Model comparison
Falcon-180B vs Llama 3.2 3B
Falcon-180B is the stronger model overall, scoring 31.8 to 28.4 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 6 shared benchmarks.
Technology Innovation Institute
MetaSummary
- They share 6 benchmarks with published results for both. Falcon-180B scores higher in 1 category and Llama 3.2 3B in 3 categories; 4 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Falcon-180B leads 29.3 to 24.9.
Side by side
| Falcon-180B | Llama 3.2 3B | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Technology Innovation Institute | Meta |
| Noometry Index | 31.8 | 28.4 |
| Released | 2023-09-06 | 2024-09-24 |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | — | 131K |
| Max output | — | 118K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $0.05 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $0.33 |
| Results tracked | 16 | 18 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Not comparable
Falcon-180B: —, Llama 3.2 3B: 27.1 (#314)
| Benchmark | Falcon-180B | Llama 3.2 3B |
|---|---|---|
| BigCodeBench Instruct | — | 23.4% |
| LMArena Coding | — | 1098 |
| BigCodeBench Complete | — | 28.3% |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Falcon-180B: —, Llama 3.2 3B: 19.9 (#135)
| Benchmark | Falcon-180B | Llama 3.2 3B |
|---|---|---|
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | — | 21.9% |
| BALROG | — | 10.1% |
Reasoning Llama 3.2 3B leads
Falcon-180B: 18.3 (#266), Llama 3.2 3B: 20.1 (#225)
| Benchmark | Falcon-180B | Llama 3.2 3B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1007 | 1095 |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 111.89 | — |
| HellaSwag | 89% | — |
| LAMBADA | 79.8% | — |
| PIQA | 84.9% | — |
| WinoGrande | 87.1% | — |
Math Not comparable
Falcon-180B: —, Llama 3.2 3B: 29.9 (#213)
| Benchmark | Falcon-180B | Llama 3.2 3B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | — | 1126 |
| GSM8K | 54.4% | — |
Knowledge Not comparable
Falcon-180B: —, Llama 3.2 3B: 29.1 (#232)
| Benchmark | Falcon-180B | Llama 3.2 3B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | — | 1090 |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | 67.8% | — |
| BoolQ | 89% | — |
| MMLU | 70.6% | — |
| OpenBookQA | 64.2% | — |
Multilingual Llama 3.2 3B leads
Falcon-180B: 25.3 (#281), Llama 3.2 3B: 26.4 (#276)
| Benchmark | Falcon-180B | Llama 3.2 3B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1000 | 1019 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1017 |
| LMArena German | — | 1056 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 949 |
Instruction Following Llama 3.2 3B leads
Falcon-180B: 53.6 (#281), Llama 3.2 3B: 56.3 (#270)
| Benchmark | Falcon-180B | Llama 3.2 3B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1047 | 1089 |
Long Context Not comparable
Falcon-180B: —, Llama 3.2 3B: 33.4 (#256)
| Benchmark | Falcon-180B | Llama 3.2 3B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1101 |
Writing & Preference Falcon-180B leads
Falcon-180B: 29.3 (#290), Llama 3.2 3B: 24.9 (#302)
| Benchmark | Falcon-180B | Llama 3.2 3B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1054 | 1110 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1089 | 1094 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1013 | 1105 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | — | 595 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Falcon-180B better than Llama 3.2 3B?
Falcon-180B is the stronger model overall, scoring 31.8 to 28.4 on the Noometry Index.
How many benchmarks do Falcon-180B and Llama 3.2 3B share?
6 benchmarks have published results for both models. Falcon-180B has 16 scored results on Noometry and Llama 3.2 3B has 18.