Model comparison

Falcon-180B vs Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B

Falcon-180B is the stronger model overall, scoring 31.8 to 29.7 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 6 shared benchmarks.

Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B Google

29.7

Rank #292 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 6 benchmarks with published results for both. Falcon-180B scores higher in 0 categories and Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B in 4 categories; 3 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B leads 43.0 to 29.3.
  • Falcon-180B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Falcon-180B and Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B specifications
Falcon-180BGemini 1.5 Flash 8B
ProviderTechnology Innovation InstituteGoogle
Noometry Index31.829.7
Released2023-09-062024-10-03
WeightsOpenProprietary
Context window——
Max output——
Input $ / M tokens——
Output $ / M tokens——
Results tracked1621

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Not comparable

Falcon-180B: —, Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B: 34.9 (#221)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkFalcon-180BGemini 1.5 Flash 8B
LMArena Coding—1218

Reasoning Too close to call

Falcon-180B: 18.3 (#266), Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B: 19.2 (#242)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkFalcon-180BGemini 1.5 Flash 8B
LMArena Hard Prompts10071210
DTBench—50%
Epoch Capabilities Index111.89—
HellaSwag89%—
LAMBADA79.8%—
PIQA84.9%—
WinoGrande87.1%—

Math Not comparable

Falcon-180B: —, Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B: 13.3 (#296)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkFalcon-180BGemini 1.5 Flash 8B
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025—4.6%
LMArena Math—1207
GSM8K54.4%—

Knowledge Not comparable

Falcon-180B: —, Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B: 16.0 (#285)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkFalcon-180BGemini 1.5 Flash 8B
GPQA Diamond—33%
LMArena Expert—1185
ARC (AI2) Challenge67.8%—
BoolQ89%—
MMLU70.6%—
OpenBookQA64.2%—

Multimodal Not comparable

Falcon-180B: —, Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B: 27.6 (#110)

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkFalcon-180BGemini 1.5 Flash 8B
LMArena Vision—1044

Multilingual Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B leads

Falcon-180B: 25.3 (#281), Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B: 38.6 (#224)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkFalcon-180BGemini 1.5 Flash 8B
LMArena Non-English10001215
LMArena Chinese—1231
LMArena French—1233
LMArena German—1206
LMArena Japanese—1150
LMArena Korean—1140
LMArena Russian—1236
LMArena Spanish—1212

Instruction Following Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B leads

Falcon-180B: 53.6 (#281), Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B: 63.1 (#231)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkFalcon-180BGemini 1.5 Flash 8B
LMArena Instruction Following10471199

Long Context Not comparable

Falcon-180B: —, Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B: 36.9 (#220)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkFalcon-180BGemini 1.5 Flash 8B
LMArena Longer Query—1219

Writing & Preference Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B leads

Falcon-180B: 29.3 (#290), Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B: 43.0 (#227)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkFalcon-180BGemini 1.5 Flash 8B
LMArena Text10541226
LMArena Creative Writing10891218
LMArena Multi-Turn10131185

Frequently asked questions

Is Falcon-180B better than Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B?

Falcon-180B is the stronger model overall, scoring 31.8 to 29.7 on the Noometry Index.

How many benchmarks do Falcon-180B and Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B share?

6 benchmarks have published results for both models. Falcon-180B has 16 scored results on Noometry and Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B has 21.

Related comparisons

Go deeper