Model comparison

ERNIE 5.1 vs MiMo-V2.5

ERNIE 5.1 and MiMo-V2.5 score almost the same on the Noometry Index (43.1 vs 43.0), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.

Last verified . 17 shared benchmarks.

ERNIE 5.1 Baidu

43.1

Rank #87 Confirmed

MiMo-V2.5 Xiaomi

43.0

Rank #89 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 17 benchmarks with published results for both. ERNIE 5.1 scores higher in 6 categories and MiMo-V2.5 in 2 categories; 6 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in reasoning, where MiMo-V2.5 leads 27.8 to 20.9.
  • MiMo-V2.5 has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

ERNIE 5.1 and MiMo-V2.5 specifications
ERNIE 5.1MiMo-V2.5
ProviderBaiduXiaomi
Noometry Index43.143.0
Released—2026-04-22
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window—1.05M
Max output—131K
Input $ / M tokens—$0.14
Output $ / M tokens—$0.28
Results tracked1923

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Too close to call

ERNIE 5.1: 43.4 (#78), MiMo-V2.5: 43.6 (#75)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkERNIE 5.1MiMo-V2.5
LMArena Coding14881469
LMArena WebDev—1438
SciCode—43.1%
ALE-Bench—513.95

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

ERNIE 5.1: —, MiMo-V2.5: —

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkERNIE 5.1MiMo-V2.5
LMArena Search1227—

Reasoning MiMo-V2.5 leads

ERNIE 5.1: 20.9 (#209), MiMo-V2.5: 27.8 (#98)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkERNIE 5.1MiMo-V2.5
LMArena Hard Prompts14811450
NYT Connections (extended)23.4%—
CritPt—3.7%

Math ERNIE 5.1 leads

ERNIE 5.1: 37.5 (#96), MiMo-V2.5: 35.4 (#145)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkERNIE 5.1MiMo-V2.5
LMArena Math14811436
ProofBench—16%

Knowledge ERNIE 5.1 leads

ERNIE 5.1: 41.2 (#103), MiMo-V2.5: 40.2 (#109)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkERNIE 5.1MiMo-V2.5
LMArena Expert14911459

Multimodal Not comparable

ERNIE 5.1: —, MiMo-V2.5: 39.0 (#53)

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkERNIE 5.1MiMo-V2.5
LMArena Vision—1245

Multilingual ERNIE 5.1 leads

ERNIE 5.1: 55.7 (#28), MiMo-V2.5: 52.0 (#96)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkERNIE 5.1MiMo-V2.5
LMArena Non-English14551404
LMArena Chinese15071467
LMArena French14861447
LMArena German14701421
LMArena Japanese14221304
LMArena Korean14281363
LMArena Russian14591395
LMArena Spanish14721412

Instruction Following ERNIE 5.1 leads

ERNIE 5.1: 76.9 (#35), MiMo-V2.5: 75.7 (#55)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkERNIE 5.1MiMo-V2.5
LMArena Instruction Following14601433

Long Context Too close to call

ERNIE 5.1: 44.7 (#56), MiMo-V2.5: 44.1 (#69)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkERNIE 5.1MiMo-V2.5
LMArena Longer Query14621444

Writing & Preference ERNIE 5.1 leads

ERNIE 5.1: 65.3 (#50), MiMo-V2.5: 61.8 (#82)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkERNIE 5.1MiMo-V2.5
LMArena Text14681427
LMArena Creative Writing14401392
LMArena Multi-Turn14711445

Frequently asked questions

Is ERNIE 5.1 better than MiMo-V2.5?

ERNIE 5.1 and MiMo-V2.5 score almost the same on the Noometry Index (43.1 vs 43.0), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.

Is ERNIE 5.1 or MiMo-V2.5 better for coding?

They score almost the same on coding (43.4 vs 43.6); test both on your own repository before choosing.

How many benchmarks do ERNIE 5.1 and MiMo-V2.5 share?

17 benchmarks have published results for both models. ERNIE 5.1 has 19 scored results on Noometry and MiMo-V2.5 has 23.

Related comparisons

Go deeper