Model comparison

Falcon-180B vs Kimi K3

Kimi K3 is the stronger model overall, scoring 59.5 to 32.2 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 7 shared benchmarks.

Kimi K3 Moonshot AI

59.5

Rank #15 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 7 benchmarks with published results for both. Falcon-180B scores higher in 0 categories and Kimi K3 in 4 categories; 4 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Kimi K3 leads 76.6 to 29.1.

Side by side

Falcon-180B and Kimi K3 specifications
Falcon-180BKimi K3
ProviderTechnology Innovation InstituteMoonshot AI
Noometry Index32.259.5
Released2023-09-062026-07-16
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window—1.05M
Max output—1.05M
Input $ / M tokens—$3
Output $ / M tokens—$15
Results tracked1653

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Not comparable

Falcon-180B: —, Kimi K3: 61.0 (#10)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkFalcon-180BKimi K3
DeepSWE—68.5%
FrontierCode—44.2%
LMArena WebDev—1654
FrontierSWE—25.9%
SciCode—59.5%
WeirdML—82.6%
LMArena Coding—1508
ALE-Bench—1,524

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Falcon-180B: —, Kimi K3: 41.8 (#20)

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkFalcon-180BKimi K3
APEX-Agents—50.6%
τ²-bench Banking—37.1%
PostTrainBench—32%
GBAEval—48.3%
GDP.pdf—19%
Vending-Bench 2—5,165

Reasoning Kimi K3 leads

Falcon-180B: 19.1 (#269), Kimi K3: 63.0 (#17)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkFalcon-180BKimi K3
LMArena Hard Prompts10071496
Epoch Capabilities Index112.13157.45
ARC-AGI-2—60.4%
SimpleBench—60.7%
NYT Connections (extended)—93.6%
ARC-AGI-1—94.5%
CritPt—23.4%
Chess Puzzles—39%
Mystery Game Puzzles—26%
DTBench—91.2%
LMCA—52.7%
Surface Evolver Bench—95%
ForecastBench—61.1
HellaSwag89%—
LAMBADA79.8%—
PIQA84.9%—
WinoGrande87.1%—

Math Not comparable

Falcon-180B: —, Kimi K3: 74.2 (#16)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkFalcon-180BKimi K3
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)—72.2%
FrontierMath Tier 4—39%
MathArena Final-Answer Competitions—87.8%
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025—97.2%
ProofBench—87%
LMArena Math—1491
GSM8K54.4%—

Knowledge Not comparable

Falcon-180B: —, Kimi K3: 63.2 (#21)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkFalcon-180BKimi K3
GPQA Diamond—93.1%
SimpleQA Verified—50.6%
LMArena Expert—1521
ARC (AI2) Challenge67.8%—
BoolQ89%—
MMLU70.6%—
OpenBookQA64.2%—

Multimodal Not comparable

Falcon-180B: —, Kimi K3: 37.8 (#70)

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkFalcon-180BKimi K3
Blueprint-Bench 2—29.5%
Furniture Assembly—34.2%

Multilingual Kimi K3 leads

Falcon-180B: 25.2 (#286), Kimi K3: 56.3 (#21)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkFalcon-180BKimi K3
LMArena Non-English10001466
LMArena Chinese—1529
LMArena French—1491
LMArena German—1488
LMArena Japanese—1487
LMArena Korean—1458
LMArena Russian—1482
LMArena Spanish—1472

Instruction Following Kimi K3 leads

Falcon-180B: 53.4 (#286), Kimi K3: 77.7 (#14)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkFalcon-180BKimi K3
LMArena Instruction Following10471483

Long Context Not comparable

Falcon-180B: —, Kimi K3: 45.8 (#29)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkFalcon-180BKimi K3
LMArena Longer Query—1494

Writing & Preference Kimi K3 leads

Falcon-180B: 29.1 (#295), Kimi K3: 76.6 (#4)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkFalcon-180BKimi K3
LMArena Text10541476
LMArena Creative Writing10891454
LMArena Multi-Turn10131488
EQ-Bench Creative Writing—2082
EQ-Bench 4—1339

Frequently asked questions

Is Falcon-180B better than Kimi K3?

Kimi K3 is the stronger model overall, scoring 59.5 to 32.2 on the Noometry Index.

How many benchmarks do Falcon-180B and Kimi K3 share?

7 benchmarks have published results for both models. Falcon-180B has 16 scored results on Noometry and Kimi K3 has 53.

Related comparisons

Go deeper