Model comparison
ERNIE 5.1 vs Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13
ERNIE 5.1 is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.1 to 37.0 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 17 shared benchmarks.
BaiduSummary
- They share 17 benchmarks with published results for both. ERNIE 5.1 scores higher in 7 categories and Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13 in 1 category; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where ERNIE 5.1 leads 65.3 to 47.5.
Side by side
| ERNIE 5.1 | Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13 | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Baidu | xAI |
| Noometry Index | 43.1 | 37.0 |
| Released | — | 2024-08-13 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 19 | 17 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding ERNIE 5.1 leads
ERNIE 5.1: 43.4 (#78), Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13: 36.4 (#194)
| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.1 | Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1488 | 1269 |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
ERNIE 5.1: —, Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13: —
| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.1 | Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Search | 1227 | — |
Reasoning Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13 leads
ERNIE 5.1: 20.9 (#209), Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13: 23.7 (#162)
| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.1 | Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1481 | 1255 |
| NYT Connections (extended) | 23.4% | — |
Math ERNIE 5.1 leads
ERNIE 5.1: 37.5 (#96), Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13: 32.8 (#185)
| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.1 | Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1481 | 1265 |
Knowledge ERNIE 5.1 leads
ERNIE 5.1: 41.2 (#103), Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13: 33.4 (#195)
| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.1 | Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1491 | 1238 |
Multilingual ERNIE 5.1 leads
ERNIE 5.1: 55.7 (#28), Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13: 41.6 (#203)
| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.1 | Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1455 | 1257 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1507 | 1262 |
| LMArena French | 1486 | 1285 |
| LMArena German | 1470 | 1273 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1422 | 1213 |
| LMArena Korean | 1428 | 1195 |
| LMArena Russian | 1459 | 1261 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1472 | 1278 |
Instruction Following ERNIE 5.1 leads
ERNIE 5.1: 76.9 (#35), Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13: 65.7 (#215)
| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.1 | Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1460 | 1245 |
Long Context ERNIE 5.1 leads
ERNIE 5.1: 44.7 (#56), Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13: 38.4 (#191)
| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.1 | Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1462 | 1267 |
Writing & Preference ERNIE 5.1 leads
ERNIE 5.1: 65.3 (#50), Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13: 47.5 (#207)
| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.1 | Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1468 | 1281 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1440 | 1242 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1471 | 1265 |
Frequently asked questions
Is ERNIE 5.1 better than Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13?
ERNIE 5.1 is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.1 to 37.0 on the Noometry Index.
Is ERNIE 5.1 or Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13 better for coding?
ERNIE 5.1 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 43.4 versus 36.4 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do ERNIE 5.1 and Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13 share?
17 benchmarks have published results for both models. ERNIE 5.1 has 19 scored results on Noometry and Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13 has 17.