Noometry

Model comparison

ERNIE 5.0 0110 vs Grok 4

Grok 4 is the stronger model overall, scoring 47.8 to 41.2 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 18 shared benchmarks.

ERNIE 5.0 0110 Baidu

41.2

Rank #129 Confirmed

Grok 4 xAI

47.8

Rank #49 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 18 benchmarks with published results for both. ERNIE 5.0 0110 scores higher in 3 categories and Grok 4 in 6 categories; 9 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in reasoning, where Grok 4 leads 36.9 to 16.3.

Side by side

ERNIE 5.0 0110Grok 4
ProviderBaiduxAI
Noometry Index41.247.8
Released—2025-07-09
WeightsProprietaryProprietary
Context window——
Max output——
Input $ / M tokens——
Output $ / M tokens——
Results tracked2048

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Grok 4 leads

ERNIE 5.0 0110: 42.3 (#94), Grok 4: 49.9 (#44)

BenchmarkERNIE 5.0 0110Grok 4
LMArena Coding14551408
Aider Polyglot—79.6%
WeirdML—45.7%

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

ERNIE 5.0 0110: —, Grok 4: 32.1 (#62)

BenchmarkERNIE 5.0 0110Grok 4
Terminal-Bench—27.2%
Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard—63%
GDPval—21.1%
Cybench—43%
DeepResearch Bench—47.3%
BALROG—43.6%
LMArena Search—1142
METR Time Horizons—66.6%

Reasoning Grok 4 leads

ERNIE 5.0 0110: 16.3 (#296), Grok 4: 36.9 (#59)

BenchmarkERNIE 5.0 0110Grok 4
LMArena Hard Prompts14461409
ARC-AGI-2—16%
SimpleBench—60.5%
Kagi LLM Benchmark—73.6%
NYT Connections (extended)10.3%—
ARC-AGI-1—66.7%
Chess Puzzles—28%
Thematic Generalization41.7%—
Epoch Capabilities Index—146.46
ForecastBench—60.9

Math Grok 4 leads

ERNIE 5.0 0110: 36.5 (#111), Grok 4: 46.5 (#58)

BenchmarkERNIE 5.0 0110Grok 4
LMArena Math14371422
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025—84%
Omni-MATH—60.3%
FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set)—19.7%
FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1)—2.1%

Knowledge Grok 4 leads

ERNIE 5.0 0110: 39.2 (#125), Grok 4: 53.7 (#50)

BenchmarkERNIE 5.0 0110Grok 4
LMArena Expert14271417
GPQA Diamond—87%
MMLU-Pro—85.1%
Confabulations—12.4%
GPQA (HELM)—72.7%

Multimodal ERNIE 5.0 0110 leads

ERNIE 5.0 0110: 39.1 (#49), Grok 4: 33.1 (#89)

BenchmarkERNIE 5.0 0110Grok 4
LMArena Vision12481211
GeoBench—45%

Multilingual ERNIE 5.0 0110 leads

ERNIE 5.0 0110: 54.3 (#47), Grok 4: 52.0 (#98)

BenchmarkERNIE 5.0 0110Grok 4
LMArena Non-English14361403
LMArena Chinese15121428
LMArena French14661418
LMArena German14621429
LMArena Japanese13831396
LMArena Korean14061376
LMArena Russian14461409
LMArena Spanish14731419

Instruction Following Grok 4 leads

ERNIE 5.0 0110: 74.7 (#88), Grok 4: 79.4 (#4)

BenchmarkERNIE 5.0 0110Grok 4
LMArena Instruction Following14131387
IFEval—94.9%

Long Context Grok 4 leads

ERNIE 5.0 0110: 43.4 (#90), Grok 4: 63.1 (#4)

BenchmarkERNIE 5.0 0110Grok 4
LMArena Longer Query14221409
Fiction.LiveBench—94.4%

Writing & Preference ERNIE 5.0 0110 leads

ERNIE 5.0 0110: 63.4 (#64), Grok 4: 58.7 (#111)

BenchmarkERNIE 5.0 0110Grok 4
LMArena Text14451412
LMArena Creative Writing14261397
LMArena Multi-Turn14331416
Short-Story Creative Writing—76.9%
WildBench—79.7%

Frequently asked questions

Is ERNIE 5.0 0110 better than Grok 4?

Grok 4 is the stronger model overall, scoring 47.8 to 41.2 on the Noometry Index.

Is ERNIE 5.0 0110 or Grok 4 better for coding?

Grok 4 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 49.9 versus 42.3 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do ERNIE 5.0 0110 and Grok 4 share?

18 benchmarks have published results for both models. ERNIE 5.0 0110 has 20 scored results on Noometry and Grok 4 has 48.

Related comparisons

Go deeper