Model comparison

Falcon-180B vs Magistral Medium

Magistral Medium is the stronger model overall, scoring 35.2 to 32.2 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 6 shared benchmarks.

Magistral Medium Mistral AI

35.2

Rank #227 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 6 benchmarks with published results for both. Falcon-180B scores higher in 1 category and Magistral Medium in 3 categories; 4 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Magistral Medium leads 46.3 to 29.1.

Side by side

Falcon-180B and Magistral Medium specifications
Falcon-180BMagistral Medium
ProviderTechnology Innovation InstituteMistral AI
Noometry Index32.235.2
Released2023-09-062025-03-17
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window—262K
Max output—16K
Input $ / M tokens—$2
Output $ / M tokens—$5
Results tracked1622

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Not comparable

Falcon-180B: —, Magistral Medium: 39.1 (#161)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkFalcon-180BMagistral Medium
SciCode—39.2%
LMArena Coding—1319

Reasoning Falcon-180B leads

Falcon-180B: 19.1 (#269), Magistral Medium: 8.6 (#348)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkFalcon-180BMagistral Medium
LMArena Hard Prompts10071267
ARC-AGI-2—0%
Kagi LLM Benchmark—16.2%
ARC-AGI-1—6.1%
CritPt—0.3%
Epoch Capabilities Index112.13—
HellaSwag89%—
LAMBADA79.8%—
PIQA84.9%—
WinoGrande87.1%—

Math Not comparable

Falcon-180B: —, Magistral Medium: 35.1 (#189)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkFalcon-180BMagistral Medium
LMArena Math—1250
GSM8K54.4%—

Knowledge Not comparable

Falcon-180B: —, Magistral Medium: 33.5 (#202)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkFalcon-180BMagistral Medium
LMArena Expert—1223
ARC (AI2) Challenge67.8%—
BoolQ89%—
MMLU70.6%—
OpenBookQA64.2%—

Multilingual Magistral Medium leads

Falcon-180B: 25.2 (#286), Magistral Medium: 39.6 (#224)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkFalcon-180BMagistral Medium
LMArena Non-English10001232
LMArena Chinese—1227
LMArena French—1267
LMArena German—1248
LMArena Japanese—1175
LMArena Korean—1125
LMArena Russian—1224
LMArena Spanish—1271

Instruction Following Magistral Medium leads

Falcon-180B: 53.4 (#286), Magistral Medium: 66.0 (#211)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkFalcon-180BMagistral Medium
LMArena Instruction Following10471254

Long Context Not comparable

Falcon-180B: —, Magistral Medium: 39.3 (#183)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkFalcon-180BMagistral Medium
LMArena Longer Query—1295

Writing & Preference Magistral Medium leads

Falcon-180B: 29.1 (#295), Magistral Medium: 46.3 (#219)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkFalcon-180BMagistral Medium
LMArena Text10541255
LMArena Creative Writing10891245
LMArena Multi-Turn10131275

Frequently asked questions

Is Falcon-180B better than Magistral Medium?

Magistral Medium is the stronger model overall, scoring 35.2 to 32.2 on the Noometry Index.

How many benchmarks do Falcon-180B and Magistral Medium share?

6 benchmarks have published results for both models. Falcon-180B has 16 scored results on Noometry and Magistral Medium has 22.

Related comparisons

Go deeper