Noometry

Model comparison

ERNIE 5.0 0110 vs Grok 3

ERNIE 5.0 0110 is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.2 to 39.6 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 17 shared benchmarks.

ERNIE 5.0 0110 Baidu

41.2

Rank #129 Confirmed

Grok 3 xAI

39.6

Rank #150 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 17 benchmarks with published results for both. ERNIE 5.0 0110 scores higher in 6 categories and Grok 3 in 2 categories; 5 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in writing & preference, where ERNIE 5.0 0110 leads 63.4 to 56.0.

Side by side

ERNIE 5.0 0110Grok 3
ProviderBaiduxAI
Noometry Index41.239.6
Released—2025-04-09
WeightsProprietaryProprietary
Context window——
Max output——
Input $ / M tokens——
Output $ / M tokens——
Results tracked2040

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Too close to call

ERNIE 5.0 0110: 42.3 (#94), Grok 3: 41.5 (#113)

BenchmarkERNIE 5.0 0110Grok 3
LMArena Coding14551432
Aider Polyglot—53.3%
WeirdML—37.2%

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

ERNIE 5.0 0110: —, Grok 3: 30.2 (#69)

BenchmarkERNIE 5.0 0110Grok 3
BALROG—29.5%

Reasoning ERNIE 5.0 0110 leads

ERNIE 5.0 0110: 16.3 (#296), Grok 3: 13.8 (#322)

BenchmarkERNIE 5.0 0110Grok 3
LMArena Hard Prompts14461433
ARC-AGI-2—0%
SimpleBench—36.1%
Kagi LLM Benchmark—61.3%
NYT Connections (extended)10.3%—
ARC-AGI-1—5.5%
Thematic Generalization41.7%—
Epoch Capabilities Index—138.34

Math Too close to call

ERNIE 5.0 0110: 36.5 (#111), Grok 3: 36.2 (#122)

BenchmarkERNIE 5.0 0110Grok 3
LMArena Math14371390
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025—55.6%
Omni-MATH—46.4%
MATH Level 5—88.7%
FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set)—3.8%
FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1)—0%

Knowledge Grok 3 leads

ERNIE 5.0 0110: 39.2 (#125), Grok 3: 46.0 (#76)

BenchmarkERNIE 5.0 0110Grok 3
LMArena Expert14271420
GPQA Diamond—75.8%
MMLU-Pro—78.8%
Confabulations—14.2%
Vectara Hallucination Rate—5.8%
GPQA (HELM)—65%

Multimodal Not comparable

ERNIE 5.0 0110: 39.1 (#49), Grok 3: —

BenchmarkERNIE 5.0 0110Grok 3
LMArena Vision1248—

Multilingual ERNIE 5.0 0110 leads

ERNIE 5.0 0110: 54.3 (#47), Grok 3: 52.5 (#81)

BenchmarkERNIE 5.0 0110Grok 3
LMArena Non-English14361411
LMArena Chinese15121448
LMArena French14661460
LMArena German14621431
LMArena Japanese13831389
LMArena Korean14061374
LMArena Russian14461416
LMArena Spanish14731417

Instruction Following Too close to call

ERNIE 5.0 0110: 74.7 (#88), Grok 3: 75.2 (#69)

BenchmarkERNIE 5.0 0110Grok 3
LMArena Instruction Following14131409
IFEval—88.4%

Long Context ERNIE 5.0 0110 leads

ERNIE 5.0 0110: 43.4 (#90), Grok 3: 38.7 (#187)

BenchmarkERNIE 5.0 0110Grok 3
LMArena Longer Query14221439
Fiction.LiveBench—58.3%

Writing & Preference ERNIE 5.0 0110 leads

ERNIE 5.0 0110: 63.4 (#64), Grok 3: 56.0 (#136)

BenchmarkERNIE 5.0 0110Grok 3
LMArena Text14451426
LMArena Creative Writing14261414
LMArena Multi-Turn14331424
Short-Story Creative Writing—76.4%
EQ-Bench Creative Writing—1186
WildBench—84.9%

Frequently asked questions

Is ERNIE 5.0 0110 better than Grok 3?

ERNIE 5.0 0110 is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.2 to 39.6 on the Noometry Index.

Is ERNIE 5.0 0110 or Grok 3 better for coding?

They score almost the same on coding (42.3 vs 41.5); test both on your own repository before choosing.

How many benchmarks do ERNIE 5.0 0110 and Grok 3 share?

17 benchmarks have published results for both models. ERNIE 5.0 0110 has 20 scored results on Noometry and Grok 3 has 40.

Related comparisons

Go deeper