Model comparison

ERNIE 5.0 0110 vs Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct

ERNIE 5.0 0110 is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.8 to 39.4 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 16 shared benchmarks.

ERNIE 5.0 0110 Baidu

41.8

Rank #129 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 16 benchmarks with published results for both. ERNIE 5.0 0110 scores higher in 7 categories and Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct in 1 category; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in writing & preference, where ERNIE 5.0 0110 leads 63.1 to 50.2.
  • Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

ERNIE 5.0 0110 and Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct specifications
ERNIE 5.0 0110Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct
ProviderBaiduAllen Institute for AI (Ai2)
Noometry Index41.839.4
Released——
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window——
Max output——
Input $ / M tokens——
Output $ / M tokens——
Results tracked2016

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding ERNIE 5.0 0110 leads

ERNIE 5.0 0110: 43.0 (#94), Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 39.5 (#157)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkERNIE 5.0 0110Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct
LMArena Coding14551347

Reasoning Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct leads

ERNIE 5.0 0110: 17.0 (#297), Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 26.4 (#132)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkERNIE 5.0 0110Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct
LMArena Hard Prompts14451322
NYT Connections (extended)10.3%—
Thematic Generalization41.7%—

Math ERNIE 5.0 0110 leads

ERNIE 5.0 0110: 39.3 (#110), Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 36.3 (#167)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkERNIE 5.0 0110Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct
LMArena Math14371305

Knowledge ERNIE 5.0 0110 leads

ERNIE 5.0 0110: 39.8 (#128), Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 36.1 (#175)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkERNIE 5.0 0110Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct
LMArena Expert14281308

Multimodal Not comparable

ERNIE 5.0 0110: 39.9 (#53), Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: —

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkERNIE 5.0 0110Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct
LMArena Vision1249—

Multilingual ERNIE 5.0 0110 leads

ERNIE 5.0 0110: 54.1 (#49), Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 42.6 (#191)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkERNIE 5.0 0110Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct
LMArena Non-English14361275
LMArena Chinese15121304
LMArena French14671328
LMArena German14601282
LMArena Korean14061206
LMArena Russian14461268
LMArena Spanish14731336
LMArena Japanese1382—

Instruction Following ERNIE 5.0 0110 leads

ERNIE 5.0 0110: 74.5 (#92), Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 68.6 (#187)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkERNIE 5.0 0110Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct
LMArena Instruction Following14131299

Long Context ERNIE 5.0 0110 leads

ERNIE 5.0 0110: 43.4 (#95), Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 39.9 (#166)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkERNIE 5.0 0110Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct
LMArena Longer Query14221312

Writing & Preference ERNIE 5.0 0110 leads

ERNIE 5.0 0110: 63.1 (#66), Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 50.2 (#185)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkERNIE 5.0 0110Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct
LMArena Text14451311
LMArena Creative Writing14261264
LMArena Multi-Turn14341309

Frequently asked questions

Is ERNIE 5.0 0110 better than Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct?

ERNIE 5.0 0110 is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.8 to 39.4 on the Noometry Index.

Is ERNIE 5.0 0110 or Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct better for coding?

ERNIE 5.0 0110 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 43.0 versus 39.5 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do ERNIE 5.0 0110 and Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct share?

16 benchmarks have published results for both models. ERNIE 5.0 0110 has 20 scored results on Noometry and Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct has 16.

Related comparisons

Go deeper