Model comparison

Falcon-180B vs Llama 2-13B

Falcon-180B is the stronger model overall, scoring 32.2 to 29.6 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 16 shared benchmarks.

Llama 2-13B Meta

29.6

Rank #309 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 16 benchmarks with published results for both. Falcon-180B scores higher in 2 categories and Llama 2-13B in 2 categories; 2 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in reasoning, where Falcon-180B leads 19.1 to 12.8.

Side by side

Falcon-180B and Llama 2-13B specifications
Falcon-180BLlama 2-13B
ProviderTechnology Innovation InstituteMeta
Noometry Index32.229.6
Released2023-09-062023-07-18
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window——
Max output——
Input $ / M tokens——
Output $ / M tokens——
Results tracked1632

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Not comparable

Falcon-180B: —, Llama 2-13B: 30.9 (#291)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkFalcon-180BLlama 2-13B
LMArena Coding—1062

Reasoning Falcon-180B leads

Falcon-180B: 19.1 (#269), Llama 2-13B: 12.8 (#337)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkFalcon-180BLlama 2-13B
LMArena Hard Prompts10071051
Epoch Capabilities Index112.13106.17
HellaSwag89%80.7%
LAMBADA79.8%76.5%
PIQA84.9%80.8%
WinoGrande87.1%72.8%
Chess Puzzles—0%
DTBench—42.2%
BIG-Bench Hard—58.2%

Math Not comparable

Falcon-180B: —, Llama 2-13B: 31.1 (#229)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkFalcon-180BLlama 2-13B
GSM8K54.4%36.9%
LMArena Math—1065

Knowledge Not comparable

Falcon-180B: —, Llama 2-13B: 28.1 (#249)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkFalcon-180BLlama 2-13B
ARC (AI2) Challenge67.8%60.3%
BoolQ89%82.4%
MMLU70.6%55.6%
OpenBookQA64.2%57%
LMArena Expert—1030
TriviaQA—79.6%

Multimodal Not comparable

Falcon-180B: —, Llama 2-13B: —

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkFalcon-180BLlama 2-13B
ScienceQA—55.8%

Multilingual Llama 2-13B leads

Falcon-180B: 25.2 (#286), Llama 2-13B: 26.5 (#279)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkFalcon-180BLlama 2-13B
LMArena Non-English10001024
LMArena Chinese—1001
LMArena French—1044
LMArena German—1009
LMArena Japanese—894
LMArena Korean—953
LMArena Russian—1055
LMArena Spanish—1087

Instruction Following Too close to call

Falcon-180B: 53.4 (#286), Llama 2-13B: 53.3 (#287)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkFalcon-180BLlama 2-13B
LMArena Instruction Following10471045

Long Context Not comparable

Falcon-180B: —, Llama 2-13B: 32.3 (#269)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkFalcon-180BLlama 2-13B
LMArena Longer Query—1064

Writing & Preference Too close to call

Falcon-180B: 29.1 (#295), Llama 2-13B: 29.8 (#289)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkFalcon-180BLlama 2-13B
LMArena Text10541084
LMArena Creative Writing10891047
LMArena Multi-Turn10131050

Frequently asked questions

Is Falcon-180B better than Llama 2-13B?

Falcon-180B is the stronger model overall, scoring 32.2 to 29.6 on the Noometry Index.

How many benchmarks do Falcon-180B and Llama 2-13B share?

16 benchmarks have published results for both models. Falcon-180B has 16 scored results on Noometry and Llama 2-13B has 32.

Related comparisons

Go deeper