Model comparison
ERNIE 5.0 0110 vs Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct
ERNIE 5.0 0110 is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.8 to 39.4 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 16 shared benchmarks.
Summary
- They share 16 benchmarks with published results for both. ERNIE 5.0 0110 scores higher in 7 categories and Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct in 1 category; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where ERNIE 5.0 0110 leads 63.1 to 50.2.
- Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| ERNIE 5.0 0110 | Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Baidu | Allen Institute for AI (Ai2) |
| Noometry Index | 41.8 | 39.4 |
| Released | — | — |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 20 | 16 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding ERNIE 5.0 0110 leads
ERNIE 5.0 0110: 43.0 (#94), Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 39.5 (#157)
| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.0 0110 | Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1455 | 1347 |
Reasoning Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct leads
ERNIE 5.0 0110: 17.0 (#297), Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 26.4 (#132)
| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.0 0110 | Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1445 | 1322 |
| NYT Connections (extended) | 10.3% | — |
| Thematic Generalization | 41.7% | — |
Math ERNIE 5.0 0110 leads
ERNIE 5.0 0110: 39.3 (#110), Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 36.3 (#167)
| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.0 0110 | Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1437 | 1305 |
Knowledge ERNIE 5.0 0110 leads
ERNIE 5.0 0110: 39.8 (#128), Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 36.1 (#175)
| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.0 0110 | Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1428 | 1308 |
Multimodal Not comparable
ERNIE 5.0 0110: 39.9 (#53), Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: —
| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.0 0110 | Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1249 | — |
Multilingual ERNIE 5.0 0110 leads
ERNIE 5.0 0110: 54.1 (#49), Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 42.6 (#191)
| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.0 0110 | Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1436 | 1275 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1512 | 1304 |
| LMArena French | 1467 | 1328 |
| LMArena German | 1460 | 1282 |
| LMArena Korean | 1406 | 1206 |
| LMArena Russian | 1446 | 1268 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1473 | 1336 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1382 | — |
Instruction Following ERNIE 5.0 0110 leads
ERNIE 5.0 0110: 74.5 (#92), Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 68.6 (#187)
| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.0 0110 | Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1413 | 1299 |
Long Context ERNIE 5.0 0110 leads
ERNIE 5.0 0110: 43.4 (#95), Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 39.9 (#166)
| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.0 0110 | Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1422 | 1312 |
Writing & Preference ERNIE 5.0 0110 leads
ERNIE 5.0 0110: 63.1 (#66), Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 50.2 (#185)
| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.0 0110 | Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1445 | 1311 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1426 | 1264 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1434 | 1309 |
Frequently asked questions
Is ERNIE 5.0 0110 better than Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct?
ERNIE 5.0 0110 is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.8 to 39.4 on the Noometry Index.
Is ERNIE 5.0 0110 or Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct better for coding?
ERNIE 5.0 0110 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 43.0 versus 39.5 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do ERNIE 5.0 0110 and Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct share?
16 benchmarks have published results for both models. ERNIE 5.0 0110 has 20 scored results on Noometry and Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct has 16.