Model comparison

ERNIE 5.0 0110 vs Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct

ERNIE 5.0 0110 is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.8 to 32.7 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 11 shared benchmarks.

ERNIE 5.0 0110 Baidu

41.8

Rank #129 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 11 benchmarks with published results for both. ERNIE 5.0 0110 scores higher in 7 categories and Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct in 1 category; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in writing & preference, where ERNIE 5.0 0110 leads 63.1 to 42.1.
  • Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

ERNIE 5.0 0110 and Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct specifications
ERNIE 5.0 0110Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct
ProviderBaiduAllen Institute for AI (Ai2)
Noometry Index41.832.7
Released——
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window——
Max output——
Input $ / M tokens——
Output $ / M tokens——
Results tracked2016

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding ERNIE 5.0 0110 leads

ERNIE 5.0 0110: 43.0 (#94), Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 35.2 (#227)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkERNIE 5.0 0110Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct
LMArena Coding14551210

Reasoning Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct leads

ERNIE 5.0 0110: 17.0 (#297), Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 23.6 (#175)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkERNIE 5.0 0110Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct
LMArena Hard Prompts14451208
NYT Connections (extended)10.3%—
Thematic Generalization41.7%—

Math ERNIE 5.0 0110 leads

ERNIE 5.0 0110: 39.3 (#110), Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 26.8 (#255)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkERNIE 5.0 0110Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct
LMArena Math14371208
Omni-MATH—16.1%

Knowledge ERNIE 5.0 0110 leads

ERNIE 5.0 0110: 39.8 (#128), Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 19.5 (#279)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkERNIE 5.0 0110Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct
MMLU-Pro—41.4%
GPQA (HELM)—28.7%
LMArena Expert1428—

Multimodal Not comparable

ERNIE 5.0 0110: 39.9 (#53), Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: —

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkERNIE 5.0 0110Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct
LMArena Vision1249—

Multilingual ERNIE 5.0 0110 leads

ERNIE 5.0 0110: 54.1 (#49), Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 34.8 (#248)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkERNIE 5.0 0110Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct
LMArena Non-English14361160
LMArena Chinese15121192
LMArena Russian14461187
LMArena French1467—
LMArena German1460—
LMArena Japanese1382—
LMArena Korean1406—
LMArena Spanish1473—

Instruction Following ERNIE 5.0 0110 leads

ERNIE 5.0 0110: 74.5 (#92), Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 61.5 (#244)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkERNIE 5.0 0110Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct
LMArena Instruction Following14131186
IFEval—78%

Long Context ERNIE 5.0 0110 leads

ERNIE 5.0 0110: 43.4 (#95), Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 36.2 (#234)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkERNIE 5.0 0110Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct
LMArena Longer Query14221194

Writing & Preference ERNIE 5.0 0110 leads

ERNIE 5.0 0110: 63.1 (#66), Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 42.1 (#236)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkERNIE 5.0 0110Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct
LMArena Text14451218
LMArena Creative Writing14261199
LMArena Multi-Turn14341221
WildBench—73.4%

Frequently asked questions

Is ERNIE 5.0 0110 better than Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct?

ERNIE 5.0 0110 is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.8 to 32.7 on the Noometry Index.

Is ERNIE 5.0 0110 or Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct better for coding?

ERNIE 5.0 0110 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 43.0 versus 35.2 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do ERNIE 5.0 0110 and Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct share?

11 benchmarks have published results for both models. ERNIE 5.0 0110 has 20 scored results on Noometry and Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct has 16.

Related comparisons

Go deeper