Model comparison
Falcon-180B vs Magistral Medium
Magistral Medium is the stronger model overall, scoring 35.2 to 32.2 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 6 shared benchmarks.
Summary
- They share 6 benchmarks with published results for both. Falcon-180B scores higher in 1 category and Magistral Medium in 3 categories; 4 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Magistral Medium leads 46.3 to 29.1.
Side by side
| Falcon-180B | Magistral Medium | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Technology Innovation Institute | Mistral AI |
| Noometry Index | 32.2 | 35.2 |
| Released | 2023-09-06 | 2025-03-17 |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | — | 262K |
| Max output | — | 16K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $2 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $5 |
| Results tracked | 16 | 22 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Not comparable
Falcon-180B: —, Magistral Medium: 39.1 (#161)
| Benchmark | Falcon-180B | Magistral Medium |
|---|---|---|
| SciCode | — | 39.2% |
| LMArena Coding | — | 1319 |
Reasoning Falcon-180B leads
Falcon-180B: 19.1 (#269), Magistral Medium: 8.6 (#348)
| Benchmark | Falcon-180B | Magistral Medium |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1007 | 1267 |
| ARC-AGI-2 | — | 0% |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | — | 16.2% |
| ARC-AGI-1 | — | 6.1% |
| CritPt | — | 0.3% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 112.13 | — |
| HellaSwag | 89% | — |
| LAMBADA | 79.8% | — |
| PIQA | 84.9% | — |
| WinoGrande | 87.1% | — |
Math Not comparable
Falcon-180B: —, Magistral Medium: 35.1 (#189)
| Benchmark | Falcon-180B | Magistral Medium |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | — | 1250 |
| GSM8K | 54.4% | — |
Knowledge Not comparable
Falcon-180B: —, Magistral Medium: 33.5 (#202)
| Benchmark | Falcon-180B | Magistral Medium |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | — | 1223 |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | 67.8% | — |
| BoolQ | 89% | — |
| MMLU | 70.6% | — |
| OpenBookQA | 64.2% | — |
Multilingual Magistral Medium leads
Falcon-180B: 25.2 (#286), Magistral Medium: 39.6 (#224)
| Benchmark | Falcon-180B | Magistral Medium |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1000 | 1232 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1227 |
| LMArena French | — | 1267 |
| LMArena German | — | 1248 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1175 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1125 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1224 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1271 |
Instruction Following Magistral Medium leads
Falcon-180B: 53.4 (#286), Magistral Medium: 66.0 (#211)
| Benchmark | Falcon-180B | Magistral Medium |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1047 | 1254 |
Long Context Not comparable
Falcon-180B: —, Magistral Medium: 39.3 (#183)
| Benchmark | Falcon-180B | Magistral Medium |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1295 |
Writing & Preference Magistral Medium leads
Falcon-180B: 29.1 (#295), Magistral Medium: 46.3 (#219)
| Benchmark | Falcon-180B | Magistral Medium |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1054 | 1255 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1089 | 1245 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1013 | 1275 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Falcon-180B better than Magistral Medium?
Magistral Medium is the stronger model overall, scoring 35.2 to 32.2 on the Noometry Index.
How many benchmarks do Falcon-180B and Magistral Medium share?
6 benchmarks have published results for both models. Falcon-180B has 16 scored results on Noometry and Magistral Medium has 22.