Model comparison
ERNIE 5.1 vs Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct
ERNIE 5.1 is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.1 to 32.4 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 17 shared benchmarks.
Summary
- They share 17 benchmarks with published results for both. ERNIE 5.1 scores higher in 8 categories and Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct in 0 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where ERNIE 5.1 leads 65.3 to 34.3.
- Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| ERNIE 5.1 | Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Baidu | Microsoft |
| Noometry Index | 43.1 | 32.4 |
| Released | — | — |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 19 | 17 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding ERNIE 5.1 leads
ERNIE 5.1: 43.4 (#78), Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct: 32.3 (#263)
| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.1 | Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1488 | 1130 |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
ERNIE 5.1: —, Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct: —
| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.1 | Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Search | 1227 | — |
Reasoning Too close to call
ERNIE 5.1: 20.9 (#209), Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct: 20.8 (#214)
| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.1 | Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1481 | 1127 |
| NYT Connections (extended) | 23.4% | — |
Math ERNIE 5.1 leads
ERNIE 5.1: 37.5 (#96), Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct: 30.9 (#202)
| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.1 | Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1481 | 1173 |
Knowledge ERNIE 5.1 leads
ERNIE 5.1: 41.2 (#103), Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct: 29.6 (#226)
| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.1 | Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1491 | 1108 |
Multilingual ERNIE 5.1 leads
ERNIE 5.1: 55.7 (#28), Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct: 30.8 (#258)
| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.1 | Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1455 | 1094 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1507 | 1108 |
| LMArena French | 1486 | 1109 |
| LMArena German | 1470 | 1101 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1422 | 1042 |
| LMArena Korean | 1428 | 954 |
| LMArena Russian | 1459 | 1145 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1472 | 1095 |
Instruction Following ERNIE 5.1 leads
ERNIE 5.1: 76.9 (#35), Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct: 57.8 (#263)
| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.1 | Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1460 | 1114 |
Long Context ERNIE 5.1 leads
ERNIE 5.1: 44.7 (#56), Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct: 33.9 (#250)
| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.1 | Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1462 | 1120 |
Writing & Preference ERNIE 5.1 leads
ERNIE 5.1: 65.3 (#50), Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct: 34.3 (#267)
| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.1 | Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1468 | 1138 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1440 | 1106 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1471 | 1088 |
Frequently asked questions
Is ERNIE 5.1 better than Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct?
ERNIE 5.1 is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.1 to 32.4 on the Noometry Index.
Is ERNIE 5.1 or Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct better for coding?
ERNIE 5.1 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 43.4 versus 32.3 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do ERNIE 5.1 and Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct share?
17 benchmarks have published results for both models. ERNIE 5.1 has 19 scored results on Noometry and Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct has 17.