (#24)

BenchmarkERNIE 5.0 0110GLM-5.3-Flash
LMArena Non-English14361462
LMArena Chinese15121529
LMArena French14661495
LMArena German14621457
LMArena Japanese13831420
LMArena Korean14061443
LMArena Russian14461472
LMArena Spanish14731471

Instruction Following GLM-5.3-Flash leads

ERNIE 5.0 0110: 74.7 (#88), GLM-5.3-Flash: 77.8 (#17)

BenchmarkERNIE 5.0 0110GLM-5.3-Flash
LMArena Instruction Following14131480

Long Context GLM-5.3-Flash leads

ERNIE 5.0 0110: 43.4 (#90), GLM-5.3-Flash: 45.3 (#41)

BenchmarkERNIE 5.0 0110GLM-5.3-Flash
LMArena Longer Query14221479

Writing & Preference GLM-5.3-Flash leads

ERNIE 5.0 0110: 63.4 (#64), GLM-5.3-Flash: 65.4 (#49)

BenchmarkERNIE 5.0 0110GLM-5.3-Flash
LMArena Text14451471
LMArena Creative Writing14261440
LMArena Multi-Turn14331471

Frequently asked questions

Is ERNIE 5.0 0110 better than GLM-5.3-Flash?

GLM-5.3-Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 49.6 to 41.2 on the Noometry Index.

Is ERNIE 5.0 0110 or GLM-5.3-Flash better for coding?

GLM-5.3-Flash scores higher on coding benchmarks: 53.7 versus 42.3 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do ERNIE 5.0 0110 and GLM-5.3-Flash share?

18 benchmarks have published results for both models. ERNIE 5.0 0110 has 20 scored results on Noometry and GLM-5.3-Flash has 36.

Related comparisons

Go deeper