Model comparison

Falcon-180B vs gpt-oss-120b

gpt-oss-120b is the stronger model overall, scoring 36.3 to 32.2 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 7 shared benchmarks.

gpt-oss-120b OpenAI

36.3

Rank #217 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 7 benchmarks with published results for both. Falcon-180B scores higher in 0 categories and gpt-oss-120b in 4 categories; 3 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in multilingual, where gpt-oss-120b leads 48.0 to 25.2.

Side by side

Falcon-180B and gpt-oss-120b specifications
Falcon-180Bgpt-oss-120b
ProviderTechnology Innovation InstituteOpenAI
Noometry Index32.236.3
Released2023-09-062025-08-05
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window—131K
Max output—41K
Input $ / M tokens—$0.037
Output $ / M tokens—$0.17
Results tracked1648

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Not comparable

Falcon-180B: —, gpt-oss-120b: 33.5 (#256)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkFalcon-180Bgpt-oss-120b
SWE-bench Verified (bash only)—26%
Aider Polyglot—41.8%
SciCode—36%
WeirdML—48.2%
LMArena Coding—1380
ALE-Bench—575.62
AlgoTune—1.41

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Falcon-180B: —, gpt-oss-120b: 12.2 (#153)

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkFalcon-180Bgpt-oss-120b
Terminal-Bench—18.7%
APEX-Agents—4.4%
METR Time Horizons—56.6%
Vending-Bench 2—-21.53

Reasoning Too close to call

Falcon-180B: 19.1 (#269), gpt-oss-120b: 20.0 (#245)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkFalcon-180Bgpt-oss-120b
LMArena Hard Prompts10071364
Epoch Capabilities Index112.13139.93
SimpleBench—22.1%
Kagi LLM Benchmark—58.6%
CritPt—1.1%
Chess Puzzles—20%
Mystery Game Puzzles—2%
DTBench—76.3%
LMCA—22.1%
Surface Evolver Bench—25%
HellaSwag89%—
LAMBADA79.8%—
PIQA84.9%—
WinoGrande87.1%—

Math Not comparable

Falcon-180B: —, gpt-oss-120b: 52.5 (#50)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkFalcon-180Bgpt-oss-120b
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025—88.9%
Omni-MATH—68.8%
LMArena Math—1389
GSM8K54.4%—

Knowledge Not comparable

Falcon-180B: —, gpt-oss-120b: 42.4 (#96)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkFalcon-180Bgpt-oss-120b
GPQA Diamond—75.8%
MMLU-Pro—79.5%
Confabulations—15.7%
Vectara Hallucination Rate—14.2%
GPQA (HELM)—68.4%
LMArena Expert—1356
ARC (AI2) Challenge67.8%—
BoolQ89%—
MMLU70.6%—
OpenBookQA64.2%—

Multilingual gpt-oss-120b leads

Falcon-180B: 25.2 (#286), gpt-oss-120b: 48.0 (#147)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkFalcon-180Bgpt-oss-120b
LMArena Non-English10001351
LMArena Chinese—1385
LMArena French—1369
LMArena German—1353
LMArena Japanese—1331
LMArena Korean—1282
LMArena Russian—1343
LMArena Spanish—1389

Instruction Following gpt-oss-120b leads

Falcon-180B: 53.4 (#286), gpt-oss-120b: 69.3 (#173)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkFalcon-180Bgpt-oss-120b
LMArena Instruction Following10471318
IFEval—83.6%

Long Context Not comparable

Falcon-180B: —, gpt-oss-120b: 31.4 (#278)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkFalcon-180Bgpt-oss-120b
Fiction.LiveBench—44.4%
LMArena Longer Query—1319

Writing & Preference gpt-oss-120b leads

Falcon-180B: 29.1 (#295), gpt-oss-120b: 46.5 (#217)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkFalcon-180Bgpt-oss-120b
LMArena Text10541365
LMArena Creative Writing10891275
LMArena Multi-Turn10131340
Short-Story Creative Writing—77.1%
EQ-Bench Creative Writing—961
WildBench—84.5%

Frequently asked questions

Is Falcon-180B better than gpt-oss-120b?

gpt-oss-120b is the stronger model overall, scoring 36.3 to 32.2 on the Noometry Index.

How many benchmarks do Falcon-180B and gpt-oss-120b share?

7 benchmarks have published results for both models. Falcon-180B has 16 scored results on Noometry and gpt-oss-120b has 48.

Related comparisons

Go deeper