Model comparison

Falcon-180B vs Llama 4 Maverick

Falcon-180B is the stronger model overall, scoring 32.2 to 30.9 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 7 shared benchmarks.

Llama 4 Maverick Meta

30.9

Rank #282 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 7 benchmarks with published results for both. Falcon-180B scores higher in 1 category and Llama 4 Maverick in 3 categories; 4 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in instruction following, where Llama 4 Maverick leads 71.7 to 53.4.

Side by side

Falcon-180B and Llama 4 Maverick specifications
Falcon-180BLlama 4 Maverick
ProviderTechnology Innovation InstituteMeta
Noometry Index32.230.9
Released2023-09-062025-04-05
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window—128K
Max output—4K
Input $ / M tokens—$0.19
Output $ / M tokens—$0.65
Results tracked1654

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Not comparable

Falcon-180B: —, Llama 4 Maverick: 26.6 (#324)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkFalcon-180BLlama 4 Maverick
SWE-bench Verified (bash only)—21%
Aider Polyglot—15.6%
SciCode—33.1%
WeirdML—24.5%
BigCodeBench Instruct—49.7%
LMArena Coding—1302
BigCodeBench Complete—61.4%
ALE-Bench—172.97

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Falcon-180B: —, Llama 4 Maverick: 28.2 (#91)

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkFalcon-180BLlama 4 Maverick
Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard—37.3%

Reasoning Falcon-180B leads

Falcon-180B: 19.1 (#269), Llama 4 Maverick: 10.1 (#342)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkFalcon-180BLlama 4 Maverick
LMArena Hard Prompts10071281
Epoch Capabilities Index112.13132.2
ARC-AGI-2—0%
SimpleBench—27.7%
Kagi LLM Benchmark—55.9%
NYT Connections (extended)—8%
ARC-AGI-1—4.4%
CritPt—0%
EnigmaEval—0.6%
DTBench—61.9%
LMCA—15.9%
ForecastBench—57.5
HellaSwag89%—
LAMBADA79.8%—
PIQA84.9%—
WinoGrande87.1%—

Math Not comparable

Falcon-180B: —, Llama 4 Maverick: 26.0 (#262)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkFalcon-180BLlama 4 Maverick
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025—20.6%
Omni-MATH—42.2%
LMArena Math—1299
MATH Level 5—73%
FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set)—0.7%
GSM8K54.4%—

Knowledge Not comparable

Falcon-180B: —, Llama 4 Maverick: 33.4 (#204)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkFalcon-180BLlama 4 Maverick
GPQA Diamond—67%
Humanity's Last Exam—5.7%
MMLU-Pro—81%
Confabulations—22.6%
Vectara Hallucination Rate—8.2%
GPQA (HELM)—65%
LMArena Expert—1259
ARC (AI2) Challenge67.8%—
BoolQ89%—
MMLU70.6%—
OpenBookQA64.2%—

Multimodal Not comparable

Falcon-180B: —, Llama 4 Maverick: 31.6 (#105)

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkFalcon-180BLlama 4 Maverick
LMArena Vision—1142
GeoBench—52%
SpatialViz-Bench—31.8%

Multilingual Llama 4 Maverick leads

Falcon-180B: 25.2 (#286), Llama 4 Maverick: 42.2 (#195)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkFalcon-180BLlama 4 Maverick
LMArena Non-English10001269
LMArena Chinese—1277
LMArena French—1259
LMArena German—1291
LMArena Japanese—1207
LMArena Korean—1203
LMArena Russian—1286
LMArena Spanish—1293

Instruction Following Llama 4 Maverick leads

Falcon-180B: 53.4 (#286), Llama 4 Maverick: 71.7 (#146)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkFalcon-180BLlama 4 Maverick
LMArena Instruction Following10471267
IFEval—90.8%

Long Context Not comparable

Falcon-180B: —, Llama 4 Maverick: 31.4 (#279)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkFalcon-180BLlama 4 Maverick
Fiction.LiveBench—46.2%
LMArena Longer Query—1280

Writing & Preference Llama 4 Maverick leads

Falcon-180B: 29.1 (#295), Llama 4 Maverick: 38.8 (#252)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkFalcon-180BLlama 4 Maverick
LMArena Text10541287
LMArena Creative Writing10891267
LMArena Multi-Turn10131289
Short-Story Creative Writing—62%
EQ-Bench Creative Writing—860
WildBench—80%

Frequently asked questions

Is Falcon-180B better than Llama 4 Maverick?

Falcon-180B is the stronger model overall, scoring 32.2 to 30.9 on the Noometry Index.

How many benchmarks do Falcon-180B and Llama 4 Maverick share?

7 benchmarks have published results for both models. Falcon-180B has 16 scored results on Noometry and Llama 4 Maverick has 54.

Related comparisons

Go deeper