Model comparison

Falcon-180B vs Muse Spark 1.2

Muse Spark 1.2 is the stronger model overall, scoring 50.3 to 32.2 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 7 shared benchmarks.

Muse Spark 1.2 Meta

50.3

Rank #48 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 7 benchmarks with published results for both. Falcon-180B scores higher in 0 categories and Muse Spark 1.2 in 4 categories; 4 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Muse Spark 1.2 leads 72.3 to 29.1.
  • Falcon-180B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Falcon-180B and Muse Spark 1.2 specifications
Falcon-180BMuse Spark 1.2
ProviderTechnology Innovation InstituteMeta
Noometry Index32.250.3
Released2023-09-062026-08-05
WeightsOpenProprietary
Context window—1.05M
Max output—131K
Input $ / M tokens—$1.25
Output $ / M tokens—$4.25
Results tracked1631

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Not comparable

Falcon-180B: —, Muse Spark 1.2: 49.2 (#51)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkFalcon-180BMuse Spark 1.2
DeepSWE—54.9%
LMArena WebDev—1533
FrontierSWE—12%
SciCode—56.4%
WeirdML—60.3%
LMArena Coding—1495

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Falcon-180B: —, Muse Spark 1.2: 29.4 (#87)

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkFalcon-180BMuse Spark 1.2
APEX-Agents—36.4%
GDP.pdf—16%

Reasoning Muse Spark 1.2 leads

Falcon-180B: 19.1 (#269), Muse Spark 1.2: 51.3 (#34)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkFalcon-180BMuse Spark 1.2
LMArena Hard Prompts10071486
Epoch Capabilities Index112.13154.87
SimpleBench—74.5%
NYT Connections (extended)—79.2%
CritPt—17.7%
DTBench—94.7%
LMCA—48.4%
HellaSwag89%—
LAMBADA79.8%—
PIQA84.9%—
WinoGrande87.1%—

Math Not comparable

Falcon-180B: —, Muse Spark 1.2: 46.4 (#70)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkFalcon-180BMuse Spark 1.2
ProofBench—43%
LMArena Math—1471
GSM8K54.4%—

Knowledge Not comparable

Falcon-180B: —, Muse Spark 1.2: 54.1 (#53)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkFalcon-180BMuse Spark 1.2
SimpleQA Verified—60.3%
LMArena Expert—1480
ARC (AI2) Challenge67.8%—
BoolQ89%—
MMLU70.6%—
OpenBookQA64.2%—

Multimodal Not comparable

Falcon-180B: —, Muse Spark 1.2: 43.4 (#25)

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkFalcon-180BMuse Spark 1.2
LMArena Vision—1305

Multilingual Muse Spark 1.2 leads

Falcon-180B: 25.2 (#286), Muse Spark 1.2: 57.1 (#11)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkFalcon-180BMuse Spark 1.2
LMArena Non-English10001478
LMArena Chinese—1511
LMArena French—1513
LMArena Russian—1487
LMArena Spanish—1498

Instruction Following Muse Spark 1.2 leads

Falcon-180B: 53.4 (#286), Muse Spark 1.2: 76.7 (#36)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkFalcon-180BMuse Spark 1.2
LMArena Instruction Following10471461

Long Context Not comparable

Falcon-180B: —, Muse Spark 1.2: 45.2 (#48)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkFalcon-180BMuse Spark 1.2
LMArena Longer Query—1475

Writing & Preference Muse Spark 1.2 leads

Falcon-180B: 29.1 (#295), Muse Spark 1.2: 72.3 (#14)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkFalcon-180BMuse Spark 1.2
LMArena Text10541482
LMArena Creative Writing10891449
LMArena Multi-Turn10131494
EQ-Bench Creative Writing—1840

Frequently asked questions

Is Falcon-180B better than Muse Spark 1.2?

Muse Spark 1.2 is the stronger model overall, scoring 50.3 to 32.2 on the Noometry Index.

How many benchmarks do Falcon-180B and Muse Spark 1.2 share?

7 benchmarks have published results for both models. Falcon-180B has 16 scored results on Noometry and Muse Spark 1.2 has 31.

Related comparisons

Go deeper