Model comparison

Falcon-180B vs Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite

Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite is the stronger model overall, scoring 40.4 to 31.8 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 7 shared benchmarks.

Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Google

40.4

Rank #141 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 7 benchmarks with published results for both. Falcon-180B scores higher in 0 categories and Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite in 4 categories; 4 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite leads 61.0 to 29.3.
  • Falcon-180B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Falcon-180B and Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite specifications
Falcon-180BGemini 3.1 Flash Lite
ProviderTechnology Innovation InstituteGoogle
Noometry Index31.840.4
Released2023-09-062026-03-03
WeightsOpenProprietary
Context window—1.05M
Max output—66K
Input $ / M tokens—$0.25
Output $ / M tokens—$1.50
Results tracked1638

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Not comparable

Falcon-180B: —, Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite: 37.5 (#179)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkFalcon-180BGemini 3.1 Flash Lite
LMArena WebDev—1256
SciCode—41.9%
WeirdML—52.2%
LMArena Coding—1400
ALE-Bench—797.73

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Falcon-180B: —, Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite: 29.9 (#72)

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkFalcon-180BGemini 3.1 Flash Lite
DeepResearch Bench—37.3%

Reasoning Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite leads

Falcon-180B: 18.3 (#266), Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite: 22.3 (#181)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkFalcon-180BGemini 3.1 Flash Lite
LMArena Hard Prompts10071407
Epoch Capabilities Index111.89144.45
Kagi LLM Benchmark—67.2%
NYT Connections (extended)—8.2%
CritPt—1.1%
Chess Puzzles—25%
EnigmaEval—3%
Thematic Generalization—63.3%
DTBench—76.8%
LMCA—35%
ForecastBench—54.4
HellaSwag89%—
LAMBADA79.8%—
PIQA84.9%—
WinoGrande87.1%—

Math Not comparable

Falcon-180B: —, Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite: 39.5 (#82)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkFalcon-180BGemini 3.1 Flash Lite
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)—27.7%
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025—80%
LMArena Math—1427
GSM8K54.4%—

Knowledge Not comparable

Falcon-180B: —, Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite: 41.7 (#95)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkFalcon-180BGemini 3.1 Flash Lite
GPQA Diamond—81.8%
Humanity's Last Exam—8.6%
Vectara Hallucination Rate—8.2%
LMArena Expert—1397
ARC (AI2) Challenge67.8%—
BoolQ89%—
MMLU70.6%—
OpenBookQA64.2%—

Multimodal Not comparable

Falcon-180B: —, Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite: 38.7 (#57)

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkFalcon-180BGemini 3.1 Flash Lite
LMArena Vision—1240

Multilingual Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite leads

Falcon-180B: 25.3 (#281), Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite: 52.5 (#82)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkFalcon-180BGemini 3.1 Flash Lite
LMArena Non-English10001410
LMArena Chinese—1461
LMArena French—1423
LMArena German—1429
LMArena Japanese—1411
LMArena Korean—1393
LMArena Russian—1420
LMArena Spanish—1420

Instruction Following Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite leads

Falcon-180B: 53.6 (#281), Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite: 72.9 (#126)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkFalcon-180BGemini 3.1 Flash Lite
LMArena Instruction Following10471376

Long Context Not comparable

Falcon-180B: —, Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite: 42.5 (#117)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkFalcon-180BGemini 3.1 Flash Lite
LMArena Longer Query—1394

Writing & Preference Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite leads

Falcon-180B: 29.3 (#290), Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite: 61.0 (#90)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkFalcon-180BGemini 3.1 Flash Lite
LMArena Text10541416
LMArena Creative Writing10891401
LMArena Multi-Turn10131417

Frequently asked questions

Is Falcon-180B better than Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite?

Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite is the stronger model overall, scoring 40.4 to 31.8 on the Noometry Index.

How many benchmarks do Falcon-180B and Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite share?

7 benchmarks have published results for both models. Falcon-180B has 16 scored results on Noometry and Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite has 38.

Related comparisons

Go deeper